反思性日记促进批判性反思后模拟教育

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101511
Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN , Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA , Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE , Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN
{"title":"反思性日记促进批判性反思后模拟教育","authors":"Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE ,&nbsp;Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective Journaling to Promote Critical Reflective Thinking Post-Simulation-Based Education\",\"authors\":\"Julianne A. Walsh PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Sethares PhD, RN, CNE, FAHA, FHFSA ,&nbsp;Jennifer Dunbar Viveiros PhD, RN, CNE ,&nbsp;Marilyn E. Asselin PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景反思日记可能是促进模拟汇报后反思和批判性反思过程的一种有用方法。方法在 AMNP 和 CRI 模型的指导下,这项为期 3 周的准实验性两组前测-后测研究测试了指导反思日记对 54 名执照前护理专业学生(n = 25 名干预组和 29 名对照组)的反思思维和批判性反思思维的影响。反思性思维量表(RTI,3-15 分,分值越高反思效果越好)和批判性反思量表(CRIAT,0-180 分,分值越高批判性反思效果越好)分别测量反思和批判性反思。各组之间的反思水平存在差异,对照组在两个时间点的得分都更高。干预后,干预组批判性反思的平均得分略高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflective Journaling to Promote Critical Reflective Thinking Post-Simulation-Based Education

Background

Reflective journaling may be a useful method to promote the processes of reflection and critical reflection post simulation debriefing.

Methods

Guided by the AMNP and CRI models, this 3-week quasi-experimental two group pretest-posttest study tested the effects of guided reflective journaling on reflective thinking and critical reflective thinking in 54 prelicensure nursing students (n = 25 intervention and 29 control). The Reflection subscale of the Reflective Thinking Inventory (RTI, 3-15, higher better reflection) and Critical Reflective Thinking Inventory (CRIAT, 0-180, higher scores better critical reflection) measured reflection and critical reflection, respectively.

Results

MANCOVA demonstrated no differences over time and no interaction effect on the outcome variables. There was a difference in level of reflection between groups with the control group demonstrating greater scores at both time points. Mean scores for critical reflection were slightly higher post intervention for the intervention group.

Conclusion

Findings suggest guided reflective journaling post-SBE may enhance critical reflection with a greater dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Embracing quick response technology to bring assessments to life during simulation Combining storytelling and a scenario re-enactment of Mt. Everest expeditions to practice cognitive and social skills Psychometric Testing of NASA-TLX to Measure Learners’ Cognitive Load in Individual and Group Nursing Simulations Becoming a team player: Evaluating a simulation interprofessional activity between third year nursing students and second year medical radiation science students - A feasibility study Interprofessional Learning for Nursing Students during a Mass Casualty Incident Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1