对髋部骨折手术中低剂量脊髓麻醉对血流动力学影响的回顾性、观察性、单中心、队列数据库分析

Stuart M. White
{"title":"对髋部骨折手术中低剂量脊髓麻醉对血流动力学影响的回顾性、观察性、单中心、队列数据库分析","authors":"Stuart M. White","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used <em>per se</em>. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP &lt;70 mm Hg and &lt;55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% <em>vs</em> 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both &lt;0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings &lt;70 mm Hg and &lt;55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% <em>vs</em> 19.6%, <em>P</em>=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% <em>vs</em> 24.3%, <em>P</em>=0.0099) than the remaining ‘normotensive’ cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower <em>vs</em> higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>NCT05799300.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054/pdfft?md5=5fb22a71fc2d4704dc19978f54b018e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery\",\"authors\":\"Stuart M. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used <em>per se</em>. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP &lt;70 mm Hg and &lt;55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% <em>vs</em> 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both &lt;0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings &lt;70 mm Hg and &lt;55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% <em>vs</em> 19.6%, <em>P</em>=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% <em>vs</em> 24.3%, <em>P</em>=0.0099) than the remaining ‘normotensive’ cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower <em>vs</em> higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>NCT05799300.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054/pdfft?md5=5fb22a71fc2d4704dc19978f54b018e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000054-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景脊髓(鞘内)或全身麻醉的慎重实施对髋部骨折手术后预后的影响可能比使用哪种方法本身更大。方法在这项观察性单中心研究中,分析了 280 名接受单侧髋部骨折手术的患者在使用高压脊髓布比卡因 0.结果97/98(99.0%)例患者的队列平均动脉压(MAP)在随后的 1 分钟记录时间间隔内保持在基线(脊髓注射)MAP 的 10% 以内。最低 MAP <70 mm Hg 和 <55 mm Hg 的发生率明显低于历史同等水平(麻醉实践冲刺审计 1 和 2)(分别为 52.9% 和 10.4% vs 71.9% 和 23.8%,均为 0.0001)。在 10 551 个 MAP 读数中,<70 mm Hg 和<55 mm Hg 的比例分别为 6.7% 和 0.4%。45名(16.1%)患者有相对持续的低血压(术中读数五次或五次以上,MAP≤70 mm Hg),与其余 "正常血压 "组群相比,他们在统计学上更可能体弱(诺丁汉髋部骨折评分≥7/10,37.8% vs 19.6%,P=0.0109)和服用α/β-受体阻滞剂(44.4% vs 24.3%,P=0.0099)。结论低剂量的高压脊髓0.5%布比卡因(1.3毫升,6.5毫克)在手术过程中对血压的降幅很小,并能提供足够的手术麻醉时间。现在需要对较低剂量与较高/标准剂量的脊髓麻醉进行随机比较,以确认对这一易受伤害的患者群体的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery

Background

Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used per se. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia.

Methods

In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg).

Results

Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% vs 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both <0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% vs 19.6%, P=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% vs 24.3%, P=0.0099) than the remaining ‘normotensive’ cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure.

Conclusions

Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower vs higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05799300.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study of a new combined approach for managing preoperative anxiety in patients with breast or gynaecological cancer Perioperative considerations in the paediatric patient with congenital and acquired coagulopathy Evaluation of lung homogeneity in neonates and small infants during general anaesthesia using electrical impedance tomography: a prospective observational study Paediatric perioperative hypersensitivity: the performance of the current consensus formula and the effect of uneventful anaesthesia on serum tryptase. Reply to BJA Open 2024; 9: 100254 An update on iron therapy as an intervention to reduce blood transfusion for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1