{"title":"中国碳价格在区域和全国排放权交易试点期间的区域制度转换行为","authors":"Kai Chang, Zesheng Li, Boyang Li","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10191-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regime-switching process reflects mechanistic transition states and forecasts extreme carbon price volatility; this article tends to investigate the regional regime-switching behaviors of China’s carbon price using the Markov switching model. Our empirical results demonstrate that carbon prices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, and Hubei exhibit significant regime-switching for the period from January 2, 2014 to April 30, 2022; our results are similar with the regime-switching behavior of European Union’s carbon and energy price. Shenzhen’s carbon prices generate greater market fluctuations than those of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, and Hubei. The switching probabilities of carbon prices from low-variance to high-variance state in Shanghai and Beijing are greater than those of Guangdong, Shenzhen, and Hubei. Annual compulsory allowance submissions, allowances allocation corrections, phase-switching between regional and nationwide ETS pilots, and sophisticated energy markets are the main driving factors of regime-switching behavior in China’s carbon prices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional regime-switching behavior of China’s carbon price during regional and nationwide emissions trading scheme pilots\",\"authors\":\"Kai Chang, Zesheng Li, Boyang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10191-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Regime-switching process reflects mechanistic transition states and forecasts extreme carbon price volatility; this article tends to investigate the regional regime-switching behaviors of China’s carbon price using the Markov switching model. Our empirical results demonstrate that carbon prices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, and Hubei exhibit significant regime-switching for the period from January 2, 2014 to April 30, 2022; our results are similar with the regime-switching behavior of European Union’s carbon and energy price. Shenzhen’s carbon prices generate greater market fluctuations than those of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, and Hubei. The switching probabilities of carbon prices from low-variance to high-variance state in Shanghai and Beijing are greater than those of Guangdong, Shenzhen, and Hubei. Annual compulsory allowance submissions, allowances allocation corrections, phase-switching between regional and nationwide ETS pilots, and sophisticated energy markets are the main driving factors of regime-switching behavior in China’s carbon prices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10191-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10191-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional regime-switching behavior of China’s carbon price during regional and nationwide emissions trading scheme pilots
Regime-switching process reflects mechanistic transition states and forecasts extreme carbon price volatility; this article tends to investigate the regional regime-switching behaviors of China’s carbon price using the Markov switching model. Our empirical results demonstrate that carbon prices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangdong, and Hubei exhibit significant regime-switching for the period from January 2, 2014 to April 30, 2022; our results are similar with the regime-switching behavior of European Union’s carbon and energy price. Shenzhen’s carbon prices generate greater market fluctuations than those of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, and Hubei. The switching probabilities of carbon prices from low-variance to high-variance state in Shanghai and Beijing are greater than those of Guangdong, Shenzhen, and Hubei. Annual compulsory allowance submissions, allowances allocation corrections, phase-switching between regional and nationwide ETS pilots, and sophisticated energy markets are the main driving factors of regime-switching behavior in China’s carbon prices.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.