利用品牌真实性促进亲社会服务行为

IF 4 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Brand Management Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1057/s41262-024-00352-1
Weng Marc Lim, Nishtha Malik, Sahil Gupta, Himanshu Rai
{"title":"利用品牌真实性促进亲社会服务行为","authors":"Weng Marc Lim, Nishtha Malik, Sahil Gupta, Himanshu Rai","doi":"10.1057/s41262-024-00352-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In today’s fiercely competitive, customer-centric, and service-driven marketplace, where customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty are hard-won currencies, brand authenticity emerges as a pivotal cornerstone, potentially fostering prosocial service behavior among employees—a crucial driver of organizational success. Yet, the intricate link between brand authenticity and prosocial service behavior remains a compelling and notably understudied frontier. To address this gap, we explore how prosocial service behavior can be shaped by brand authenticity. Using partial least squares–structural equation modeling based on survey responses from a random sample of 410 frontline employees in the hospitality industry, we found that brand authenticity alone cannot spark prosocial service behavior. Instead, brands must foster psychological empowerment and organizational commitment in order to activate and harness the power of brand authenticity in nurturing prosocial service behavior. This is because employees require both a belief in their own influence (empowerment) and a strong attachment to their organization (commitment) to fully express the genuine values of a brand through prosocial actions. However, caution should be noted: introducing job autonomy might diminish the impact of psychological empowerment. This counterintuitive effect could be attributed to the perception that excessive autonomy, while meant to empower, might be seen as a lack of guidance or support. Such a scenario may potentially make employees feel isolated or overwhelmed by decision-making responsibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Brand Management","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing brand authenticity to promote prosocial service behavior\",\"authors\":\"Weng Marc Lim, Nishtha Malik, Sahil Gupta, Himanshu Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41262-024-00352-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In today’s fiercely competitive, customer-centric, and service-driven marketplace, where customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty are hard-won currencies, brand authenticity emerges as a pivotal cornerstone, potentially fostering prosocial service behavior among employees—a crucial driver of organizational success. Yet, the intricate link between brand authenticity and prosocial service behavior remains a compelling and notably understudied frontier. To address this gap, we explore how prosocial service behavior can be shaped by brand authenticity. Using partial least squares–structural equation modeling based on survey responses from a random sample of 410 frontline employees in the hospitality industry, we found that brand authenticity alone cannot spark prosocial service behavior. Instead, brands must foster psychological empowerment and organizational commitment in order to activate and harness the power of brand authenticity in nurturing prosocial service behavior. This is because employees require both a belief in their own influence (empowerment) and a strong attachment to their organization (commitment) to fully express the genuine values of a brand through prosocial actions. However, caution should be noted: introducing job autonomy might diminish the impact of psychological empowerment. This counterintuitive effect could be attributed to the perception that excessive autonomy, while meant to empower, might be seen as a lack of guidance or support. Such a scenario may potentially make employees feel isolated or overwhelmed by decision-making responsibilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Brand Management\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Brand Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00352-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-024-00352-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今竞争激烈、以客户为中心、以服务为导向的市场环境中,客户满意度、信任度和忠诚度都是来之不易的货币,品牌的真实性成为至关重要的基石,有可能促进员工的亲社会服务行为--这是组织成功的关键驱动力。然而,品牌真实性与亲社会服务行为之间错综复杂的联系仍然是一个引人注目但研究明显不足的前沿领域。为了填补这一空白,我们探讨了品牌真实性如何影响亲社会服务行为。通过对酒店业 410 名一线员工的随机抽样调查进行偏最小二乘法结构方程建模,我们发现,仅靠品牌真实性并不能激发亲社会服务行为。相反,品牌必须促进心理授权和组织承诺,以激活和利用品牌真实性在培养亲社会服务行为方面的力量。这是因为员工需要相信自己的影响力(授权)和对组织的强烈依恋(承诺),才能通过亲社会行为充分表达品牌的真正价值。不过,需要注意的是:引入工作自主权可能会削弱心理授权的影响。造成这种反直觉效应的原因可能是,人们认为过度的自主权虽然是为了赋权,但也可能被视为缺乏指导或支持。这种情况可能会使员工感到孤立无援或被决策责任压得喘不过气来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harnessing brand authenticity to promote prosocial service behavior

In today’s fiercely competitive, customer-centric, and service-driven marketplace, where customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty are hard-won currencies, brand authenticity emerges as a pivotal cornerstone, potentially fostering prosocial service behavior among employees—a crucial driver of organizational success. Yet, the intricate link between brand authenticity and prosocial service behavior remains a compelling and notably understudied frontier. To address this gap, we explore how prosocial service behavior can be shaped by brand authenticity. Using partial least squares–structural equation modeling based on survey responses from a random sample of 410 frontline employees in the hospitality industry, we found that brand authenticity alone cannot spark prosocial service behavior. Instead, brands must foster psychological empowerment and organizational commitment in order to activate and harness the power of brand authenticity in nurturing prosocial service behavior. This is because employees require both a belief in their own influence (empowerment) and a strong attachment to their organization (commitment) to fully express the genuine values of a brand through prosocial actions. However, caution should be noted: introducing job autonomy might diminish the impact of psychological empowerment. This counterintuitive effect could be attributed to the perception that excessive autonomy, while meant to empower, might be seen as a lack of guidance or support. Such a scenario may potentially make employees feel isolated or overwhelmed by decision-making responsibilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original and insightful peer-reviewed articles as well as industry-based case studies plus invited expert commentaries and editorials which rigorously consider:models and theories effectively used in brand management research and practicehow the world's leading companies are managing their brandsthe latest thinking techniques and initiatives used by agencies and consultantscurrent case studies which explore leading organisations' practical experiences the problems faced and the lessons learnedapplied research from leading business schools research institutes and universitiesIf after reading the aims and scope you consider your article potentially relevant you may submit your work?for consideration as per the?normal process. The Journal Editors do not ordinarily discuss potential suitability of articles prior to submission.The Journal also regularly publishes themed special issues and is essential reading for brand strategists in both private and public sector organisations and academics in universities and business schools - including:Professors and LecturersMaster MBA and PhD studentsBrand ResearchersMarketing and Branding ConsultantsHeads of Branding Brand Directors and ManagersMarketing DirectorsBusiness Development ManagersHeads of Corporate CommunicationsCEOs and Managing DirectorsAgency DirectorsPlanning Directors and Strategic PlannersIP Lawyers and Patent AttorneysTopics covered include but are not limited to:Online or Digital BrandingBrand Metrics and/or AnalyticsLuxury BrandingBrand Ethics and/or Corporate Social ResponsibilityBrand and Finance Brand Reputation Identity and ImageBrand Relationship Loyalty or LoveBranding and TechnologyBranding Innovation and/or R&DBrand Valuation Integrated Brand CommunicationBrand ManagementBrand EquityBrand Community (Online)Product BrandingService BrandingBusiness-to-Business BrandingRetail BrandingPrivate Label Branding Brand Heritage and History Qualitative and Quantitative Brand ResearchBrand Architecture and PortfoliosBrand Alliances and MergersCorporate Brand ManagementBrand ExperienceBrand CrisesBrand CounterfeitsBrand and LawBrand Extension and Brand Growth Brand Credibility and TrustOpen Brand ManagementBrand Elements (Logo Naming Packaging etc.)Branding for Profit and Non-Profit OrganisationsBrand Co-creation Brand Research Methods
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of incidental priming when measuring trademark genericism When brand cynicism turns into brand hate: the mediating role of brand hate on the relationship between brand cynicism and negative WOM Redefining brand identity and internal communications in turbulent times: the case of Banco Sabadell Act your age to engage: field evidence on parent versus brand extension Using value co-creation behavior as a mediator to explore the influence of virtual tourism community characteristics on destination brand equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1