平衡计分卡的系统动力学方法:运营管理的回顾和动态战略图

IF 7.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069
Ivo Hristov, Matteo Cristofaro, Riccardo Camilli, Luna Leoni
{"title":"平衡计分卡的系统动力学方法:运营管理的回顾和动态战略图","authors":"Ivo Hristov, Matteo Cristofaro, Riccardo Camilli, Luna Leoni","doi":"10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to (1) identify the different performance drivers (lead indicators) and outcome measures (lag indicators) investigated in the literature concerning the four balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives in operations management (OM) contexts and (2) understand how performance drivers and outcome measures (and substantiated perspectives) are related.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We undertake a systematic literature review of the BSC literature in OM journals. From the final sample of 40 articles, performance drivers and outcome measures have been identified, and the relationships amongst them have been synthesised according to the system dynamics approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Findings show (1) the most relevant performance drivers and outcome measures within each BSC perspective, (2) their relationships, (3) how the perspectives are linked through the performance drivers and outcome measures and (4) how the different measures relate systemically. Accordingly, four causal loops amongst identified measures have been built, which – jointly considered – allowed for the creation of a dynamic strategy map for OM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is the first one that provides a comprehensive and holistic view of how the different performance drivers and outcome measures within and between the four BSC perspectives in OM relate systemically, increasing the knowledge and understanding of scholars and practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":16301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A system dynamics approach to the balanced scorecard: a review and dynamic strategy map for operations management\",\"authors\":\"Ivo Hristov, Matteo Cristofaro, Riccardo Camilli, Luna Leoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to (1) identify the different performance drivers (lead indicators) and outcome measures (lag indicators) investigated in the literature concerning the four balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives in operations management (OM) contexts and (2) understand how performance drivers and outcome measures (and substantiated perspectives) are related.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>We undertake a systematic literature review of the BSC literature in OM journals. From the final sample of 40 articles, performance drivers and outcome measures have been identified, and the relationships amongst them have been synthesised according to the system dynamics approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Findings show (1) the most relevant performance drivers and outcome measures within each BSC perspective, (2) their relationships, (3) how the perspectives are linked through the performance drivers and outcome measures and (4) how the different measures relate systemically. Accordingly, four causal loops amongst identified measures have been built, which – jointly considered – allowed for the creation of a dynamic strategy map for OM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study is the first one that provides a comprehensive and holistic view of how the different performance drivers and outcome measures within and between the four BSC perspectives in OM relate systemically, increasing the knowledge and understanding of scholars and practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":16301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-02-2022-0069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在:(1) 识别运营管理(OM)中有关四种平衡计分卡(BSC)视角的文献中所研究的不同绩效驱动因素(先行指标)和结果衡量指标(滞后指标);(2) 了解绩效驱动因素和结果衡量指标(以及经证实的视角)之间的关系。研究结果研究结果表明:(1) 每种 BSC 视角中最相关的绩效驱动因素和成果衡量标准;(2) 它们之间的关系;(3) 视角如何通过绩效驱动因素和成果衡量标准联系起来;(4) 不同的衡量标准如何系统地联系起来。因此,在已确定的衡量标准之间建立了四个因果循环,通过对这些因果循环的综合考虑,创建了一个动态的运营管理战略地图。原创性/价值这项研究首次对运营管理中四个 BSC 视角内部和视角之间的不同绩效驱动因素和成果衡量标准如何系统地联系起来提供了一个全面而整体的视角,增加了学者和从业人员的知识和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A system dynamics approach to the balanced scorecard: a review and dynamic strategy map for operations management

Purpose

This paper aims to (1) identify the different performance drivers (lead indicators) and outcome measures (lag indicators) investigated in the literature concerning the four balanced scorecard (BSC) perspectives in operations management (OM) contexts and (2) understand how performance drivers and outcome measures (and substantiated perspectives) are related.

Design/methodology/approach

We undertake a systematic literature review of the BSC literature in OM journals. From the final sample of 40 articles, performance drivers and outcome measures have been identified, and the relationships amongst them have been synthesised according to the system dynamics approach.

Findings

Findings show (1) the most relevant performance drivers and outcome measures within each BSC perspective, (2) their relationships, (3) how the perspectives are linked through the performance drivers and outcome measures and (4) how the different measures relate systemically. Accordingly, four causal loops amongst identified measures have been built, which – jointly considered – allowed for the creation of a dynamic strategy map for OM.

Originality/value

This study is the first one that provides a comprehensive and holistic view of how the different performance drivers and outcome measures within and between the four BSC perspectives in OM relate systemically, increasing the knowledge and understanding of scholars and practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management
Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management Engineering-Control and Systems Engineering
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management (JMTM) aspires to be the premier destination for impactful manufacturing-related research. JMTM provides comprehensive international coverage of topics pertaining to the management of manufacturing technology, focusing on bridging theoretical advancements with practical applications to enhance manufacturing practices. JMTM seeks articles grounded in empirical evidence, such as surveys, case studies, and action research, to ensure relevance and applicability. All submissions should include a thorough literature review to contextualize the study within the field and clearly demonstrate how the research contributes significantly and originally by comparing and contrasting its findings with existing knowledge. Articles should directly address management of manufacturing technology and offer insights with broad applicability.
期刊最新文献
Business model structuration in Industry 4.0: an analysis of the value-based strategies of smart service providers in Brazil Linking manufacturing firms with environment: role of green manufacturing and environmental management on firm’s environmental performance with moderating effect of external environmental regulations Supply chain concentration, digitalization and servitization of manufacturing firms Green manufacturing, supply chain alertness, supply chain preparedness and manufacturing performance in a developing economy Subsidiary participation in global services: local antecedents and performance outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1