{"title":"中国社区老年人骨骼肌质量估算公式的开发与验证","authors":"Yun Sun, Tongtong Yin, Mengli Li, Fangfang Wang, Jiaying Qi, Hui Zhang, Li Wang, Jiehua Zhao, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.2147/cia.s440967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> This study aimed to establish equations for estimating muscle mass through anthropometric parameters or together with physical function parameters in the community-dwelling older adults, providing a simple way of muscle mass assessment.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> In this cross-sectional descriptive study, a total of 1537 older adults were recruited from the community and accepted the measurements of height, weight, upper arm and calf circumferences, grip strength, and walking speed. Body composition including appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Participants were randomly divided into the development or validation group. Stepwise multiple linear regression was applied to develop equations in the development group. Thereafter, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired <em>t</em>-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-samples <em>t</em>-tests were used to assess the validity of the equations.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> All parameters were significantly correlated with ASM (<em>r</em> = 0.195~0.795, <em>P</em> < 0.001) except for the age in the validation group (<em>P</em> = 0.746). The most optimal anthropometric equation was: <![CDATA[${\\rm{ASM}} = - 5.142 - 4.346 \\times {\\rm{sex}}\\left({{\\rm{men}} = 1,{\\rm{women}} = 2} \\right)\\,+ 0.136 \\times {\\rm{weight}}\\left({{\\rm{kg}}} \\right) + 9.009 \\times {\\rm{height}}\\left({\\rm{m}} \\right) + 0.283 \\times {\\rm{calf}}{\\rm{circumference}}\\left({{\\rm{cm}}} \\right) - 0.034 \\times {\\rm{age}}\\left({{\\rm{years}}} \\right)$]]> [adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.911, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 1.311, <em>P</em> < 0.001]. Comparatively speaking, this equation showed high correlation coefficient (<em>r</em> = 0.951, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and ICC (ICC = 0.950, <em>P</em> < 0.001). No significant differences were found between BIA-measured ASM and the estimated ASM. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference between the estimated ASM and BIA-measured ASM was 0 kg and the limits of agreement of ASM was − 2.70~2.60 kg. Furthermore, inclusion of physical function did not significantly improve the adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> and SEE.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The anthropometric equation offers a practical alternative simple and dependable method for estimating ASM in community-dwelling older adults.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> appendicular muscle mass, anthropometry, physical function, estimation equation, older adults<br/>","PeriodicalId":10417,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","volume":"254 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of Estimation Equations for Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Yun Sun, Tongtong Yin, Mengli Li, Fangfang Wang, Jiaying Qi, Hui Zhang, Li Wang, Jiehua Zhao, Yu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/cia.s440967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Purpose:</strong> This study aimed to establish equations for estimating muscle mass through anthropometric parameters or together with physical function parameters in the community-dwelling older adults, providing a simple way of muscle mass assessment.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> In this cross-sectional descriptive study, a total of 1537 older adults were recruited from the community and accepted the measurements of height, weight, upper arm and calf circumferences, grip strength, and walking speed. Body composition including appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Participants were randomly divided into the development or validation group. Stepwise multiple linear regression was applied to develop equations in the development group. Thereafter, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired <em>t</em>-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-samples <em>t</em>-tests were used to assess the validity of the equations.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> All parameters were significantly correlated with ASM (<em>r</em> = 0.195~0.795, <em>P</em> < 0.001) except for the age in the validation group (<em>P</em> = 0.746). The most optimal anthropometric equation was: <![CDATA[${\\\\rm{ASM}} = - 5.142 - 4.346 \\\\times {\\\\rm{sex}}\\\\left({{\\\\rm{men}} = 1,{\\\\rm{women}} = 2} \\\\right)\\\\,+ 0.136 \\\\times {\\\\rm{weight}}\\\\left({{\\\\rm{kg}}} \\\\right) + 9.009 \\\\times {\\\\rm{height}}\\\\left({\\\\rm{m}} \\\\right) + 0.283 \\\\times {\\\\rm{calf}}{\\\\rm{circumference}}\\\\left({{\\\\rm{cm}}} \\\\right) - 0.034 \\\\times {\\\\rm{age}}\\\\left({{\\\\rm{years}}} \\\\right)$]]> [adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.911, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 1.311, <em>P</em> < 0.001]. Comparatively speaking, this equation showed high correlation coefficient (<em>r</em> = 0.951, <em>P</em> < 0.001) and ICC (ICC = 0.950, <em>P</em> < 0.001). No significant differences were found between BIA-measured ASM and the estimated ASM. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference between the estimated ASM and BIA-measured ASM was 0 kg and the limits of agreement of ASM was − 2.70~2.60 kg. Furthermore, inclusion of physical function did not significantly improve the adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> and SEE.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The anthropometric equation offers a practical alternative simple and dependable method for estimating ASM in community-dwelling older adults.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> appendicular muscle mass, anthropometry, physical function, estimation equation, older adults<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"volume\":\"254 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Interventions in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s440967\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Interventions in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s440967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Validation of Estimation Equations for Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Purpose: This study aimed to establish equations for estimating muscle mass through anthropometric parameters or together with physical function parameters in the community-dwelling older adults, providing a simple way of muscle mass assessment. Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, a total of 1537 older adults were recruited from the community and accepted the measurements of height, weight, upper arm and calf circumferences, grip strength, and walking speed. Body composition including appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Participants were randomly divided into the development or validation group. Stepwise multiple linear regression was applied to develop equations in the development group. Thereafter, Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, paired t-test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-samples t-tests were used to assess the validity of the equations. Results: All parameters were significantly correlated with ASM (r = 0.195~0.795, P < 0.001) except for the age in the validation group (P = 0.746). The most optimal anthropometric equation was: [adjusted R2 = 0.911, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 1.311, P < 0.001]. Comparatively speaking, this equation showed high correlation coefficient (r = 0.951, P < 0.001) and ICC (ICC = 0.950, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between BIA-measured ASM and the estimated ASM. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference between the estimated ASM and BIA-measured ASM was 0 kg and the limits of agreement of ASM was − 2.70~2.60 kg. Furthermore, inclusion of physical function did not significantly improve the adjusted R2 and SEE. Conclusion: The anthropometric equation offers a practical alternative simple and dependable method for estimating ASM in community-dwelling older adults.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Interventions in Aging, is an online, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on concise rapid reporting of original research and reviews in aging. Special attention will be given to papers reporting on actual or potential clinical applications leading to improved prevention or treatment of disease or a greater understanding of pathological processes that result from maladaptive changes in the body associated with aging. This journal is directed at a wide array of scientists, engineers, pharmacists, pharmacologists and clinical specialists wishing to maintain an up to date knowledge of this exciting and emerging field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
