澳大利亚学校教育背景下的学生数字权利政策文件分析

{"title":"澳大利亚学校教育背景下的学生数字权利政策文件分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Contemporary education is being undeniably shaped by datafication, and while new algorithmic and automated decision-making processes can have educational benefits, they also raise issues about children’s digital rights and education policy responses to these rights. This study mapped how children’s digital right to privacy and related human rights concepts are present in education policy documents of Australia’s three largest state government departments of education. A children’s rights coding framework was developed from the United Nation’s ‘General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment’ and used to code the dataset. Two levels of analysis were then undertaken. Level 1 involved code and subcode frequency analyses of concepts related to children’s digital rights in policy documents. Level 2 was a descriptive qualitative analysis designed to understand how digital rights were expressed in policy. The study found that although all state government departments of education reflected some elements of children’s digital rights, some states had a more complex, sustained and public-facing commitment to expressing these in policy. The study concluded that Australian government departments of education should work towards providing more transparent public-facing policy on children’s digital rights that can empower students and their families to make informed decisions within a rapidly shifting digital environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":501129,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Educational Researcher","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A policy document analysis of student digital rights in the Australian schooling context\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Contemporary education is being undeniably shaped by datafication, and while new algorithmic and automated decision-making processes can have educational benefits, they also raise issues about children’s digital rights and education policy responses to these rights. This study mapped how children’s digital right to privacy and related human rights concepts are present in education policy documents of Australia’s three largest state government departments of education. A children’s rights coding framework was developed from the United Nation’s ‘General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment’ and used to code the dataset. Two levels of analysis were then undertaken. Level 1 involved code and subcode frequency analyses of concepts related to children’s digital rights in policy documents. Level 2 was a descriptive qualitative analysis designed to understand how digital rights were expressed in policy. The study found that although all state government departments of education reflected some elements of children’s digital rights, some states had a more complex, sustained and public-facing commitment to expressing these in policy. The study concluded that Australian government departments of education should work towards providing more transparent public-facing policy on children’s digital rights that can empower students and their families to make informed decisions within a rapidly shifting digital environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australian Educational Researcher\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australian Educational Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00683-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 当代教育无可否认地受到数据化的影响,虽然新的算法和自动决策过程可能会给教育带来益处,但它们也提出了有关儿童数字权利和教育政策应对这些权利的问题。本研究绘制了澳大利亚三大州政府教育部门的教育政策文件中如何体现儿童数字隐私权及相关人权概念的图谱。根据联合国 "关于数字环境中儿童权利的第 25 号一般性意见(2021 年)"制定了儿童权利编码框架,并用于对数据集进行编码。然后进行了两级分析。第一层是对政策文件中与儿童数字权利相关的概念进行编码和子编码频率分析。第 2 层次是描述性定性分析,旨在了解政策中是如何表述数字权利的。研究发现,尽管所有州政府教育部门都反映了儿童数字权利的某些要素,但有些州在政策中表达这些要素的承诺更为复杂、持久,并面向公众。研究认为,澳大利亚政府教育部门应努力提供更加透明、面向公众的儿童数字权利政策,使学生及其家庭能够在快速变化的数字环境中做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A policy document analysis of student digital rights in the Australian schooling context

Abstract

Contemporary education is being undeniably shaped by datafication, and while new algorithmic and automated decision-making processes can have educational benefits, they also raise issues about children’s digital rights and education policy responses to these rights. This study mapped how children’s digital right to privacy and related human rights concepts are present in education policy documents of Australia’s three largest state government departments of education. A children’s rights coding framework was developed from the United Nation’s ‘General comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment’ and used to code the dataset. Two levels of analysis were then undertaken. Level 1 involved code and subcode frequency analyses of concepts related to children’s digital rights in policy documents. Level 2 was a descriptive qualitative analysis designed to understand how digital rights were expressed in policy. The study found that although all state government departments of education reflected some elements of children’s digital rights, some states had a more complex, sustained and public-facing commitment to expressing these in policy. The study concluded that Australian government departments of education should work towards providing more transparent public-facing policy on children’s digital rights that can empower students and their families to make informed decisions within a rapidly shifting digital environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interplay of context and need: unravelling the interwoven threads of teachers’ professional learning/development The roles of AI and educational leaders in AI-assisted administrative decision-making: a proposed framework for symbiotic collaboration Teacher produced video tours of classrooms: what matters for their teaching of writing? Addressing the hidden labour of mentoring preservice teachers Responding to children’s voices: the new frontier in education policy reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1