影响离开学术界的推拉因素

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Tertiary Education and Management Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s11233-024-09135-4
Tomi Kallio, Taru Siekkinen, Elias Pekkola, Jussi Kivistö, Terhi Nokkala, Päivikki Kuoppakangas
{"title":"影响离开学术界的推拉因素","authors":"Tomi Kallio, Taru Siekkinen, Elias Pekkola, Jussi Kivistö, Terhi Nokkala, Päivikki Kuoppakangas","doi":"10.1007/s11233-024-09135-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the findings of the push and pull factors that cause professionals to leave academia. Previous research has mostly focused on academic professionals’ intent to leave their current organisations and largely neglected occupational turnover, that is, the cases where faculty abandon an academic career. The study included 40 semi-structured interviews and a national survey (<i>N</i> = 410) conducted in 2017. The interviewees consisted of three groups: previous faculty members who left academia, members of universities’ upper management (deans, vice-rectors and HR managers) and upper managers and HR managers of public and private organisations employing previous academic faculty members. The survey was sent to all scholars who had left academia in Finland during 2010–2015. The qualitative empirical analysis suggests that most of the internal push factors that caused the academic professionals to leave were inversed external pull factors that lured them away from academia. However, it also hints that in many cases, certain individual factors seem to mediate the two. In practice this means that individual factors, such as lack of interest in research and/or teaching and unwillingness to compete in some positions, also contribute to the decision to leave academia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51727,"journal":{"name":"Tertiary Education and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Push and pull factors affecting in leaving academia\",\"authors\":\"Tomi Kallio, Taru Siekkinen, Elias Pekkola, Jussi Kivistö, Terhi Nokkala, Päivikki Kuoppakangas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11233-024-09135-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents the findings of the push and pull factors that cause professionals to leave academia. Previous research has mostly focused on academic professionals’ intent to leave their current organisations and largely neglected occupational turnover, that is, the cases where faculty abandon an academic career. The study included 40 semi-structured interviews and a national survey (<i>N</i> = 410) conducted in 2017. The interviewees consisted of three groups: previous faculty members who left academia, members of universities’ upper management (deans, vice-rectors and HR managers) and upper managers and HR managers of public and private organisations employing previous academic faculty members. The survey was sent to all scholars who had left academia in Finland during 2010–2015. The qualitative empirical analysis suggests that most of the internal push factors that caused the academic professionals to leave were inversed external pull factors that lured them away from academia. However, it also hints that in many cases, certain individual factors seem to mediate the two. In practice this means that individual factors, such as lack of interest in research and/or teaching and unwillingness to compete in some positions, also contribute to the decision to leave academia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tertiary Education and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tertiary Education and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-024-09135-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tertiary Education and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-024-09135-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了导致专业人员离开学术界的推拉因素的研究结果。以往的研究大多关注学术专业人员离开当前组织的意向,而在很大程度上忽视了职业流动,即教师放弃学术生涯的情况。本研究包括 40 个半结构式访谈和 2017 年进行的一项全国调查(N = 410)。受访者包括三类:离开学术界的前任教师、大学高层管理人员(院长、副校长和人力资源经理)以及聘用前任学术教师的公共和私营机构的高层管理人员和人力资源经理。调查对象为 2010-2015 年间离开芬兰学术界的所有学者。定性实证分析表明,导致学术专业人员离职的大多数内部推动因素都与吸引他们离开学术界的外部拉动因素相抵消。不过,分析也暗示,在许多情况下,某些个人因素似乎在两者之间起到了中介作用。在实践中,这意味着个人因素,如对研究和/或教学缺乏兴趣、不愿参与某些职位的竞争等,也会促成离开学术界的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Push and pull factors affecting in leaving academia

This paper presents the findings of the push and pull factors that cause professionals to leave academia. Previous research has mostly focused on academic professionals’ intent to leave their current organisations and largely neglected occupational turnover, that is, the cases where faculty abandon an academic career. The study included 40 semi-structured interviews and a national survey (N = 410) conducted in 2017. The interviewees consisted of three groups: previous faculty members who left academia, members of universities’ upper management (deans, vice-rectors and HR managers) and upper managers and HR managers of public and private organisations employing previous academic faculty members. The survey was sent to all scholars who had left academia in Finland during 2010–2015. The qualitative empirical analysis suggests that most of the internal push factors that caused the academic professionals to leave were inversed external pull factors that lured them away from academia. However, it also hints that in many cases, certain individual factors seem to mediate the two. In practice this means that individual factors, such as lack of interest in research and/or teaching and unwillingness to compete in some positions, also contribute to the decision to leave academia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tertiary Education and Management
Tertiary Education and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Tertiary Education and Management (TEAM) is an international, interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal that welcomes research contributions that reflect upon, study or question main developmental trends and practices, and address current and future challenges in higher education. The thematic focus of TEAM includes management, governance and organisation of higher education; teaching and learning in higher education; the academic profession and academic careers; higher education and the labour market; and institutional research in higher education.  TEAM is jointly published by Springer and EAIR – The European Higher Education Society, and is intended to contribute to EAIR’s mission of creating a better linkage of research, policy and practice in higher education.Articles submitted should as a consequence be written for, understood by, and be relevant for a multicultural, multifaceted and international audience, consisting of both the international academic community and the field of practice within higher education.  TEAM welcomes articles using a variety of approaches, methods and perspectives given that the article demonstrate the relevance of the research in a broader context whether this be in other higher education institutions, other national settings or in the international arena.  Occasionally, the journal also publishes articles where personal viewpoints/experiences or political arguments are made to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education. Such pieces are published in a dedicated ''Forum'' section of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Building capacity in institutional research: collaboration and complementarity? Thinking or talking about teaching? Student evaluation as an occasion for dialogue or reflection on teaching Values in British higher education: knowledge, freedom and wellbeing The cross-employment of PhDs across the university sector boundary: an analysis of Finnish register data Push and pull factors affecting in leaving academia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1