美国学术机构中残疾教师和科学家的经历

Franz Castro, Caroline Cerilli, Luanjiao Hu, Lisa Iezzoni, Varshini Varadaraj, Bonnielin Swenor
{"title":"美国学术机构中残疾教师和科学家的经历","authors":"Franz Castro, Caroline Cerilli, Luanjiao Hu, Lisa Iezzoni, Varshini Varadaraj, Bonnielin Swenor","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.12.24302692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. People with disabilities are underrepresented in higher education, facing systematic obstacles such as inaccessible institutions and difficulties in obtaining accommodations. This qualitative study aims to shed light on barriers to accessibility and disability inclusion in STEM and research institutions through confidential qualitative interviews with disabled faculty and scientists.\nMethods. We recruited participants (via virtual flyers) working in the United States (U.S.) as research faculty or scientists that applied for grant funding (last five years), and self-identified as having a disability. Interviews (n=35) were conducted via semi-structured one-on-one live interviews or written interviews to accommodate participants' needs. Data were analyzed by two study members using content analysis to identify themes and codes until saturation was reached.\nResults. Themes included identity/visibility, career trajectories, accessibility, accommodations, bias, representation, and inclusion. Some participants reported not disclosing their disabilities at work or during hiring processes due to fear of negative perceptions from peers or potential employers. Experiences around stigma and bias were noted both in professional relationships and when interacting with disability service offices, underscoring difficulties and delays in processes to secure accommodations. Respondents highlighted the issues of lack of disability inclusion and low representation of people with disabilities in academia, elevating the importance of self-advocacy, and of role models and mentors in shaping career pathways for future researchers with disabilities.\nConclusion. Faculty with disabilities encounter systematic barriers at academic institutions, and lack of acknowledgement and research on these experiences has held back institutional and policy changes. To reduce disparities for disabled faculty, academic leadership must allocate resources to address ableism, create more inclusive environments, and raise standards beyond ADA compliance.","PeriodicalId":501387,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of faculty and scientists with disabilities at academic institutions in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Franz Castro, Caroline Cerilli, Luanjiao Hu, Lisa Iezzoni, Varshini Varadaraj, Bonnielin Swenor\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.12.24302692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. People with disabilities are underrepresented in higher education, facing systematic obstacles such as inaccessible institutions and difficulties in obtaining accommodations. This qualitative study aims to shed light on barriers to accessibility and disability inclusion in STEM and research institutions through confidential qualitative interviews with disabled faculty and scientists.\\nMethods. We recruited participants (via virtual flyers) working in the United States (U.S.) as research faculty or scientists that applied for grant funding (last five years), and self-identified as having a disability. Interviews (n=35) were conducted via semi-structured one-on-one live interviews or written interviews to accommodate participants' needs. Data were analyzed by two study members using content analysis to identify themes and codes until saturation was reached.\\nResults. Themes included identity/visibility, career trajectories, accessibility, accommodations, bias, representation, and inclusion. Some participants reported not disclosing their disabilities at work or during hiring processes due to fear of negative perceptions from peers or potential employers. Experiences around stigma and bias were noted both in professional relationships and when interacting with disability service offices, underscoring difficulties and delays in processes to secure accommodations. Respondents highlighted the issues of lack of disability inclusion and low representation of people with disabilities in academia, elevating the importance of self-advocacy, and of role models and mentors in shaping career pathways for future researchers with disabilities.\\nConclusion. Faculty with disabilities encounter systematic barriers at academic institutions, and lack of acknowledgement and research on these experiences has held back institutional and policy changes. To reduce disparities for disabled faculty, academic leadership must allocate resources to address ableism, create more inclusive environments, and raise standards beyond ADA compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.12.24302692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.12.24302692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。残障人士在高等教育中的代表性不足,他们面临着一些系统性障碍,如无法进入的机构和难以获得便利。这项定性研究旨在通过对残疾教师和科学家进行保密的定性访谈,揭示科技、工程、数学和数学研究机构在无障碍环境和残疾包容方面存在的障碍。我们(通过虚拟传单)招募了在美国(U.S. )工作的研究教员或科学家,他们在过去五年中申请过资助,并自我认定有残疾。访谈(n=35)通过半结构化的一对一现场访谈或书面访谈进行,以满足参与者的需求。两名研究成员采用内容分析法对数据进行了分析,以确定主题和代码,直至达到饱和状态。主题包括身份/可见性、职业轨迹、可及性、便利性、偏见、代表性和包容性。一些参与者报告说,由于害怕同行或潜在雇主的负面看法,他们在工作中或招聘过程中没有透露自己的残疾情况。无论是在职业关系中,还是在与残疾人服务办公室互动时,他们都提到了与污名化和偏见有关的经历,强调了在获得便利的过程中遇到的困难和延误。受访者强调了学术界缺乏对残障人士的包容以及残障人士代表性较低的问题,并强调了自我倡导以及榜样和导师在为未来的残障研究人员塑造职业道路方面的重要性。残疾教职员工在学术机构中会遇到系统性的障碍,对这些经历缺乏认可和研究阻碍了机构和政策的变革。为了减少残疾教职员工的不平等现象,学术领导层必须分配资源来解决能力歧视问题,创造更具包容性的环境,并提高标准,使其超越《美国残疾人法》的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of faculty and scientists with disabilities at academic institutions in the United States
Introduction. People with disabilities are underrepresented in higher education, facing systematic obstacles such as inaccessible institutions and difficulties in obtaining accommodations. This qualitative study aims to shed light on barriers to accessibility and disability inclusion in STEM and research institutions through confidential qualitative interviews with disabled faculty and scientists. Methods. We recruited participants (via virtual flyers) working in the United States (U.S.) as research faculty or scientists that applied for grant funding (last five years), and self-identified as having a disability. Interviews (n=35) were conducted via semi-structured one-on-one live interviews or written interviews to accommodate participants' needs. Data were analyzed by two study members using content analysis to identify themes and codes until saturation was reached. Results. Themes included identity/visibility, career trajectories, accessibility, accommodations, bias, representation, and inclusion. Some participants reported not disclosing their disabilities at work or during hiring processes due to fear of negative perceptions from peers or potential employers. Experiences around stigma and bias were noted both in professional relationships and when interacting with disability service offices, underscoring difficulties and delays in processes to secure accommodations. Respondents highlighted the issues of lack of disability inclusion and low representation of people with disabilities in academia, elevating the importance of self-advocacy, and of role models and mentors in shaping career pathways for future researchers with disabilities. Conclusion. Faculty with disabilities encounter systematic barriers at academic institutions, and lack of acknowledgement and research on these experiences has held back institutional and policy changes. To reduce disparities for disabled faculty, academic leadership must allocate resources to address ableism, create more inclusive environments, and raise standards beyond ADA compliance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of wiki- and blog-based Virtual Learning Environments as tools for improving collaborative learning in the Bachelor of Nursing degree. Comparative Analysis of Stress Responses in Medical Students Using Virtual Reality Versus Traditional 3D-Printed Mannequins for Pericardiocentesis Training The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Medical Education and Practice: A Systematic Literature Review Precision Education Tools for Pediatrics Trainees: A Mixed-Methods Multi-Site Usability Assessment Silence in physician clinical practice: a scoping review protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1