基于多个参考剖面推断排序模型的元智程

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s10472-024-09926-w
Arwa Khannoussi, Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, Patrick Meyer, Bastien Pasdeloup
{"title":"基于多个参考剖面推断排序模型的元智程","authors":"Arwa Khannoussi, Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, Patrick Meyer, Bastien Pasdeloup","doi":"10.1007/s10472-024-09926-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, decision makers often face problems with multiple conflicting criteria that justify the use of preference models to help advancing towards a decision. In order to determine the parameters of these preference models, preference elicitation makes use of preference learning algorithms, usually taking as input holistic judgments, i.e., overall preferences on some of the alternatives, expressed by the decision maker. Tools to achieve this goal in the context of a ranking model based on multiple reference profiles are usually based on mixed-integer linear programming, Boolean satisfiability formulation or metaheuristics. However, they are usually unable to handle realistic problems involving many criteria and a large amount of input information. We propose here an evolutionary metaheuristic in order to address this issue. Extensive experiments illustrate its ability to handle problem instances that previous proposals cannot.</p>","PeriodicalId":7971,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A metaheuristic for inferring a ranking model based on multiple reference profiles\",\"authors\":\"Arwa Khannoussi, Alexandru-Liviu Olteanu, Patrick Meyer, Bastien Pasdeloup\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10472-024-09926-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the context of Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, decision makers often face problems with multiple conflicting criteria that justify the use of preference models to help advancing towards a decision. In order to determine the parameters of these preference models, preference elicitation makes use of preference learning algorithms, usually taking as input holistic judgments, i.e., overall preferences on some of the alternatives, expressed by the decision maker. Tools to achieve this goal in the context of a ranking model based on multiple reference profiles are usually based on mixed-integer linear programming, Boolean satisfiability formulation or metaheuristics. However, they are usually unable to handle realistic problems involving many criteria and a large amount of input information. We propose here an evolutionary metaheuristic in order to address this issue. Extensive experiments illustrate its ability to handle problem instances that previous proposals cannot.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-024-09926-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-024-09926-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 "多标准决策辅助"(Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding)的背景下,决策者经常会面临多种标准相互冲突的问题,这就需要使用偏好模型来帮助他们做出决策。为了确定这些偏好模型的参数,偏好激发利用了偏好学习算法,通常将整体判断(即决策者对某些备选方案的总体偏好)作为输入。在基于多个参考档案的排序模型中,实现这一目标的工具通常基于混合整数线性规划、布尔可满足性公式或元搜索。然而,它们通常无法处理涉及多个标准和大量输入信息的现实问题。为了解决这个问题,我们在此提出了一种进化元寻优方法。广泛的实验表明,它有能力处理以前的建议无法处理的问题实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A metaheuristic for inferring a ranking model based on multiple reference profiles

In the context of Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding, decision makers often face problems with multiple conflicting criteria that justify the use of preference models to help advancing towards a decision. In order to determine the parameters of these preference models, preference elicitation makes use of preference learning algorithms, usually taking as input holistic judgments, i.e., overall preferences on some of the alternatives, expressed by the decision maker. Tools to achieve this goal in the context of a ranking model based on multiple reference profiles are usually based on mixed-integer linear programming, Boolean satisfiability formulation or metaheuristics. However, they are usually unable to handle realistic problems involving many criteria and a large amount of input information. We propose here an evolutionary metaheuristic in order to address this issue. Extensive experiments illustrate its ability to handle problem instances that previous proposals cannot.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence presents a range of topics of concern to scholars applying quantitative, combinatorial, logical, algebraic and algorithmic methods to diverse areas of Artificial Intelligence, from decision support, automated deduction, and reasoning, to knowledge-based systems, machine learning, computer vision, robotics and planning. The journal features collections of papers appearing either in volumes (400 pages) or in separate issues (100-300 pages), which focus on one topic and have one or more guest editors. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence hopes to influence the spawning of new areas of applied mathematics and strengthen the scientific underpinnings of Artificial Intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Time-penalised trees (TpT): introducing a new tree-based data mining algorithm for time-varying covariates Conformal test martingales for hypergraphical models Costly information providing in binary contests Tumato 2.0 - a constraint-based planning approach for safe and robust robot behavior Calibration methods in imbalanced binary classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1