用于煤电厂机组部件的低氮高硼含量 10% Cr-3% Сo-2% W-0.29% Cu-0.17% Re 钢的抗蠕变性和组织结构

IF 1.8 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Physical Mesomechanics Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1134/S1029959924010090
A. Fedoseeva
{"title":"用于煤电厂机组部件的低氮高硼含量 10% Cr-3% Сo-2% W-0.29% Cu-0.17% Re 钢的抗蠕变性和组织结构","authors":"A. Fedoseeva","doi":"10.1134/S1029959924010090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The creep resistance and structure of 10% Cr–3% Сo–2% W–0.29% Cu–0.17% Re steel with 0.1% carbon, low nitrogen content and high boron content were investigated by creep rupture testing at a temperature of 650°C and stresses from 200 to 100 MPa applied in 20-MPa increments. For comparison, 9% Cr steel with 0.1% carbon, 0.05% nitrogen, and 0.005% boron was considered. The steels were subjected to preliminary heat treatment including normalizing at 1050°C for 1 hour, tempering at 750–770°C for 3 hours, and cooling in air. The structures of both heat-treated steels exhibited martensite laths with boundaries pinned by М<sub>23</sub>С<sub>6</sub> carbides, and the rearrangement of dislocations was retarded by MX particles. A significant difference between 10% Cr and 9% Cr steels was the presence of fine М<sub>23</sub>С<sub>6</sub> carbide particles characterized by orientational relationships with the ferrite matrix and MX carbonitrides, whose volume fraction was 6 times lower. Short-term tensile tests at room temperature showed no differences between the steels, while the creep rupture strength of 10% Cr steel was 13% higher than for 9% Cr steel. The creep deformation mechanism of the steels was also different. Structural analysis of 10% Cr steel after creep tests revealed no substantial changes in its lath structure: the lath width increased by only 58% and the dislocation density was reduced by a factor of 2. Comparison with 9% Cr steel showed that the good structural stability of 10% Cr steel during creep is caused by the high coarsening resistance of second phase particles, whose coarsening rate is 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than that in 9% Cr steel.</p>","PeriodicalId":726,"journal":{"name":"Physical Mesomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":"88 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creep Resistance and Structure of 10% Cr–3% Сo–2% W–0.29% Cu–0.17% Re Steel with Low Nitrogen and High Boron Contents for Unit Components of Coal Power Plants\",\"authors\":\"A. Fedoseeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1029959924010090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The creep resistance and structure of 10% Cr–3% Сo–2% W–0.29% Cu–0.17% Re steel with 0.1% carbon, low nitrogen content and high boron content were investigated by creep rupture testing at a temperature of 650°C and stresses from 200 to 100 MPa applied in 20-MPa increments. For comparison, 9% Cr steel with 0.1% carbon, 0.05% nitrogen, and 0.005% boron was considered. The steels were subjected to preliminary heat treatment including normalizing at 1050°C for 1 hour, tempering at 750–770°C for 3 hours, and cooling in air. The structures of both heat-treated steels exhibited martensite laths with boundaries pinned by М<sub>23</sub>С<sub>6</sub> carbides, and the rearrangement of dislocations was retarded by MX particles. A significant difference between 10% Cr and 9% Cr steels was the presence of fine М<sub>23</sub>С<sub>6</sub> carbide particles characterized by orientational relationships with the ferrite matrix and MX carbonitrides, whose volume fraction was 6 times lower. Short-term tensile tests at room temperature showed no differences between the steels, while the creep rupture strength of 10% Cr steel was 13% higher than for 9% Cr steel. The creep deformation mechanism of the steels was also different. Structural analysis of 10% Cr steel after creep tests revealed no substantial changes in its lath structure: the lath width increased by only 58% and the dislocation density was reduced by a factor of 2. Comparison with 9% Cr steel showed that the good structural stability of 10% Cr steel during creep is caused by the high coarsening resistance of second phase particles, whose coarsening rate is 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than that in 9% Cr steel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Mesomechanics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"88 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Mesomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1029959924010090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Mesomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1029959924010090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 通过蠕变断裂试验研究了含 0.1%碳、低氮和高硼的 10%Cr-3%Сo-2%W-0.29%Cu-0.17%Re钢的抗蠕变性和结构,试验温度为 650°C,应力从 200 兆帕到 100 兆帕,以 20 兆帕为增量。作为对比,还考虑了含 0.1% 碳、0.05% 氮和 0.005% 硼的 9% 铬钢。钢材经过初步热处理,包括在 1050°C 正火 1 小时,在 750-770°C 回火 3 小时,然后在空气中冷却。两种热处理钢的结构都呈现出马氏体板条,其边界由М23С6碳化物钉住,MX颗粒阻碍了位错的重新排列。10% 铬钢和 9% 铬钢之间的一个显著区别是存在细小的М23С6 碳化物颗粒,其特征是与铁素体基体和 MX 碳氮化物之间存在取向关系,其体积分数低 6 倍。室温下的短期拉伸试验显示,两种钢之间没有差异,而 10% Cr 钢的蠕变断裂强度比 9% Cr 钢高 13%。两种钢的蠕变变形机制也不同。蠕变试验后对 10% 铬钢的结构分析表明,其板条结构没有发生实质性变化:板条宽度仅增加了 58%,位错密度降低了 2 倍。 与 9% 铬钢的比较表明,10% 铬钢在蠕变过程中具有良好的结构稳定性是由于第二相颗粒具有较高的抗粗化能力,其粗化率比 9% 铬钢低 1-2 个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creep Resistance and Structure of 10% Cr–3% Сo–2% W–0.29% Cu–0.17% Re Steel with Low Nitrogen and High Boron Contents for Unit Components of Coal Power Plants

The creep resistance and structure of 10% Cr–3% Сo–2% W–0.29% Cu–0.17% Re steel with 0.1% carbon, low nitrogen content and high boron content were investigated by creep rupture testing at a temperature of 650°C and stresses from 200 to 100 MPa applied in 20-MPa increments. For comparison, 9% Cr steel with 0.1% carbon, 0.05% nitrogen, and 0.005% boron was considered. The steels were subjected to preliminary heat treatment including normalizing at 1050°C for 1 hour, tempering at 750–770°C for 3 hours, and cooling in air. The structures of both heat-treated steels exhibited martensite laths with boundaries pinned by М23С6 carbides, and the rearrangement of dislocations was retarded by MX particles. A significant difference between 10% Cr and 9% Cr steels was the presence of fine М23С6 carbide particles characterized by orientational relationships with the ferrite matrix and MX carbonitrides, whose volume fraction was 6 times lower. Short-term tensile tests at room temperature showed no differences between the steels, while the creep rupture strength of 10% Cr steel was 13% higher than for 9% Cr steel. The creep deformation mechanism of the steels was also different. Structural analysis of 10% Cr steel after creep tests revealed no substantial changes in its lath structure: the lath width increased by only 58% and the dislocation density was reduced by a factor of 2. Comparison with 9% Cr steel showed that the good structural stability of 10% Cr steel during creep is caused by the high coarsening resistance of second phase particles, whose coarsening rate is 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than that in 9% Cr steel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Mesomechanics
Physical Mesomechanics Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal provides an international medium for the publication of theoretical and experimental studies and reviews related in the physical mesomechanics and also solid-state physics, mechanics, materials science, geodynamics, non-destructive testing and in a large number of other fields where the physical mesomechanics may be used extensively. Papers dealing with the processing, characterization, structure and physical properties and computational aspects of the mesomechanics of heterogeneous media, fracture mesomechanics, physical mesomechanics of materials, mesomechanics applications for geodynamics and tectonics, mesomechanics of smart materials and materials for electronics, non-destructive testing are viewed as suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Effective Mechanical Properties of a Particle-Reinforced Polymer Composite with Low-Modulus Inclusions Absorption of Impact and Shear Energy by Crystal Lattices of Mechanically Activated Inorganic Substances: A Review Multiscale Modeling and Computer-Aided Design of Advanced Materials with Hierarchical Structure Microstructural Deformation and Fracture of Reduced Activation Ferritic-Martensitic Steel EK-181 under Different Heat Treatment Conditions Synthesis of Porous Composites Based on Electroexplosive Ti/Al Nanopowder for Bone Implants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1