谢尔曼行军途中的难民危机:萨凡纳、皇家港和海岛的变迁

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2024.a918894
Bennett Parten
{"title":"谢尔曼行军途中的难民危机:萨凡纳、皇家港和海岛的变迁","authors":"Bennett Parten","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Refugee Crisis of Sherman's March<span>Savannah, Port Royal, and the Transformation of the Sea Islands</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bennett Parten (bio) </li> </ul> <p>On Christmas 1864, Gen. Rufus Saxton spent his holiday pacing the docks along the wharf at Beaufort, South Carolina. The first \"seven hundred\" of the roughly twenty thousand freed refugees from slavery who had followed Sherman's army during its march from Atlanta to Savannah were set to arrive that afternoon. As military governor of the Department of the South, Saxton was tasked with integrating the refugees into the so-called Port Royal Experiment—an enterprise that had been ongoing since 1861, when the arrival of US gunboats prompted the region's white inhabitants to take flight, leaving behind nearly ten thousand enslaved people and a large supply of unsold cotton. Overwhelmed by only the first groups of refugees, many of whom suffered serious deprivations stemming from the long and difficult march, Saxton would later write to the freedmen's aid societies in the North for assistance. \"So extreme and entire is the destitution of this people that nothing that you can afford to give will come amiss,\" he told his audience, hoping the right amount of Northern benevolence might be enough to stave off disaster.<sup>1</sup></p> <p>Saxton, however, was unable to forestall what he so desperately wanted to avoid. The arrival of Sherman's army in Savannah transformed the self-contained <strong>[End Page 9]</strong> freedmen's colony at Port Royal into the epicenter of a sprawling refugee crisis. The influx of such a large number of refugees into the area swelled the size of the original population of freedpeople living on the islands around Port Royal. So many new inhabitants destabilized a region already in the throes of social revolution. To Saxton, the man charged with overseeing the transition, finding basic necessities like food, clothing, and shelter presented one problem; finding these items and resettling the refugees from Georgia as quasi-free laborers was another task entirely. While the refugees were eventually resettled on the islands, their arrival in the aftermath of Sherman's March set off a series of events that would ultimately reshape the nature of the project at Port Royal.</p> <p>Historians have long recognized Port Royal's central place in the history of American emancipation. It was arguably there on sandy soils of the South Carolina Sea Islands that freedom came first, making Port Royal and its environs a sort of staging ground for the trials of Reconstruction. Yet this impulse to see the islands as a laboratory for experimenting with freedom has led historians to see the region as an outpost or enclave set apart from the wider developments of the war. As such, the story of the Georgia refugees often gets folded into the larger story of the Port Royal Experiment without fully considering how Sherman's March added new, unforeseen variables and changed the nature of the project. Most easily missed in this general narrative is that Port Royal and the surrounding Sea Islands became, almost overnight, the grounds of a serious crisis. Freed refugees from as far as Atlanta and elsewhere arrived footsore and weary with little food or supplies; there was a lack of shelter and space, which necessitated expanding the project onto new islands, and new policies, primarily Sherman's Special Field Orders No. 15, led to developments that deviated from the project's original designs.<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Readers will no doubt remember some of these designs from Willie Lee Rose's classic <em>Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment</em>. Rose's was the first full-length study of the experiment, and her work, published in 1964, has framed much of the islands' wartime history. Her story, however, focused <strong>[End Page 10]</strong> primarily on the white agents who managed the project and how their competing visions concerning land, labor, humanitarian relief, and religious instruction came into constant conflict. Julie Saville and others have since reframed the narrative by focusing on how freedpeople possessed their own visions regarding the essential work of Reconstruction; other scholars have also written about Port Royal from the perspective of education and the creation of Freedmen's Schools. This essay thus brings a new story into the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Refugee Crisis of Sherman's March: Savannah, Port Royal, and the Transformation of the Sea Islands\",\"authors\":\"Bennett Parten\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Refugee Crisis of Sherman's March<span>Savannah, Port Royal, and the Transformation of the Sea Islands</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bennett Parten (bio) </li> </ul> <p>On Christmas 1864, Gen. Rufus Saxton spent his holiday pacing the docks along the wharf at Beaufort, South Carolina. The first \\\"seven hundred\\\" of the roughly twenty thousand freed refugees from slavery who had followed Sherman's army during its march from Atlanta to Savannah were set to arrive that afternoon. As military governor of the Department of the South, Saxton was tasked with integrating the refugees into the so-called Port Royal Experiment—an enterprise that had been ongoing since 1861, when the arrival of US gunboats prompted the region's white inhabitants to take flight, leaving behind nearly ten thousand enslaved people and a large supply of unsold cotton. Overwhelmed by only the first groups of refugees, many of whom suffered serious deprivations stemming from the long and difficult march, Saxton would later write to the freedmen's aid societies in the North for assistance. \\\"So extreme and entire is the destitution of this people that nothing that you can afford to give will come amiss,\\\" he told his audience, hoping the right amount of Northern benevolence might be enough to stave off disaster.<sup>1</sup></p> <p>Saxton, however, was unable to forestall what he so desperately wanted to avoid. The arrival of Sherman's army in Savannah transformed the self-contained <strong>[End Page 9]</strong> freedmen's colony at Port Royal into the epicenter of a sprawling refugee crisis. The influx of such a large number of refugees into the area swelled the size of the original population of freedpeople living on the islands around Port Royal. So many new inhabitants destabilized a region already in the throes of social revolution. To Saxton, the man charged with overseeing the transition, finding basic necessities like food, clothing, and shelter presented one problem; finding these items and resettling the refugees from Georgia as quasi-free laborers was another task entirely. While the refugees were eventually resettled on the islands, their arrival in the aftermath of Sherman's March set off a series of events that would ultimately reshape the nature of the project at Port Royal.</p> <p>Historians have long recognized Port Royal's central place in the history of American emancipation. It was arguably there on sandy soils of the South Carolina Sea Islands that freedom came first, making Port Royal and its environs a sort of staging ground for the trials of Reconstruction. Yet this impulse to see the islands as a laboratory for experimenting with freedom has led historians to see the region as an outpost or enclave set apart from the wider developments of the war. As such, the story of the Georgia refugees often gets folded into the larger story of the Port Royal Experiment without fully considering how Sherman's March added new, unforeseen variables and changed the nature of the project. Most easily missed in this general narrative is that Port Royal and the surrounding Sea Islands became, almost overnight, the grounds of a serious crisis. Freed refugees from as far as Atlanta and elsewhere arrived footsore and weary with little food or supplies; there was a lack of shelter and space, which necessitated expanding the project onto new islands, and new policies, primarily Sherman's Special Field Orders No. 15, led to developments that deviated from the project's original designs.<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Readers will no doubt remember some of these designs from Willie Lee Rose's classic <em>Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment</em>. Rose's was the first full-length study of the experiment, and her work, published in 1964, has framed much of the islands' wartime history. Her story, however, focused <strong>[End Page 10]</strong> primarily on the white agents who managed the project and how their competing visions concerning land, labor, humanitarian relief, and religious instruction came into constant conflict. Julie Saville and others have since reframed the narrative by focusing on how freedpeople possessed their own visions regarding the essential work of Reconstruction; other scholars have also written about Port Royal from the perspective of education and the creation of Freedmen's Schools. This essay thus brings a new story into the...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 谢尔曼行军中的难民危机萨凡纳、皇家港和海岛的转变 本尼特-帕尔顿(Bennett Parten)(简历 1864 年圣诞节,鲁弗斯-萨克斯顿将军(Gen. Rufus Saxton)在南卡罗来纳州博福特(Beaufort)码头踱步,度过了他的假期。在谢尔曼军队从亚特兰大向萨凡纳进军的过程中,大约两万名获得自由的奴隶制难民中的第一批 "七百人 "将于当天下午抵达。作为南方省的军事长官,萨克斯顿的任务是将这些难民融入所谓的皇家港实验--这一实验自 1861 年以来一直在进行,当时美国炮艇的到来促使该地区的白人居民逃离,留下了近万名奴隶和大量未售出的棉花。萨克斯顿后来写信给北方的自由人援助协会寻求帮助。萨克斯顿告诉他的听众:"这个民族的贫困是如此的极端和全面,以至于你们所能给予的一切都将是多余的,"他希望北方的仁慈能够避免灾难的发生。谢尔曼的军队抵达萨凡纳后,皇家港这个自给自足的自由民殖民地变成了一场无处不在的难民危机的中心。大量难民涌入该地区,使原来居住在皇家港周围岛屿上的自由民人口数量激增。如此多的新居民破坏了本已处于社会革命阵痛中的地区的稳定。对于负责监督过渡工作的萨克斯顿来说,寻找食物、衣服和住所等基本必需品是一个问题;而寻找这些物品并将来自乔治亚州的难民重新安置为准自由劳工则完全是另一项任务。虽然难民最终被安置到了岛上,但他们在谢尔曼进军之后的到来引发了一系列事件,最终重塑了皇家港项目的性质。历史学家早已认识到皇家港在美国解放史上的核心地位。可以说,正是在南卡罗来纳州海岛的沙质土壤上,自由最先降临,皇家港及其周边地区成为重建考验的集结地。然而,将群岛视为试验自由的实验室的这种冲动却导致历史学家将该地区视为前哨或飞地,与更广泛的战争发展割裂开来。因此,佐治亚难民的故事往往被纳入皇家港实验的大故事中,而没有充分考虑谢尔曼的进军如何增加了新的、不可预见的变数并改变了项目的性质。在这种笼统的叙述中,最容易被忽略的是皇家港和周围的海岛几乎在一夜之间成为了一场严重危机的发生地。从亚特兰大和其他地方远道而来的获释难民疲惫不堪,几乎没有食物和补给;由于缺乏住所和空间,有必要将项目扩展到新的岛屿上,而新的政策,主要是谢尔曼的第 15 号特别战地命令,导致项目的发展偏离了最初的设计:皇家港实验》。罗斯的著作是第一部关于该实验的长篇研究,她的作品于 1964 年出版,奠定了群岛战时历史的基础。不过,她的故事 [第 10 页完] 主要关注的是管理该项目的白人代理人,以及他们在土地、劳工、人道主义救济和宗教教育方面相互竞争的理念是如何不断发生冲突的。朱莉-萨维尔(Julie Saville)和其他人后来重新构建了这一叙事,重点关注自由民如何对重建的基本工作拥有自己的愿景;其他学者也从教育和创建自由民学校的角度撰写了有关皇家港的文章。因此,这篇文章将一个新的故事带入了对皇家港的研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Refugee Crisis of Sherman's March: Savannah, Port Royal, and the Transformation of the Sea Islands
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Refugee Crisis of Sherman's MarchSavannah, Port Royal, and the Transformation of the Sea Islands
  • Bennett Parten (bio)

On Christmas 1864, Gen. Rufus Saxton spent his holiday pacing the docks along the wharf at Beaufort, South Carolina. The first "seven hundred" of the roughly twenty thousand freed refugees from slavery who had followed Sherman's army during its march from Atlanta to Savannah were set to arrive that afternoon. As military governor of the Department of the South, Saxton was tasked with integrating the refugees into the so-called Port Royal Experiment—an enterprise that had been ongoing since 1861, when the arrival of US gunboats prompted the region's white inhabitants to take flight, leaving behind nearly ten thousand enslaved people and a large supply of unsold cotton. Overwhelmed by only the first groups of refugees, many of whom suffered serious deprivations stemming from the long and difficult march, Saxton would later write to the freedmen's aid societies in the North for assistance. "So extreme and entire is the destitution of this people that nothing that you can afford to give will come amiss," he told his audience, hoping the right amount of Northern benevolence might be enough to stave off disaster.1

Saxton, however, was unable to forestall what he so desperately wanted to avoid. The arrival of Sherman's army in Savannah transformed the self-contained [End Page 9] freedmen's colony at Port Royal into the epicenter of a sprawling refugee crisis. The influx of such a large number of refugees into the area swelled the size of the original population of freedpeople living on the islands around Port Royal. So many new inhabitants destabilized a region already in the throes of social revolution. To Saxton, the man charged with overseeing the transition, finding basic necessities like food, clothing, and shelter presented one problem; finding these items and resettling the refugees from Georgia as quasi-free laborers was another task entirely. While the refugees were eventually resettled on the islands, their arrival in the aftermath of Sherman's March set off a series of events that would ultimately reshape the nature of the project at Port Royal.

Historians have long recognized Port Royal's central place in the history of American emancipation. It was arguably there on sandy soils of the South Carolina Sea Islands that freedom came first, making Port Royal and its environs a sort of staging ground for the trials of Reconstruction. Yet this impulse to see the islands as a laboratory for experimenting with freedom has led historians to see the region as an outpost or enclave set apart from the wider developments of the war. As such, the story of the Georgia refugees often gets folded into the larger story of the Port Royal Experiment without fully considering how Sherman's March added new, unforeseen variables and changed the nature of the project. Most easily missed in this general narrative is that Port Royal and the surrounding Sea Islands became, almost overnight, the grounds of a serious crisis. Freed refugees from as far as Atlanta and elsewhere arrived footsore and weary with little food or supplies; there was a lack of shelter and space, which necessitated expanding the project onto new islands, and new policies, primarily Sherman's Special Field Orders No. 15, led to developments that deviated from the project's original designs.2

Readers will no doubt remember some of these designs from Willie Lee Rose's classic Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment. Rose's was the first full-length study of the experiment, and her work, published in 1964, has framed much of the islands' wartime history. Her story, however, focused [End Page 10] primarily on the white agents who managed the project and how their competing visions concerning land, labor, humanitarian relief, and religious instruction came into constant conflict. Julie Saville and others have since reframed the narrative by focusing on how freedpeople possessed their own visions regarding the essential work of Reconstruction; other scholars have also written about Port Royal from the perspective of education and the creation of Freedmen's Schools. This essay thus brings a new story into the...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1