"被叛军的旧罪名赶出家门":白人对白人的部族暴力与 "漫长 "的堪萨斯流血事件

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2024.a918895
Brent M. S. Campney
{"title":"\"被叛军的旧罪名赶出家门\":白人对白人的部族暴力与 \"漫长 \"的堪萨斯流血事件","authors":"Brent M. S. Campney","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> \"Driven Out on the Old Charge of Being a Rebel\"<span>White-on-White Sectional Violence and the \"Long\" Bleeding Kansas</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brent M. S. Campney (bio) </li> </ul> <p>\"Desperado Hung,\" blared the <em>Emporia News</em> on February 8, 1867, after white townspeople in nearby Council Grove hanged Jack McDowell, a fellow white man whom they accused of having been a bushwhacker during the American Civil War. To justify their actions, they claimed McDowell had been part of the guerrilla band that, under the leadership of William Clarke Quantrill, had burned Lawrence, Kansas, in 1863 and killed a minimum of 150 men and boys. They based their justification on thin evidence, including the following: \"When being brought down from Omaha [he] begged not to be brought through Lawrence, as he would be recognized there and hung. This circumstance seems to establish the general suspicion that he was a member of the Quantrell gang.\" Although the <em>News</em> professed to regret mob violence, it accepted the result: \"From the best evidence that could be procured this McDowell was a thief of long standing, and one of the old Missouri bushwhackers, and if hanging by the people could ever be excused[,] it could in this case.\"<sup>1</sup></p> <p>The lynching of an accused pro-Confederate bushwhacker by a unionist mob in Kansas early in Reconstruction reveals a violent dynamic rarely investigated—violence perpetrated by white Northerners against white Southerners in Bleeding Kansas during the 1850s and 1860s. In the historiography of <strong>[End Page 27]</strong> the Kansas Territory, historians tend to examine the intimidation by proslavery Missourians against the antislavery settlers from the Northeast and Midwest and the responses of the latter. In the historiography on Civil War violence on the Kansas-Missouri border, they tend to emphasize Missouri, where endemic guerrilla violence and neighbor-on-neighbor partisan strife raged. In the historiography on Kansas, they investigate attacks within the state by pro-Confederate guerrillas invading from Missouri. Responding to these biases, and focusing on the Civil War years and early Reconstruction, this study shifts the focus away from the intimidation of the proslavery forces and onto that perpetrated by free staters, away from Missouri and onto Kansas itself, and within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves.<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Although this essay incorporates the better-known story of the violence perpetrated by white Southerners against white Northerners, it focuses on the under-investigated story of mob violence by white Northerners against their white Southern counterparts or against those suspected of working in cahoots with them. Covering a seven-year period at the backend of what it calls the \"long\" Bleeding Kansas, the study examines an eventful time between 1861 and 1867 when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates—and ultimately war. It also examines how white Northerners first of necessity made an uneasy alliance with the free and fugitive Blacks from Missouri primarily, and then, once they had prevailed over their white adversaries, turned against their erstwhile Black allies with a campaign of white supremacist violence.</p> <p>When Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, it reversed the 1820 Missouri Compromise, which had arrested the expansion of slavery in the territories north of 36º 30<sup>′</sup> and left the status of slavery in Kansas to those white citizens who settled the state. In so doing, it aggravated the sectional and ideological tensions over the westward extension of slavery during the 1850s and precipitated the fevered migration of partisans on both sides. Proslavery settlers, many of them from the adjacent slave state of Missouri, others from <strong>[End Page 28]</strong> Kentucky and Tennessee, and some from the Deep South, moved into the state to establish their right to move the Peculiar Institution westward. Some of the Missourians simply crossed the border to intimidate free state settlers, perpetrate voter fraud, and cast ballots for the proslavery ticket. In so doing, they ensured that the first territorial government of Kansas would establish a slave code aimed at punishing harshly anyone convicted of undermining the system of enslavement.</p> <p>Simultaneously, Northern white settlers migrated westward. In 1854, ardent abolitionists and capitalists alike from New England and New York moved west to make Kansas a...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Driven Out on the Old Charge of Being a Rebel\\\": White-on-White Sectional Violence and the \\\"Long\\\" Bleeding Kansas\",\"authors\":\"Brent M. S. Campney\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> \\\"Driven Out on the Old Charge of Being a Rebel\\\"<span>White-on-White Sectional Violence and the \\\"Long\\\" Bleeding Kansas</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Brent M. S. Campney (bio) </li> </ul> <p>\\\"Desperado Hung,\\\" blared the <em>Emporia News</em> on February 8, 1867, after white townspeople in nearby Council Grove hanged Jack McDowell, a fellow white man whom they accused of having been a bushwhacker during the American Civil War. To justify their actions, they claimed McDowell had been part of the guerrilla band that, under the leadership of William Clarke Quantrill, had burned Lawrence, Kansas, in 1863 and killed a minimum of 150 men and boys. They based their justification on thin evidence, including the following: \\\"When being brought down from Omaha [he] begged not to be brought through Lawrence, as he would be recognized there and hung. This circumstance seems to establish the general suspicion that he was a member of the Quantrell gang.\\\" Although the <em>News</em> professed to regret mob violence, it accepted the result: \\\"From the best evidence that could be procured this McDowell was a thief of long standing, and one of the old Missouri bushwhackers, and if hanging by the people could ever be excused[,] it could in this case.\\\"<sup>1</sup></p> <p>The lynching of an accused pro-Confederate bushwhacker by a unionist mob in Kansas early in Reconstruction reveals a violent dynamic rarely investigated—violence perpetrated by white Northerners against white Southerners in Bleeding Kansas during the 1850s and 1860s. In the historiography of <strong>[End Page 27]</strong> the Kansas Territory, historians tend to examine the intimidation by proslavery Missourians against the antislavery settlers from the Northeast and Midwest and the responses of the latter. In the historiography on Civil War violence on the Kansas-Missouri border, they tend to emphasize Missouri, where endemic guerrilla violence and neighbor-on-neighbor partisan strife raged. In the historiography on Kansas, they investigate attacks within the state by pro-Confederate guerrillas invading from Missouri. Responding to these biases, and focusing on the Civil War years and early Reconstruction, this study shifts the focus away from the intimidation of the proslavery forces and onto that perpetrated by free staters, away from Missouri and onto Kansas itself, and within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves.<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Although this essay incorporates the better-known story of the violence perpetrated by white Southerners against white Northerners, it focuses on the under-investigated story of mob violence by white Northerners against their white Southern counterparts or against those suspected of working in cahoots with them. Covering a seven-year period at the backend of what it calls the \\\"long\\\" Bleeding Kansas, the study examines an eventful time between 1861 and 1867 when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates—and ultimately war. It also examines how white Northerners first of necessity made an uneasy alliance with the free and fugitive Blacks from Missouri primarily, and then, once they had prevailed over their white adversaries, turned against their erstwhile Black allies with a campaign of white supremacist violence.</p> <p>When Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, it reversed the 1820 Missouri Compromise, which had arrested the expansion of slavery in the territories north of 36º 30<sup>′</sup> and left the status of slavery in Kansas to those white citizens who settled the state. In so doing, it aggravated the sectional and ideological tensions over the westward extension of slavery during the 1850s and precipitated the fevered migration of partisans on both sides. Proslavery settlers, many of them from the adjacent slave state of Missouri, others from <strong>[End Page 28]</strong> Kentucky and Tennessee, and some from the Deep South, moved into the state to establish their right to move the Peculiar Institution westward. Some of the Missourians simply crossed the border to intimidate free state settlers, perpetrate voter fraud, and cast ballots for the proslavery ticket. In so doing, they ensured that the first territorial government of Kansas would establish a slave code aimed at punishing harshly anyone convicted of undermining the system of enslavement.</p> <p>Simultaneously, Northern white settlers migrated westward. In 1854, ardent abolitionists and capitalists alike from New England and New York moved west to make Kansas a...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918895\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容简介,以代替摘要: "1867 年 2 月 8 日,《恩波利亚新闻》(Emporia News)上刊登了这样一则消息:附近理事会格罗夫(Council Grove)的白人镇民绞死了白人同胞杰克-麦克道尔(Jack McDowell),他们指控麦克道尔在美国内战期间曾是一名丛林袭击者。为了给自己的行为辩解,他们声称麦克道尔是游击队的一员,在威廉-克拉克-匡特里尔的领导下,游击队于 1863 年烧毁了堪萨斯州的劳伦斯,至少杀害了 150 名男子和男孩。他们的理由证据不足,其中包括以下内容:"从奥马哈被带下来时,[他]乞求不要经过劳伦斯,因为他会在那里被认出并被吊死。这一情况似乎证实了人们普遍怀疑他是匡特雷尔团伙的成员"。尽管《新闻报》对暴民的暴力行为表示遗憾,但它还是接受了这一结果:根据所能获得的最佳证据,这个麦克道尔是一个久负盛名的盗贼,也是密苏里州的老牌丛林杀手之一,如果说人民的绞刑是可以原谅的[],那么在这个案件中也是可以原谅的。"1 在重建初期,堪萨斯州的工会暴民对一名被指控的亲同盟丛林杀手处以私刑,揭示了一种很少被调查的暴力动态--19 世纪 50 年代和 60 年代,在 "流血的堪萨斯",北方白人对南方白人实施的暴力。在堪萨斯地区的 [第 27 页结束] 史学研究中,历史学家倾向于研究支持奴隶制的密苏里人对来自东北部和中西部的反奴隶制定居者的恐吓,以及后者的反应。在关于堪萨斯州与密苏里州边境内战暴力的史学研究中,他们倾向于强调密苏里州,因为那里的游击队暴力和邻里之间的党派纷争十分猖獗。在有关堪萨斯州的史料中,他们调查了从密苏里州入侵的亲联邦游击队在该州发动的袭击。为了回应这些偏见,本研究将重点放在南北战争时期和重建初期,将焦点从支持奴隶制的势力的恐吓转移到自由州人的恐吓,从密苏里转移到堪萨斯州本身,并将堪萨斯州内的焦点转移到白人堪萨斯人之间的内斗。尽管这篇文章包含了南方白人对北方白人施暴这一广为人知的故事,但它重点关注的是北方白人对南方白人或涉嫌与南方白人勾结的暴徒施暴这一调查不足的故事。该研究涵盖了被称为 "漫长 "的 "流血的堪萨斯 "后期的七年时间,探讨了 1861 年至 1867 年间的多事之秋,当时北方白人与南方白人在迅速而深刻变化的州和国家辩论中争夺权力,最终爆发了战争。报告还探讨了北方白人如何首先被迫与主要来自密苏里州的自由黑人和逃亡黑人结成不稳定的联盟,然后在战胜白人对手后,又如何通过白人至上主义的暴力活动来反对他们昔日的黑人盟友。1854 年,国会通过了《堪萨斯-内布拉斯加法案》,推翻了 1820 年的《密苏里妥协法案》,该法案阻止了奴隶制在 36º 30′ 以北地区的扩张,并将堪萨斯州的奴隶制地位留给了在该州定居的白人公民。这样做加剧了 19 世纪 50 年代在奴隶制向西扩张问题上的派别和意识形态矛盾,并引发了双方游击队员的疯狂迁徙。支持奴隶制的定居者,其中许多人来自毗邻的奴隶制州密苏里州,还有一些人来自肯塔基州和田纳西州,还有一些人来自南方深处,他们迁入密苏里州,以确立自己将特殊制度西迁的权利。有些密苏里人干脆越过边境,恐吓自由州的定居者,进行选民欺诈,为支持奴隶制的选民投票。他们这样做确保了堪萨斯州的第一个领地政府将制定一部奴隶法典,旨在严惩任何被判定破坏奴役制度的人。与此同时,北方白人定居者向西迁移。1854 年,来自新英格兰和纽约的热心废奴主义者和资本家纷纷西迁,将堪萨斯州变成了一个...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Driven Out on the Old Charge of Being a Rebel": White-on-White Sectional Violence and the "Long" Bleeding Kansas
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • "Driven Out on the Old Charge of Being a Rebel"White-on-White Sectional Violence and the "Long" Bleeding Kansas
  • Brent M. S. Campney (bio)

"Desperado Hung," blared the Emporia News on February 8, 1867, after white townspeople in nearby Council Grove hanged Jack McDowell, a fellow white man whom they accused of having been a bushwhacker during the American Civil War. To justify their actions, they claimed McDowell had been part of the guerrilla band that, under the leadership of William Clarke Quantrill, had burned Lawrence, Kansas, in 1863 and killed a minimum of 150 men and boys. They based their justification on thin evidence, including the following: "When being brought down from Omaha [he] begged not to be brought through Lawrence, as he would be recognized there and hung. This circumstance seems to establish the general suspicion that he was a member of the Quantrell gang." Although the News professed to regret mob violence, it accepted the result: "From the best evidence that could be procured this McDowell was a thief of long standing, and one of the old Missouri bushwhackers, and if hanging by the people could ever be excused[,] it could in this case."1

The lynching of an accused pro-Confederate bushwhacker by a unionist mob in Kansas early in Reconstruction reveals a violent dynamic rarely investigated—violence perpetrated by white Northerners against white Southerners in Bleeding Kansas during the 1850s and 1860s. In the historiography of [End Page 27] the Kansas Territory, historians tend to examine the intimidation by proslavery Missourians against the antislavery settlers from the Northeast and Midwest and the responses of the latter. In the historiography on Civil War violence on the Kansas-Missouri border, they tend to emphasize Missouri, where endemic guerrilla violence and neighbor-on-neighbor partisan strife raged. In the historiography on Kansas, they investigate attacks within the state by pro-Confederate guerrillas invading from Missouri. Responding to these biases, and focusing on the Civil War years and early Reconstruction, this study shifts the focus away from the intimidation of the proslavery forces and onto that perpetrated by free staters, away from Missouri and onto Kansas itself, and within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves.2

Although this essay incorporates the better-known story of the violence perpetrated by white Southerners against white Northerners, it focuses on the under-investigated story of mob violence by white Northerners against their white Southern counterparts or against those suspected of working in cahoots with them. Covering a seven-year period at the backend of what it calls the "long" Bleeding Kansas, the study examines an eventful time between 1861 and 1867 when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates—and ultimately war. It also examines how white Northerners first of necessity made an uneasy alliance with the free and fugitive Blacks from Missouri primarily, and then, once they had prevailed over their white adversaries, turned against their erstwhile Black allies with a campaign of white supremacist violence.

When Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, it reversed the 1820 Missouri Compromise, which had arrested the expansion of slavery in the territories north of 36º 30 and left the status of slavery in Kansas to those white citizens who settled the state. In so doing, it aggravated the sectional and ideological tensions over the westward extension of slavery during the 1850s and precipitated the fevered migration of partisans on both sides. Proslavery settlers, many of them from the adjacent slave state of Missouri, others from [End Page 28] Kentucky and Tennessee, and some from the Deep South, moved into the state to establish their right to move the Peculiar Institution westward. Some of the Missourians simply crossed the border to intimidate free state settlers, perpetrate voter fraud, and cast ballots for the proslavery ticket. In so doing, they ensured that the first territorial government of Kansas would establish a slave code aimed at punishing harshly anyone convicted of undermining the system of enslavement.

Simultaneously, Northern white settlers migrated westward. In 1854, ardent abolitionists and capitalists alike from New England and New York moved west to make Kansas a...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1