{"title":"沃顿的战争:1863-1865 年加布里埃尔-C-沃顿将军和安妮-拉德福德-沃顿的内战通信》,William C. Davis 和 Sue Heth Bell 编(评论)","authors":"Jonathan A. Noyalas","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865</em> ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jonathan A. Noyalas (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865</em>. Edited by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. ISBN: 978-1-4696-6829-1, 456 pp., paper, $45.00. <p>Near the end of his life, former Confederate general Gabriel Wharton took time to reread the wartime correspondence he had exchanged with his wife, Nannie. After revisiting the 524 letters the two sent to each other between March 8, 1863, and June 21, 1865, Wharton penned a simple note instructing his heirs to destroy the correspondence upon his death. While no one, fortunately, carried out Wharton's instructions, the content-rich letters resided in obscurity until by Sue Heth Bell, one of Wharton's descendants, discovered them recently.</p> <p>While historians interested in military operations in the Old Dominion, particularly southwestern Virginia and the Shenandoah Valley, will find much useful material throughout these letters, smartly edited by Bell and William C. \"Jack\" Davis, one of the most prolific Civil War historians of our time, this volume offers significantly more than a recounting of military events, weather conditions, and war's impact on the landscape.</p> <p>Foremost, these letters reveal the difficulties married couples confronted during the conflict. Married on May 14, 1863, the two spent considerably little <strong>[End Page 84]</strong> time together during their first two years. Loneliness, fear, and frustration consumed both. Sometimes those emotions compelled one to lash out at the other. For instance, on December 15, 1864, Nannie expressed anger over her husband's inability to get away from the army and spend time with her and their infant son, William, born on June 11, 1864. She threatened to cease communicating with Gabriel until he spent time with them. However, she soon realized the folly of her ultimatum and apologized for threatening to cut off the only means the two had of building their relationship.</p> <p>Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this collection offers an intriguing case study of the limits of Confederate patriotism. While the Whartons might not be representative of the entire Confederacy, their letters clearly demonstrate that battlefield success, lack of recognition for duty well performed, and the Confederacy's political landscape affected one's devotion to the Confederacy. While Gabriel expressed more optimism than Nannie about the South's prospects, even in the aftermath of catastrophic defeats, the honest and candid exchanges between the two clearly demonstrate that as defeats became more frequent, casualties mounted, and Gabriel did not receive the promotions he deserved, their support waned. On various occasions, both expressed a desire to abandon the Confederacy and move to a place where they could live peacefully. The Confederate government's policy of impressment further chipped away at the couple's loyalty.</p> <p>Throughout her letters, Nannie held nothing back in criticizing some of the Confederacy's top military figures. For example, in the aftermath of the Army of Northern Virginia's defeat at Gettysburg, Nannie expressed her disdain for Gen. Robert E. Lee. Perhaps this was one of the reasons General Wharton desired the letters be burned after his death, as he possessed much admiration for Lee and counseled his wife to fully support the man. Sometimes, however, the Whartons agreed about the abilities of Confederate officers, most notably Lt. Gen. Jubal Early. While Wharton, who commanded a division in Early's corps believed Early worthy of every praise following his advance to Washington's outskirts in mid-July 1864, both Nannie and Gabriel thought it time for Early's resignation following a string of disasters in the Shenandoah Valley in the autumn of 1864.</p> <p>While the collection's core offers important perspectives on the limits of Confederate patriotism and how couples navigated war's myriad challenges, the letters offer insight into other topics of interest to historians, most notably the experiences of enslaved people. Through mentions of Emiline and Tim, two people whom the Whartons enslaved, the letters reveal how enslaved people balanced their desire for freedom...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"85-86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865 ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell (review)\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan A. Noyalas\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865</em> ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jonathan A. Noyalas (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865</em>. Edited by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. ISBN: 978-1-4696-6829-1, 456 pp., paper, $45.00. <p>Near the end of his life, former Confederate general Gabriel Wharton took time to reread the wartime correspondence he had exchanged with his wife, Nannie. After revisiting the 524 letters the two sent to each other between March 8, 1863, and June 21, 1865, Wharton penned a simple note instructing his heirs to destroy the correspondence upon his death. While no one, fortunately, carried out Wharton's instructions, the content-rich letters resided in obscurity until by Sue Heth Bell, one of Wharton's descendants, discovered them recently.</p> <p>While historians interested in military operations in the Old Dominion, particularly southwestern Virginia and the Shenandoah Valley, will find much useful material throughout these letters, smartly edited by Bell and William C. \\\"Jack\\\" Davis, one of the most prolific Civil War historians of our time, this volume offers significantly more than a recounting of military events, weather conditions, and war's impact on the landscape.</p> <p>Foremost, these letters reveal the difficulties married couples confronted during the conflict. Married on May 14, 1863, the two spent considerably little <strong>[End Page 84]</strong> time together during their first two years. Loneliness, fear, and frustration consumed both. Sometimes those emotions compelled one to lash out at the other. For instance, on December 15, 1864, Nannie expressed anger over her husband's inability to get away from the army and spend time with her and their infant son, William, born on June 11, 1864. She threatened to cease communicating with Gabriel until he spent time with them. However, she soon realized the folly of her ultimatum and apologized for threatening to cut off the only means the two had of building their relationship.</p> <p>Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this collection offers an intriguing case study of the limits of Confederate patriotism. While the Whartons might not be representative of the entire Confederacy, their letters clearly demonstrate that battlefield success, lack of recognition for duty well performed, and the Confederacy's political landscape affected one's devotion to the Confederacy. While Gabriel expressed more optimism than Nannie about the South's prospects, even in the aftermath of catastrophic defeats, the honest and candid exchanges between the two clearly demonstrate that as defeats became more frequent, casualties mounted, and Gabriel did not receive the promotions he deserved, their support waned. On various occasions, both expressed a desire to abandon the Confederacy and move to a place where they could live peacefully. The Confederate government's policy of impressment further chipped away at the couple's loyalty.</p> <p>Throughout her letters, Nannie held nothing back in criticizing some of the Confederacy's top military figures. For example, in the aftermath of the Army of Northern Virginia's defeat at Gettysburg, Nannie expressed her disdain for Gen. Robert E. Lee. Perhaps this was one of the reasons General Wharton desired the letters be burned after his death, as he possessed much admiration for Lee and counseled his wife to fully support the man. Sometimes, however, the Whartons agreed about the abilities of Confederate officers, most notably Lt. Gen. Jubal Early. While Wharton, who commanded a division in Early's corps believed Early worthy of every praise following his advance to Washington's outskirts in mid-July 1864, both Nannie and Gabriel thought it time for Early's resignation following a string of disasters in the Shenandoah Valley in the autumn of 1864.</p> <p>While the collection's core offers important perspectives on the limits of Confederate patriotism and how couples navigated war's myriad challenges, the letters offer insight into other topics of interest to historians, most notably the experiences of enslaved people. Through mentions of Emiline and Tim, two people whom the Whartons enslaved, the letters reveal how enslaved people balanced their desire for freedom...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"85-86 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918901\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863-1865 ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell Jonathan A. Noyalas (bio) The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863-1865.William C. Davis 和 Sue Heth Bell 编辑。教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022 年。ISBN:978-1-4696-6829-1,456 页,纸质版,45.00 美元。前南军将领加布里埃尔-沃顿(Gabriel Wharton)在生命即将结束时,抽空重读了他与妻子南妮的战时书信往来。在重温了 1863 年 3 月 8 日至 1865 年 6 月 21 日期间两人互寄的 524 封信件后,沃顿写了一张简单的便条,嘱咐他的继承人在他死后销毁这些信件。幸运的是,没有人执行沃顿的指示,这些内容丰富的信件一直默默无闻,直到沃顿的后人之一苏-赫斯-贝尔(Sue Heth Bell)最近发现了它们。贝尔和当代最多产的内战史学家之一威廉-C-"杰克"-戴维斯(William C. "Jack" Davis)对这些信件进行了精心编辑,对老多米尼克地区,尤其是弗吉尼亚州西南部和谢南多纳河谷的军事行动感兴趣的历史学家可以在这些信件中找到许多有用的资料,而这本书所提供的远不止是对军事事件、天气状况以及战争对地貌影响的描述。最重要的是,这些信件揭示了已婚夫妇在冲突期间所面临的困难。他们于 1863 年 5 月 14 日结婚,在最初的两年里,两人在一起的时间非常少 [第 84 页结束]。孤独、恐惧和挫败感笼罩着两人。有时,这些情绪会迫使一个人向另一个人发泄。例如,1864 年 12 月 15 日,南妮对丈夫无法离开军队陪伴她和 1864 年 6 月 11 日出生的幼子威廉表示愤怒。她威胁要停止与加布里埃尔的通信,直到他抽出时间来陪伴他们。然而,她很快意识到自己的最后通牒是愚蠢的,并为威胁切断两人建立关系的唯一途径而道歉。此外,也许最重要的是,这本小说集提供了一个关于邦联爱国主义局限性的有趣案例研究。虽然沃顿夫妇可能并不能代表整个邦联,但他们的书信清楚地表明,战场上的胜利、因出色完成任务而得不到认可以及邦联的政治格局都会影响一个人对邦联的忠诚度。虽然加布里埃尔比南妮更看好南方的前景,即使是在灾难性的失败之后,但两人之间真诚坦率的交流清楚地表明,随着失败越来越频繁,伤亡越来越大,加布里埃尔没有得到应有的晋升,他们的支持也在减弱。在不同的场合,两人都表示希望放弃南方联盟,搬到一个可以安居乐业的地方。邦联政府的征兵政策进一步削弱了这对夫妇的忠诚。在她的信中,南妮毫不留情地批评了邦联的一些高层军事人物。例如,北弗吉尼亚军在葛底斯堡战败后,南妮表达了对罗伯特-李将军的蔑视。也许这就是沃顿将军希望在死后将这些信件烧掉的原因之一,因为他非常钦佩李将军,并建议妻子全力支持他。不过,有时候,沃顿夫妇也会对南军军官的能力表示赞同,其中最著名的是朱巴尔-厄尔利中将。1864 年 7 月中旬,在厄尔利军团中指挥一个师的沃顿认为,厄尔利在向华盛顿郊区推进后值得一赞,但 1864 年秋天,在谢南多河谷发生一连串灾难后,南妮和加布里埃尔都认为厄尔利该辞职了。这批藏品的核心内容提供了关于邦联爱国主义局限性以及夫妇如何应对战争中无数挑战的重要视角,同时,这些信件还提供了历史学家对其他主题的洞察力,其中最值得注意的是被奴役者的经历。通过提到埃米琳和蒂姆这两个被沃顿夫妇奴役的人,这些信件揭示了被奴役者如何平衡他们对自由的渴望......
The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865 ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865 ed. by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell
Jonathan A. Noyalas (bio)
The Whartons' War: The Civil War Correspondence of General Gabriel C. Wharton & Anne Radford Wharton 1863–1865. Edited by William C. Davis and Sue Heth Bell. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. ISBN: 978-1-4696-6829-1, 456 pp., paper, $45.00.
Near the end of his life, former Confederate general Gabriel Wharton took time to reread the wartime correspondence he had exchanged with his wife, Nannie. After revisiting the 524 letters the two sent to each other between March 8, 1863, and June 21, 1865, Wharton penned a simple note instructing his heirs to destroy the correspondence upon his death. While no one, fortunately, carried out Wharton's instructions, the content-rich letters resided in obscurity until by Sue Heth Bell, one of Wharton's descendants, discovered them recently.
While historians interested in military operations in the Old Dominion, particularly southwestern Virginia and the Shenandoah Valley, will find much useful material throughout these letters, smartly edited by Bell and William C. "Jack" Davis, one of the most prolific Civil War historians of our time, this volume offers significantly more than a recounting of military events, weather conditions, and war's impact on the landscape.
Foremost, these letters reveal the difficulties married couples confronted during the conflict. Married on May 14, 1863, the two spent considerably little [End Page 84] time together during their first two years. Loneliness, fear, and frustration consumed both. Sometimes those emotions compelled one to lash out at the other. For instance, on December 15, 1864, Nannie expressed anger over her husband's inability to get away from the army and spend time with her and their infant son, William, born on June 11, 1864. She threatened to cease communicating with Gabriel until he spent time with them. However, she soon realized the folly of her ultimatum and apologized for threatening to cut off the only means the two had of building their relationship.
Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, this collection offers an intriguing case study of the limits of Confederate patriotism. While the Whartons might not be representative of the entire Confederacy, their letters clearly demonstrate that battlefield success, lack of recognition for duty well performed, and the Confederacy's political landscape affected one's devotion to the Confederacy. While Gabriel expressed more optimism than Nannie about the South's prospects, even in the aftermath of catastrophic defeats, the honest and candid exchanges between the two clearly demonstrate that as defeats became more frequent, casualties mounted, and Gabriel did not receive the promotions he deserved, their support waned. On various occasions, both expressed a desire to abandon the Confederacy and move to a place where they could live peacefully. The Confederate government's policy of impressment further chipped away at the couple's loyalty.
Throughout her letters, Nannie held nothing back in criticizing some of the Confederacy's top military figures. For example, in the aftermath of the Army of Northern Virginia's defeat at Gettysburg, Nannie expressed her disdain for Gen. Robert E. Lee. Perhaps this was one of the reasons General Wharton desired the letters be burned after his death, as he possessed much admiration for Lee and counseled his wife to fully support the man. Sometimes, however, the Whartons agreed about the abilities of Confederate officers, most notably Lt. Gen. Jubal Early. While Wharton, who commanded a division in Early's corps believed Early worthy of every praise following his advance to Washington's outskirts in mid-July 1864, both Nannie and Gabriel thought it time for Early's resignation following a string of disasters in the Shenandoah Valley in the autumn of 1864.
While the collection's core offers important perspectives on the limits of Confederate patriotism and how couples navigated war's myriad challenges, the letters offer insight into other topics of interest to historians, most notably the experiences of enslaved people. Through mentions of Emiline and Tim, two people whom the Whartons enslaved, the letters reveal how enslaved people balanced their desire for freedom...
期刊介绍:
Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.