编辑概述

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2024.a918893
{"title":"编辑概述","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Editor's Overview <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>In 2004, in response to the prolific scholarship on the Civil War, distinguished historian Drew Gilpin Faust published \"'We Should Grow Too Fond of It': Why We Love the Civil War,\" in this journal. It immediately became canonical. Twenty years later, as editor, I wanted to know if we still love the Civil War. It remains a core part of scholarship, teaching, and reading for so many of us. but has the Civil War lost some of its appeal? To answer this question, I organized a round-table with some of the world's leading thinkers about the Civil War. We were fortunate enough to get Drew Faust to join the conversation!</p> <p>Also, in the issue are two terrific contributions to Civil War–era studies. The first, by Bennett Parten, brings to light the nearly twenty thousand formerly enslaved refugees who followed Gen. William T. Sherman's famous March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah. Building on the expanding raft of studies on emancipation, which he refers to as the \"refugee turn,\" Parten challenges Willie Lee Rose's classic 1964 study <em>Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment</em>, which shoehorns the Georgia refugees into the Port Royal experiment without realizing how their migration and displacement distinguished them from the freedpeople living on the Sea Islands. Pushing against the federal government's idea that the messiness of wartime emancipation could be easily rectified, Parten insists that the refugee framework better explains their status after slavery.</p> <p>Also upending traditional interpretations of the Civil War era, Brent Campney exposes how white Northerners engaged in mob violence against white Southerners in Kansas, flipping the familiar script of white Southerners attacking white Northerners. Setting his attention \"within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves,\" Campney covers a seven-year period \"when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates.\" By emphasizing newspaper accounts of the conflicts in Kansas, Campney reconstructs the violence that shaped Kansas's political history during the Civil War era and in so doing expands the temporal parameters of Bleeding Kansas.</p> <p>The book review section, as always, delivers an exciting cast of reviews that would not be possible without Sarah Gardner's impeccable leadership and incisive editing. Brie Swenson Arnold reviews J. Matthew Gallman's much anticipated book on Democrats in the North during the Civil War, <em>The Cacophony of</em> <strong>[End Page 7]</strong> <em>Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War</em>, and Jonathan S. Jones reviews Megan L. Bever's insightful study, <em>At War with King Alcohol: Debating Drinking and Masculinity in the Civil War</em>. The issue includes many other excellent reviews. Since becoming editor, I have had the great honor each year to publish eminent historian Nell Painter's artwork on the cover of the journal. For all 2024 issues, the cover, in Painter's words, will be \"Arrived New Names 2, 2022, ink on paper 12<sup>″</sup> × 9<sup>″</sup>, belonging to a suite of drawings inspired by <em>William Still's Journal</em> of interviews Still made with people self-emancipating from Southern enslavement. The original drawing, along with the lithographed <em>William Still Triptych</em>, is in the permanent collection of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.\" <strong>[End Page 8]</strong></p> Copyright © 2024 The Kent State University Press ... </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor's Overview\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2024.a918893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Editor's Overview <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p>In 2004, in response to the prolific scholarship on the Civil War, distinguished historian Drew Gilpin Faust published \\\"'We Should Grow Too Fond of It': Why We Love the Civil War,\\\" in this journal. It immediately became canonical. Twenty years later, as editor, I wanted to know if we still love the Civil War. It remains a core part of scholarship, teaching, and reading for so many of us. but has the Civil War lost some of its appeal? To answer this question, I organized a round-table with some of the world's leading thinkers about the Civil War. We were fortunate enough to get Drew Faust to join the conversation!</p> <p>Also, in the issue are two terrific contributions to Civil War–era studies. The first, by Bennett Parten, brings to light the nearly twenty thousand formerly enslaved refugees who followed Gen. William T. Sherman's famous March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah. Building on the expanding raft of studies on emancipation, which he refers to as the \\\"refugee turn,\\\" Parten challenges Willie Lee Rose's classic 1964 study <em>Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment</em>, which shoehorns the Georgia refugees into the Port Royal experiment without realizing how their migration and displacement distinguished them from the freedpeople living on the Sea Islands. Pushing against the federal government's idea that the messiness of wartime emancipation could be easily rectified, Parten insists that the refugee framework better explains their status after slavery.</p> <p>Also upending traditional interpretations of the Civil War era, Brent Campney exposes how white Northerners engaged in mob violence against white Southerners in Kansas, flipping the familiar script of white Southerners attacking white Northerners. Setting his attention \\\"within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves,\\\" Campney covers a seven-year period \\\"when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates.\\\" By emphasizing newspaper accounts of the conflicts in Kansas, Campney reconstructs the violence that shaped Kansas's political history during the Civil War era and in so doing expands the temporal parameters of Bleeding Kansas.</p> <p>The book review section, as always, delivers an exciting cast of reviews that would not be possible without Sarah Gardner's impeccable leadership and incisive editing. Brie Swenson Arnold reviews J. Matthew Gallman's much anticipated book on Democrats in the North during the Civil War, <em>The Cacophony of</em> <strong>[End Page 7]</strong> <em>Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War</em>, and Jonathan S. Jones reviews Megan L. Bever's insightful study, <em>At War with King Alcohol: Debating Drinking and Masculinity in the Civil War</em>. The issue includes many other excellent reviews. Since becoming editor, I have had the great honor each year to publish eminent historian Nell Painter's artwork on the cover of the journal. For all 2024 issues, the cover, in Painter's words, will be \\\"Arrived New Names 2, 2022, ink on paper 12<sup>″</sup> × 9<sup>″</sup>, belonging to a suite of drawings inspired by <em>William Still's Journal</em> of interviews Still made with people self-emancipating from Southern enslavement. The original drawing, along with the lithographed <em>William Still Triptych</em>, is in the permanent collection of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.\\\" <strong>[End Page 8]</strong></p> Copyright © 2024 The Kent State University Press ... </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918893\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2024.a918893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 编辑综述 2004 年,针对有关南北战争的大量学术研究,著名历史学家德鲁-吉尔平-福斯特(Drew Gilpin Faust)在本刊发表了"'我们应该越来越喜欢它':我们为何热爱内战》一文。这篇文章立即成为经典。二十年后,作为编辑,我想知道我们是否仍然热爱内战。内战仍然是我们许多人学术、教学和阅读的核心部分。但内战是否已经失去了一些吸引力?为了回答这个问题,我组织了一次圆桌会议,邀请了一些世界顶尖的内战思想家。我们有幸邀请到了德鲁-浮士德参加对话!此外,本期还刊登了两篇关于内战时期研究的精彩文章。第一篇是贝内特-帕尔顿(Bennett Parten)撰写的,介绍了跟随威廉-谢尔曼将军著名的 "海上行军 "从亚特兰大到萨凡纳的近两万名曾受奴役的难民。帕尔顿将解放问题研究称为 "难民转向",在此基础上,他对威利-李-罗斯(Willie Lee Rose)1964 年的经典研究《重建排练》(Rehearsal for Reconstruction)提出了质疑:该书将佐治亚难民硬塞进皇家港实验中,却没有意识到他们的迁移和流离失所与生活在海岛上的自由人有何不同。帕腾反对联邦政府认为战时解放的混乱局面可以轻松纠正的想法,坚持认为难民框架更能解释他们在奴隶制之后的地位。布伦特-坎普尼(Brent Campney)也颠覆了对内战时期的传统解释,他揭露了北方白人如何在堪萨斯州对南方白人实施暴民暴力,颠覆了南方白人攻击北方白人这一耳熟能详的剧本。坎普尼将他的注意力 "放在堪萨斯州内白人之间的自相残杀上","在迅速而深刻变化的州和全国辩论中","北方白人与南方白人争夺权力 "的七年期间。通过强调报纸对堪萨斯州冲突的报道,坎普尼重构了南北战争时期影响堪萨斯州政治历史的暴力事件,从而拓展了《流血的堪萨斯州》的时间范围。书评部分一如既往地提供了令人兴奋的书评,如果没有莎拉-加德纳无可挑剔的领导和精辟的编辑,这些书评是不可能出现的。布里-斯文森-阿诺德评论了马修-加尔曼(J. Matthew Gallman)备受期待的关于南北战争期间北方民主党人的著作《政治的喧哗》(The Cacophony of [End Page 7] Politics):乔纳森-S-琼斯(Jonathan S. Jones)评论了梅根-L-贝弗(Megan L. Bever)富有洞察力的研究报告《与酒王开战》(At War with King Alcohol:内战中的饮酒与男性气质辩论》。本期还收录了许多其他出色的评论文章。自从担任编辑以来,我每年都非常荣幸地在期刊封面上刊登著名历史学家内尔-佩因特(Nell Painter)的作品。2024 年所有期刊的封面,用画家的话说,将是 "2022 年《新名称 2 号》,纸上水墨 12″ × 9″,属于威廉-斯蒂尔的《斯蒂尔采访记》启发下的一套绘画,斯蒂尔采访了从南方奴役中自我解放的人们。原画和石版印刷的《威廉-斯蒂尔三联画》被宾夕法尼亚州历史学会永久收藏。[第 8 页完] Copyright © 2024 肯特州立大学出版社 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor's Overview
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Editor's Overview

In 2004, in response to the prolific scholarship on the Civil War, distinguished historian Drew Gilpin Faust published "'We Should Grow Too Fond of It': Why We Love the Civil War," in this journal. It immediately became canonical. Twenty years later, as editor, I wanted to know if we still love the Civil War. It remains a core part of scholarship, teaching, and reading for so many of us. but has the Civil War lost some of its appeal? To answer this question, I organized a round-table with some of the world's leading thinkers about the Civil War. We were fortunate enough to get Drew Faust to join the conversation!

Also, in the issue are two terrific contributions to Civil War–era studies. The first, by Bennett Parten, brings to light the nearly twenty thousand formerly enslaved refugees who followed Gen. William T. Sherman's famous March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah. Building on the expanding raft of studies on emancipation, which he refers to as the "refugee turn," Parten challenges Willie Lee Rose's classic 1964 study Rehearsal for Reconstruction: The Port Royal Experiment, which shoehorns the Georgia refugees into the Port Royal experiment without realizing how their migration and displacement distinguished them from the freedpeople living on the Sea Islands. Pushing against the federal government's idea that the messiness of wartime emancipation could be easily rectified, Parten insists that the refugee framework better explains their status after slavery.

Also upending traditional interpretations of the Civil War era, Brent Campney exposes how white Northerners engaged in mob violence against white Southerners in Kansas, flipping the familiar script of white Southerners attacking white Northerners. Setting his attention "within Kansas onto the internecine struggle among white Kansans themselves," Campney covers a seven-year period "when white Northerners jockeyed for power with white Southerners amid rapidly and profoundly shifting state and national debates." By emphasizing newspaper accounts of the conflicts in Kansas, Campney reconstructs the violence that shaped Kansas's political history during the Civil War era and in so doing expands the temporal parameters of Bleeding Kansas.

The book review section, as always, delivers an exciting cast of reviews that would not be possible without Sarah Gardner's impeccable leadership and incisive editing. Brie Swenson Arnold reviews J. Matthew Gallman's much anticipated book on Democrats in the North during the Civil War, The Cacophony of [End Page 7] Politics: Northern Democrats and the American Civil War, and Jonathan S. Jones reviews Megan L. Bever's insightful study, At War with King Alcohol: Debating Drinking and Masculinity in the Civil War. The issue includes many other excellent reviews. Since becoming editor, I have had the great honor each year to publish eminent historian Nell Painter's artwork on the cover of the journal. For all 2024 issues, the cover, in Painter's words, will be "Arrived New Names 2, 2022, ink on paper 12 × 9, belonging to a suite of drawings inspired by William Still's Journal of interviews Still made with people self-emancipating from Southern enslavement. The original drawing, along with the lithographed William Still Triptych, is in the permanent collection of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania." [End Page 8]

Copyright © 2024 The Kent State University Press ...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1