{"title":"非自然主义、超验性挑战、高阶属性和绰号理论","authors":"Jussi Suikkanen","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonnaturalist realism is the view that normative properties are unique kind of stance-independent properties. It has been argued that such views fail to explain why two actions that are exactly alike otherwise must also have the same normative properties. Mark Schroeder and Knut Olav Skarsaune have recently suggested that nonnaturalist realists can respond to this supervenience challenge by taking the primary bearers of normative properties to be action kinds. This paper develops their response in two ways. First, it provides additional motivation for the previous claim about the bearers of normative properties by drawing from the work of H. A. Prichard. Second, and more importantly, it formulates a plausible metaphysical framework based on the contemporary trope theory to explain why action kinds would have their second-order properties, including their normative properties, necessarily.","PeriodicalId":508700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","volume":"26 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonnaturalism, the Supervenience Challenge, Higher-Order Properties, and Trope Theory\",\"authors\":\"Jussi Suikkanen\",\"doi\":\"10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonnaturalist realism is the view that normative properties are unique kind of stance-independent properties. It has been argued that such views fail to explain why two actions that are exactly alike otherwise must also have the same normative properties. Mark Schroeder and Knut Olav Skarsaune have recently suggested that nonnaturalist realists can respond to this supervenience challenge by taking the primary bearers of normative properties to be action kinds. This paper develops their response in two ways. First, it provides additional motivation for the previous claim about the bearers of normative properties by drawing from the work of H. A. Prichard. Second, and more importantly, it formulates a plausible metaphysical framework based on the contemporary trope theory to explain why action kinds would have their second-order properties, including their normative properties, necessarily.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v26i3.2103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
非自然主义现实主义认为,规范属性是一种独特的与立场无关的属性。有人认为,这种观点无法解释为什么两个在其他方面完全相同的行为也必须具有相同的规范属性。马克-施罗德(Mark Schroeder)和克努特-奥拉夫-斯卡尔绍纳(Knut Olav Skarsaune)最近提出,非自然主义现实主义者可以通过把规范属性的主要承载者视为行动种类来回应这种超验性挑战。本文从两个方面发展了他们的回应。首先,本文通过借鉴普里查德(H. A. Prichard)的研究成果,为前面关于规范属性的承担者的主张提供了额外的动机。其次,更重要的是,本文在当代特例理论的基础上提出了一个可信的形而上学框架,以解释为什么行动种类必然具有其二阶属性,包括其规范属性。
Nonnaturalism, the Supervenience Challenge, Higher-Order Properties, and Trope Theory
Nonnaturalist realism is the view that normative properties are unique kind of stance-independent properties. It has been argued that such views fail to explain why two actions that are exactly alike otherwise must also have the same normative properties. Mark Schroeder and Knut Olav Skarsaune have recently suggested that nonnaturalist realists can respond to this supervenience challenge by taking the primary bearers of normative properties to be action kinds. This paper develops their response in two ways. First, it provides additional motivation for the previous claim about the bearers of normative properties by drawing from the work of H. A. Prichard. Second, and more importantly, it formulates a plausible metaphysical framework based on the contemporary trope theory to explain why action kinds would have their second-order properties, including their normative properties, necessarily.