认真对待幼儿教育和幼儿的学习经历

Jennifer Keys Adair
{"title":"认真对待幼儿教育和幼儿的学习经历","authors":"Jennifer Keys Adair","doi":"10.1177/01614681241227734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, important early childhood scholars who critiqued normative ideas about early childhood frameworks, guidelines, and assessments have been silenced in highly ranked child development and early childhood journals. The qualitative methods needed to prioritize the perspectives of marginalized communities (i.e., ethnography, interview and focus groups, video-cued, narrative inquiry, testimonio, pláticas, counterstories, photovoice, and community mapping) routinely met (meet) resistance and rejection. Instead of continuing this rejective pattern, Teachers College Record has published provocative work that includes critical voices in early childhood education.","PeriodicalId":508365,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":"61 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Early Childhood Education and Young Children’s Learning Experiences Seriously\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Keys Adair\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01614681241227734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades, important early childhood scholars who critiqued normative ideas about early childhood frameworks, guidelines, and assessments have been silenced in highly ranked child development and early childhood journals. The qualitative methods needed to prioritize the perspectives of marginalized communities (i.e., ethnography, interview and focus groups, video-cued, narrative inquiry, testimonio, pláticas, counterstories, photovoice, and community mapping) routinely met (meet) resistance and rejection. Instead of continuing this rejective pattern, Teachers College Record has published provocative work that includes critical voices in early childhood education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education\",\"volume\":\"61 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241227734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241227734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,那些对幼儿教育框架、指南和评估的规范性观点提出批评的重要幼儿教育学者,在排名靠前的儿童发展和幼儿教育期刊上一直噤若寒蝉。优先考虑边缘化社区观点所需的定性方法(即人种学、访谈和焦点小组、视频录像、叙事调查、证词、pláticas、反故事、摄影舆论和社区地图)经常遇到(遇到)阻力和拒绝。师范学院记录》并没有继续这种排斥模式,而是出版了一些具有挑衅性的作品,其中包括幼儿教育中的批判性声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking Early Childhood Education and Young Children’s Learning Experiences Seriously
For decades, important early childhood scholars who critiqued normative ideas about early childhood frameworks, guidelines, and assessments have been silenced in highly ranked child development and early childhood journals. The qualitative methods needed to prioritize the perspectives of marginalized communities (i.e., ethnography, interview and focus groups, video-cued, narrative inquiry, testimonio, pláticas, counterstories, photovoice, and community mapping) routinely met (meet) resistance and rejection. Instead of continuing this rejective pattern, Teachers College Record has published provocative work that includes critical voices in early childhood education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Situated Partnership: Dynamics of Role Formation in a Research–Practice Partnership “A Wound That Was Already Festering”: The Burdens of a Racial Justice Program on Teachers of Color “It’s a Chance, Not a Choice”: Black Families, School Choice, and Gentrification in Washington, D.C. Colleague and Ally Pandemic Portals and Radical Imaginations: Employing Critical Arts-Based Pedagogies Toward Racial Justice with Secondary Preservice English Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1