Hannah M. Rivedal, Todd N. Temple, Robert J. Starchvick, Emily Braithwaite, Sarah R. Lowder, Seth J. Dorman, L. A. Núñez Rodríguez, A. Peetz, Inga A. Zasada
{"title":"俄勒冈种草中 Anguina 种瘿线虫分子鉴定和形态鉴定方法的比较","authors":"Hannah M. Rivedal, Todd N. Temple, Robert J. Starchvick, Emily Braithwaite, Sarah R. Lowder, Seth J. Dorman, L. A. Núñez Rodríguez, A. Peetz, Inga A. Zasada","doi":"10.1094/phytofr-01-24-0001-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oregon’s grass seed industry specializes in the production of forage grasses, including annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata). These species are hosts of seed gall nematodes (SGN): Anguina funesta and Anguina sp. SGN cause yield-limiting seed galls and can also vector toxic Rathayibacter bacteria. Trade partners have strict phytosanitary regulations leading to rejection of seed lots infested with SGN. Current best practices for SGN detection focus on post-harvest seed evaluation. Methods to evaluate fields before harvest could improve risk management decisions. In this study, we evaluated timing, collection, and detection methods to generate new recommendations for SGN detection throughout the growing season. Fields of annual ryegrass (21) and orchardgrass (7) were sampled in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at tillering (March), flowering (May), harvest (July), and germination (November). At each time point, tillers, seed heads or soil samples were collected. Nematodes were extracted from soil, tiller, and seed head samples using traditional nematology methods. Alternatively, SGN-specific real-time and conventional PCR protocols were evaluated on DNA extracted from tillers or seed heads. Direct enumeration of SGN from tillers with traditional nematology methods resulted in positive detections in 11-19% of fields depending on sample time and year as opposed to 33-44% of fields when using molecular methods. SGN were detected in 40% of fields using both methods when evaluating seed head samples. This study indicates the utility of incorporating molecular methods for risk evaluations of SGN and provides recommendations for the accurate detection of SGN throughout the growing season.","PeriodicalId":508090,"journal":{"name":"PhytoFrontiers™","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of molecular and morphological identification methods for Anguina seed gall nematodes in Oregon grasses grown for seed\",\"authors\":\"Hannah M. Rivedal, Todd N. Temple, Robert J. Starchvick, Emily Braithwaite, Sarah R. Lowder, Seth J. Dorman, L. A. Núñez Rodríguez, A. Peetz, Inga A. Zasada\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/phytofr-01-24-0001-r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oregon’s grass seed industry specializes in the production of forage grasses, including annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata). These species are hosts of seed gall nematodes (SGN): Anguina funesta and Anguina sp. SGN cause yield-limiting seed galls and can also vector toxic Rathayibacter bacteria. Trade partners have strict phytosanitary regulations leading to rejection of seed lots infested with SGN. Current best practices for SGN detection focus on post-harvest seed evaluation. Methods to evaluate fields before harvest could improve risk management decisions. In this study, we evaluated timing, collection, and detection methods to generate new recommendations for SGN detection throughout the growing season. Fields of annual ryegrass (21) and orchardgrass (7) were sampled in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at tillering (March), flowering (May), harvest (July), and germination (November). At each time point, tillers, seed heads or soil samples were collected. Nematodes were extracted from soil, tiller, and seed head samples using traditional nematology methods. Alternatively, SGN-specific real-time and conventional PCR protocols were evaluated on DNA extracted from tillers or seed heads. Direct enumeration of SGN from tillers with traditional nematology methods resulted in positive detections in 11-19% of fields depending on sample time and year as opposed to 33-44% of fields when using molecular methods. SGN were detected in 40% of fields using both methods when evaluating seed head samples. This study indicates the utility of incorporating molecular methods for risk evaluations of SGN and provides recommendations for the accurate detection of SGN throughout the growing season.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PhytoFrontiers™\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PhytoFrontiers™\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/phytofr-01-24-0001-r\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PhytoFrontiers™","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/phytofr-01-24-0001-r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of molecular and morphological identification methods for Anguina seed gall nematodes in Oregon grasses grown for seed
Oregon’s grass seed industry specializes in the production of forage grasses, including annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata). These species are hosts of seed gall nematodes (SGN): Anguina funesta and Anguina sp. SGN cause yield-limiting seed galls and can also vector toxic Rathayibacter bacteria. Trade partners have strict phytosanitary regulations leading to rejection of seed lots infested with SGN. Current best practices for SGN detection focus on post-harvest seed evaluation. Methods to evaluate fields before harvest could improve risk management decisions. In this study, we evaluated timing, collection, and detection methods to generate new recommendations for SGN detection throughout the growing season. Fields of annual ryegrass (21) and orchardgrass (7) were sampled in the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons at tillering (March), flowering (May), harvest (July), and germination (November). At each time point, tillers, seed heads or soil samples were collected. Nematodes were extracted from soil, tiller, and seed head samples using traditional nematology methods. Alternatively, SGN-specific real-time and conventional PCR protocols were evaluated on DNA extracted from tillers or seed heads. Direct enumeration of SGN from tillers with traditional nematology methods resulted in positive detections in 11-19% of fields depending on sample time and year as opposed to 33-44% of fields when using molecular methods. SGN were detected in 40% of fields using both methods when evaluating seed head samples. This study indicates the utility of incorporating molecular methods for risk evaluations of SGN and provides recommendations for the accurate detection of SGN throughout the growing season.