对不同文化和语言(CALD)人群康复过程问卷(QPR)的定性评估

R. Kakuma, Onah Uchenna Cajethan, F. Shawyer, Vrinda Edan, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered, Graham Meadows, Lisa Brophy
{"title":"对不同文化和语言(CALD)人群康复过程问卷(QPR)的定性评估","authors":"R. Kakuma, Onah Uchenna Cajethan, F. Shawyer, Vrinda Edan, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered, Graham Meadows, Lisa Brophy","doi":"10.1108/ijmhsc-05-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMental health recovery across cultures lacks understanding and suitable measures. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) is a self-report instrument measuring personal recovery outcomes for consumers of mental health services. However, the extent of its relevance among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities is unclear. This pilot study aimed to examine the relevance and utility of the QPR among CALD consumers of primary mental health services in Australia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEleven individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with two general practitioners (GPs) and nine consumers from two clinics, at locations with high Iranian and Burmese refugee or asylum seeker populations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach.\n\n\nFindings\nAlthough almost all consumers had little or no understanding of the concept of personal recovery, they found the QPR culturally acceptable and understandable. Using the QPR during mental health consultations can help with needs identification and goal setting. Challenges in using the QPR included completion time, cross-cultural differences in concepts and norms for some items, and need for careful translation. Consumers suggested additional items regarding family reputation, sexuality, and spirituality.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe QPR is potentially a valuable tool to support mental health consultations with CALD consumers, from the perspectives of both GPs and consumers.\n","PeriodicalId":503778,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR) in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations\",\"authors\":\"R. Kakuma, Onah Uchenna Cajethan, F. Shawyer, Vrinda Edan, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered, Graham Meadows, Lisa Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijmhsc-05-2023-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMental health recovery across cultures lacks understanding and suitable measures. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) is a self-report instrument measuring personal recovery outcomes for consumers of mental health services. However, the extent of its relevance among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities is unclear. This pilot study aimed to examine the relevance and utility of the QPR among CALD consumers of primary mental health services in Australia.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nEleven individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with two general practitioners (GPs) and nine consumers from two clinics, at locations with high Iranian and Burmese refugee or asylum seeker populations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nAlthough almost all consumers had little or no understanding of the concept of personal recovery, they found the QPR culturally acceptable and understandable. Using the QPR during mental health consultations can help with needs identification and goal setting. Challenges in using the QPR included completion time, cross-cultural differences in concepts and norms for some items, and need for careful translation. Consumers suggested additional items regarding family reputation, sexuality, and spirituality.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe QPR is potentially a valuable tool to support mental health consultations with CALD consumers, from the perspectives of both GPs and consumers.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-05-2023-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-05-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 不同文化背景下的心理健康康复缺乏理解和合适的测量方法。康复过程问卷 (QPR) 是一种自我报告工具,用于测量心理健康服务消费者的个人康复结果。然而,它在文化和语言多样化(CALD)社区中的适用程度尚不明确。设计/方法/途径在伊朗和缅甸难民或寻求庇护者较多的地区,对两名全科医生(GPs)和两家诊所的九名消费者进行了七次半结构化个人访谈。虽然几乎所有消费者都对个人康复的概念知之甚少或一无所知,但他们认为 QPR 在文化上是可以接受和理解的。在心理健康咨询过程中使用 QPR 可以帮助识别需求和设定目标。使用 QPR 所面临的挑战包括:完成时间、某些项目在概念和规范上的跨文化差异以及需要仔细 翻译。消费者建议增加有关家庭声誉、性和灵性的项目。原创性/价值从全科医生和消费者的角度来看,QPR 可能是支持与 CALD 消费者进行心理健康咨询的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A qualitative evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR) in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations
Purpose Mental health recovery across cultures lacks understanding and suitable measures. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) is a self-report instrument measuring personal recovery outcomes for consumers of mental health services. However, the extent of its relevance among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities is unclear. This pilot study aimed to examine the relevance and utility of the QPR among CALD consumers of primary mental health services in Australia. Design/methodology/approach Eleven individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with two general practitioners (GPs) and nine consumers from two clinics, at locations with high Iranian and Burmese refugee or asylum seeker populations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach. Findings Although almost all consumers had little or no understanding of the concept of personal recovery, they found the QPR culturally acceptable and understandable. Using the QPR during mental health consultations can help with needs identification and goal setting. Challenges in using the QPR included completion time, cross-cultural differences in concepts and norms for some items, and need for careful translation. Consumers suggested additional items regarding family reputation, sexuality, and spirituality. Originality/value The QPR is potentially a valuable tool to support mental health consultations with CALD consumers, from the perspectives of both GPs and consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiple and intersectional discrimination and mental health of migrant populations in Portugal after the COVID-19 pandemic Translation and validation of the Portuguese version of the discrimination in medical settings scale: a cross-sectional study with Portuguese Roma Rethinking resilience: a regression analysis study of the experiences of refugee and immigrant youth in Montreal I need you to survive: a qualitative exploration of family-based beliefs among resettled Congolese refugee women in the USA A typology of family caregiving for older immigrants: perspectives from care receivers and care providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1