高阶计算流体力学求解器的开发与验证

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4064620
William C. Tyson, Charles W. Jackson, Christopher J Roy
{"title":"高阶计算流体力学求解器的开发与验证","authors":"William C. Tyson, Charles W. Jackson, Christopher J Roy","doi":"10.1115/1.4064620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the past two decades, higher-order methods have gained much broader use in computational science and engineering as these schemes are often more efficient per degree-of-freedom at achieving a prescribed error tolerance than lower-order methods. During this time, higher-order variants of most discretization schemes, such as finite-difference methods, finite-volume methods, and finite-element methods, have emerged. The finite-volume method is arguably the most widely used discretization technique in production-level computational fluid dynamics solvers due to its robustness and conservation properties. However, most finite-volume solvers only employ a conventional second-order scheme. To leverage the benefits of higher-order methods, the higher-order finite-volume method seems the most natural for those seeking to extend their legacy solvers to higher-order. Nonetheless, ensuring higher-order accuracy is maintained is quite challenging as the implementation requirements for a higher-order scheme are much greater than that of a lower-order scheme. In this work, a methodology for verifying higher-order finite-volume codes is presented. The higher-order finite-volume method is outlined in detail. Order verification tests are proposed for all major components, including the treatment of curved boundaries and the higher-order solution reconstruction. System-level verification tests are performed using the weak form of the Method of Manufactured Solutions. Several canonical verification cases are also presented for the Euler and laminar Navier-Stokes equations.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Verification of a Higher-Order Computational Fluid Dynamics Solver\",\"authors\":\"William C. Tyson, Charles W. Jackson, Christopher J Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Over the past two decades, higher-order methods have gained much broader use in computational science and engineering as these schemes are often more efficient per degree-of-freedom at achieving a prescribed error tolerance than lower-order methods. During this time, higher-order variants of most discretization schemes, such as finite-difference methods, finite-volume methods, and finite-element methods, have emerged. The finite-volume method is arguably the most widely used discretization technique in production-level computational fluid dynamics solvers due to its robustness and conservation properties. However, most finite-volume solvers only employ a conventional second-order scheme. To leverage the benefits of higher-order methods, the higher-order finite-volume method seems the most natural for those seeking to extend their legacy solvers to higher-order. Nonetheless, ensuring higher-order accuracy is maintained is quite challenging as the implementation requirements for a higher-order scheme are much greater than that of a lower-order scheme. In this work, a methodology for verifying higher-order finite-volume codes is presented. The higher-order finite-volume method is outlined in detail. Order verification tests are proposed for all major components, including the treatment of curved boundaries and the higher-order solution reconstruction. System-level verification tests are performed using the weak form of the Method of Manufactured Solutions. Several canonical verification cases are also presented for the Euler and laminar Navier-Stokes equations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去二十年里,高阶方法在计算科学与工程领域得到了更广泛的应用,因为与低阶方法相比,高阶方法在实现规定误差容限方面的单位自由度效率更高。在此期间,出现了大多数离散化方案的高阶变体,如有限差分法、有限体积法和有限元法。有限体积法因其稳健性和守恒性,可以说是生产级计算流体力学求解器中使用最广泛的离散化技术。然而,大多数有限体积求解器仅采用传统的二阶方案。为了充分利用高阶方法的优势,高阶有限体积法似乎是那些寻求将传统求解器扩展到高阶求解器的人最自然的选择。然而,由于高阶方案的实施要求远高于低阶方案,因此确保保持高阶精度相当具有挑战性。本研究提出了一种验证高阶有限体积代码的方法。详细概述了高阶有限体积法。针对所有主要组件提出了阶次验证测试,包括曲线边界处理和高阶解重建。使用制造解法的弱形式进行了系统级验证测试。还介绍了欧拉方程和层流纳维-斯托克斯方程的几个典型验证案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Verification of a Higher-Order Computational Fluid Dynamics Solver
Over the past two decades, higher-order methods have gained much broader use in computational science and engineering as these schemes are often more efficient per degree-of-freedom at achieving a prescribed error tolerance than lower-order methods. During this time, higher-order variants of most discretization schemes, such as finite-difference methods, finite-volume methods, and finite-element methods, have emerged. The finite-volume method is arguably the most widely used discretization technique in production-level computational fluid dynamics solvers due to its robustness and conservation properties. However, most finite-volume solvers only employ a conventional second-order scheme. To leverage the benefits of higher-order methods, the higher-order finite-volume method seems the most natural for those seeking to extend their legacy solvers to higher-order. Nonetheless, ensuring higher-order accuracy is maintained is quite challenging as the implementation requirements for a higher-order scheme are much greater than that of a lower-order scheme. In this work, a methodology for verifying higher-order finite-volume codes is presented. The higher-order finite-volume method is outlined in detail. Order verification tests are proposed for all major components, including the treatment of curved boundaries and the higher-order solution reconstruction. System-level verification tests are performed using the weak form of the Method of Manufactured Solutions. Several canonical verification cases are also presented for the Euler and laminar Navier-Stokes equations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains A Framework for Developing Systematic Testbeds for Multi-Fidelity Optimization Techniques Reliability Analysis for RV Reducer by Combining PCE and Saddlepoint Approximation Considering Multi-Failure Modes Machine Learning-Based Resilience Modeling and Assessment of High Consequence Systems Under Uncertainty Posterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1