{"title":"非常规油井气举过程中的井底流动压力","authors":"Miao Jin, Hamid Emami‐Meybodi, Mohammad Ahmadi","doi":"10.2118/214832-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting the flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) of unconventional oil wells under gas lift operations. Well parameters, fluid properties, production/injection data, and bottomhole gauge pressures from 16 shale oil wells in Permian Basin, Texas, USA, are analyzed to determine key parameters affecting FBHP during the gas lift operation. For the reservoir fluid properties, several pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) models, such as Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR); Lee, Gonzalez, and Eakin; and Standing, among others, are examined against experimentally tuned fluid properties (i.e., viscosity, formation volume factor, and solution gas-oil ratio) to identify representative fluid (PVT) models for oil and gas properties. Pipe flow models (i.e., Hagedorn and Brown; Gray, Begs and Brill; and Petalas and Aziz) are also examined by comparing calculated FBHP against the bottomhole gauge pressures to identify a representative pipe flow model. Training and test data sets are then generated using the representative PVT and pipe flow models to develop a physics-based ANN model. The physics-based ANN model inputs are hydrocarbon fluid properties, liquid flow rate (qL), gas-liquid ratio (GLR), water-oil ratio (WOR), well true vertical depth (TVD), wellhead pressure (Pwh), wellhead temperature (Twh), and temperature gradient (dT/dh). A data-based ANN model is also developed based on only TVD, Pwh, qL, GLR, and WOR. Both physics- and data-based ANN models are trained through hyperparameter optimization using genetic algorithm and K-fold validation and then tested against the gauge FBHP. The results reveal that both models perform well with the FBHP prediction from field data with a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of around 10%. However, a comparison between results from the physics- and data-based ANN models shows that the accuracy of the physics-based model is higher at the later phase of the gas lift operation when the steady-state pipe flow is well established. On the contrary, the data-based model performs better for the early phase of gas lift operation when transient flow behavior is dominant. Developed ANN models and workflows can be applied to optimize gas lift operations under different fluid and well conditions.","PeriodicalId":510854,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flowing Bottomhole Pressure during Gas Lift in Unconventional Oil Wells\",\"authors\":\"Miao Jin, Hamid Emami‐Meybodi, Mohammad Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/214832-pa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting the flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) of unconventional oil wells under gas lift operations. Well parameters, fluid properties, production/injection data, and bottomhole gauge pressures from 16 shale oil wells in Permian Basin, Texas, USA, are analyzed to determine key parameters affecting FBHP during the gas lift operation. For the reservoir fluid properties, several pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) models, such as Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR); Lee, Gonzalez, and Eakin; and Standing, among others, are examined against experimentally tuned fluid properties (i.e., viscosity, formation volume factor, and solution gas-oil ratio) to identify representative fluid (PVT) models for oil and gas properties. Pipe flow models (i.e., Hagedorn and Brown; Gray, Begs and Brill; and Petalas and Aziz) are also examined by comparing calculated FBHP against the bottomhole gauge pressures to identify a representative pipe flow model. Training and test data sets are then generated using the representative PVT and pipe flow models to develop a physics-based ANN model. The physics-based ANN model inputs are hydrocarbon fluid properties, liquid flow rate (qL), gas-liquid ratio (GLR), water-oil ratio (WOR), well true vertical depth (TVD), wellhead pressure (Pwh), wellhead temperature (Twh), and temperature gradient (dT/dh). A data-based ANN model is also developed based on only TVD, Pwh, qL, GLR, and WOR. Both physics- and data-based ANN models are trained through hyperparameter optimization using genetic algorithm and K-fold validation and then tested against the gauge FBHP. The results reveal that both models perform well with the FBHP prediction from field data with a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of around 10%. However, a comparison between results from the physics- and data-based ANN models shows that the accuracy of the physics-based model is higher at the later phase of the gas lift operation when the steady-state pipe flow is well established. On the contrary, the data-based model performs better for the early phase of gas lift operation when transient flow behavior is dominant. Developed ANN models and workflows can be applied to optimize gas lift operations under different fluid and well conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/214832-pa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214832-pa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们提出了人工神经网络 (ANN) 模型,用于预测气举作业下非常规油井的流动井底压力 (FBHP)。我们分析了美国德克萨斯州二叠纪盆地 16 口页岩油井的油井参数、流体性质、生产/注入数据以及井底表压,以确定气举作业期间影响井底压力的关键参数。在储层流体属性方面,针对实验调整的流体属性(即粘度、地层体积因子和溶液气油比),研究了几种压力-体积-温度(PVT)模型,如 Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR)、Lee、Gonzalez 和 Eakin 以及 Standing 等,以确定油气属性的代表性流体(PVT)模型。还通过将计算的 FBHP 与井底表压进行比较来确定具有代表性的管流模型(即 Hagedorn 和 Brown;Gray、Begs 和 Brill;以及 Petalas 和 Aziz)。然后使用具有代表性的 PVT 和管流模型生成训练和测试数据集,以开发基于物理的 ANN 模型。基于物理的 ANN 模型输入包括碳氢化合物流体特性、液体流速 (qL)、气液比 (GLR)、水油比 (WOR)、油井实际垂直深度 (TVD)、井口压力 (Pwh)、井口温度 (Twh) 和温度梯度 (dT/dh)。此外,还开发了一个基于数据的 ANN 模型,该模型仅基于 TVD、Pwh、qL、GLR 和 WOR。使用遗传算法和 K-fold 验证,通过超参数优化对物理和数据 ANN 模型进行训练,然后根据仪器 FBHP 进行测试。结果表明,这两种模型都能很好地预测来自现场数据的 FBHP,归一化平均绝对误差 (NMAE) 约为 10%。然而,对基于物理的 ANN 模型和基于数据的 ANN 模型的结果进行比较后发现,基于物理的模型在气举运行的后期阶段,即稳态管道流量建立良好的阶段精度更高。相反,当瞬态流动行为占主导地位时,基于数据的模型在气举运行的早期阶段表现更好。开发的 ANN 模型和工作流程可用于优化不同流体和油井条件下的气举作业。
Flowing Bottomhole Pressure during Gas Lift in Unconventional Oil Wells
We present artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting the flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) of unconventional oil wells under gas lift operations. Well parameters, fluid properties, production/injection data, and bottomhole gauge pressures from 16 shale oil wells in Permian Basin, Texas, USA, are analyzed to determine key parameters affecting FBHP during the gas lift operation. For the reservoir fluid properties, several pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) models, such as Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR); Lee, Gonzalez, and Eakin; and Standing, among others, are examined against experimentally tuned fluid properties (i.e., viscosity, formation volume factor, and solution gas-oil ratio) to identify representative fluid (PVT) models for oil and gas properties. Pipe flow models (i.e., Hagedorn and Brown; Gray, Begs and Brill; and Petalas and Aziz) are also examined by comparing calculated FBHP against the bottomhole gauge pressures to identify a representative pipe flow model. Training and test data sets are then generated using the representative PVT and pipe flow models to develop a physics-based ANN model. The physics-based ANN model inputs are hydrocarbon fluid properties, liquid flow rate (qL), gas-liquid ratio (GLR), water-oil ratio (WOR), well true vertical depth (TVD), wellhead pressure (Pwh), wellhead temperature (Twh), and temperature gradient (dT/dh). A data-based ANN model is also developed based on only TVD, Pwh, qL, GLR, and WOR. Both physics- and data-based ANN models are trained through hyperparameter optimization using genetic algorithm and K-fold validation and then tested against the gauge FBHP. The results reveal that both models perform well with the FBHP prediction from field data with a normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) of around 10%. However, a comparison between results from the physics- and data-based ANN models shows that the accuracy of the physics-based model is higher at the later phase of the gas lift operation when the steady-state pipe flow is well established. On the contrary, the data-based model performs better for the early phase of gas lift operation when transient flow behavior is dominant. Developed ANN models and workflows can be applied to optimize gas lift operations under different fluid and well conditions.