针对痴呆症患者挑战行为的非药物处方:对 12 个月结果数据的评估

Hester Bowers, Megan Holden, Joanna Marshall
{"title":"针对痴呆症患者挑战行为的非药物处方:对 12 个月结果数据的评估","authors":"Hester Bowers, Megan Holden, Joanna Marshall","doi":"10.53841/bpsfpop.2024.1.165.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as a first line treatment for the management of Behaviour that Challenges in Dementia (BtC). For the past decade, The Durham and Darlington Care Home Liaison (CHL) Hub have developed Behaviour Support Plans (BSPs), providing guidance on staff approaches and recommending specific, individualised, non-pharmacological interventions. Until recently, it was left to residents’ families to pay for and provide any items recommended. Clinicians knew what interventions could help, but they could not prescribe them. The CHL Hub was awarded non-recurrent funding in 2021 to prescribe a range of non-pharmacological interventions. This evaluation presents 12 months of routine outcome data for residents receiving such interventions.Proxy-rated measures of behaviour that challenges (Challenging Behaviour Scale, CBS, Moniz-Cook et al., 2001) and Quality of Life in Dementia Scale (QUALID, Weiner et al., 2000) were completed as part of routine care pre and post non-pharmacological intervention. Qualitative feedback .from care home staff and families of residents receiving non-pharmacological interventions was collected via telephone interview.Results show a significant difference between pre and post intervention CBS (z=1.28, p<.01) and QUALID scores (z=1.03, p<.01), with large effect sizes (r=.82, CI [.74-.87] and r=.67, CI [.5-.81], respectively).Care home residents showed reduced BtC and improved quality of life following the introduction of non-pharmacological interventions as part of BSPs. Recommendations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":306496,"journal":{"name":"FPOP Bulletin: Psychology of Older People","volume":"330 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-pharmacological prescribing for behaviour that challenges in dementia: An evaluation of 12 months of outcome data\",\"authors\":\"Hester Bowers, Megan Holden, Joanna Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpsfpop.2024.1.165.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as a first line treatment for the management of Behaviour that Challenges in Dementia (BtC). For the past decade, The Durham and Darlington Care Home Liaison (CHL) Hub have developed Behaviour Support Plans (BSPs), providing guidance on staff approaches and recommending specific, individualised, non-pharmacological interventions. Until recently, it was left to residents’ families to pay for and provide any items recommended. Clinicians knew what interventions could help, but they could not prescribe them. The CHL Hub was awarded non-recurrent funding in 2021 to prescribe a range of non-pharmacological interventions. This evaluation presents 12 months of routine outcome data for residents receiving such interventions.Proxy-rated measures of behaviour that challenges (Challenging Behaviour Scale, CBS, Moniz-Cook et al., 2001) and Quality of Life in Dementia Scale (QUALID, Weiner et al., 2000) were completed as part of routine care pre and post non-pharmacological intervention. Qualitative feedback .from care home staff and families of residents receiving non-pharmacological interventions was collected via telephone interview.Results show a significant difference between pre and post intervention CBS (z=1.28, p<.01) and QUALID scores (z=1.03, p<.01), with large effect sizes (r=.82, CI [.74-.87] and r=.67, CI [.5-.81], respectively).Care home residents showed reduced BtC and improved quality of life following the introduction of non-pharmacological interventions as part of BSPs. Recommendations are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FPOP Bulletin: Psychology of Older People\",\"volume\":\"330 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FPOP Bulletin: Psychology of Older People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpop.2024.1.165.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FPOP Bulletin: Psychology of Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfpop.2024.1.165.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议将非药物干预作为管理痴呆症挑战行为 (BtC) 的一线治疗方法。在过去十年中,达勒姆和达林顿护理之家联络中心(CHL)制定了行为支持计划(BSP),为工作人员的方法提供指导,并推荐具体的、个性化的非药物干预措施。直到最近,居民家庭仍需支付和提供所建议的任何项目。临床医生知道哪些干预措施可以起到帮助作用,但他们无法开出处方。CHL 中心在 2021 年获得了非经常性资助,可以处方一系列非药物干预措施。作为非药物干预前和干预后常规护理的一部分,我们完成了对挑战行为(挑战行为量表,CBS,Moniz-Cook 等人,2001 年)和痴呆症生活质量量表(QUALID,Weiner 等人,2000 年)的代理评级测量。结果显示,干预前后的 CBS(z=1.28,p<.01)和 QUALID 评分(z=1.03,p<.01)存在显著差异。结果表明,干预前后的 CBS(z=1.28,p<.01)和 QUALID 评分(z=1.03,p<.01)有明显差异,且效应大小较大(分别为 r=.82,CI [.74-.87]和 r=.67,CI [.5-.81])。本文讨论了相关建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-pharmacological prescribing for behaviour that challenges in dementia: An evaluation of 12 months of outcome data
Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as a first line treatment for the management of Behaviour that Challenges in Dementia (BtC). For the past decade, The Durham and Darlington Care Home Liaison (CHL) Hub have developed Behaviour Support Plans (BSPs), providing guidance on staff approaches and recommending specific, individualised, non-pharmacological interventions. Until recently, it was left to residents’ families to pay for and provide any items recommended. Clinicians knew what interventions could help, but they could not prescribe them. The CHL Hub was awarded non-recurrent funding in 2021 to prescribe a range of non-pharmacological interventions. This evaluation presents 12 months of routine outcome data for residents receiving such interventions.Proxy-rated measures of behaviour that challenges (Challenging Behaviour Scale, CBS, Moniz-Cook et al., 2001) and Quality of Life in Dementia Scale (QUALID, Weiner et al., 2000) were completed as part of routine care pre and post non-pharmacological intervention. Qualitative feedback .from care home staff and families of residents receiving non-pharmacological interventions was collected via telephone interview.Results show a significant difference between pre and post intervention CBS (z=1.28, p<.01) and QUALID scores (z=1.03, p<.01), with large effect sizes (r=.82, CI [.74-.87] and r=.67, CI [.5-.81], respectively).Care home residents showed reduced BtC and improved quality of life following the introduction of non-pharmacological interventions as part of BSPs. Recommendations are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Widening access to older people’s clinical psychology: Piloting a summer shadowing programme in older adults services An evaluation of the process of measuring outcomes of a cognitive stimulation therapy group Exploring clinicians’ experience of using Behavioural Family Therapy within an older adult community mental health service Talking sh**! – are we doing enough? Reflections of an APPly programme assistant psychologist: 6-month post in an acute older adults’ ward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1