{"title":"寻求机会。应用民族学分析","authors":"Áine McAllister","doi":"10.1075/lcs.00042.mca","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper discusses a poetic output of a research project at the intersection of linguistic ethnography (LE) and\n poetic inquiry (PI) which explores the barriers experienced by refugee and asylum seekers, seeking access to Higher Education. The\n research draws on Jan Blommaert’s applied ethnopoetics (AEP) work to reconstruct silenced voices (Blommaert, 2006). AEP as a ‘means of recognition’ of marginalised voices is explored. The paper goes on\n to explore the transformative possibilities for knowledge production offered by combining AEP with PI. This innovative approach\n and output are presented as act of resistance to normative expectations within academia which freeze conditions for voice (Blommaert, 2008). Questions are then offered to consider how we might advance the\n approach and its emancipatory potential further.","PeriodicalId":252896,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Society","volume":"226 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking access. Applied ethnopoetic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Áine McAllister\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lcs.00042.mca\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper discusses a poetic output of a research project at the intersection of linguistic ethnography (LE) and\\n poetic inquiry (PI) which explores the barriers experienced by refugee and asylum seekers, seeking access to Higher Education. The\\n research draws on Jan Blommaert’s applied ethnopoetics (AEP) work to reconstruct silenced voices (Blommaert, 2006). AEP as a ‘means of recognition’ of marginalised voices is explored. The paper goes on\\n to explore the transformative possibilities for knowledge production offered by combining AEP with PI. This innovative approach\\n and output are presented as act of resistance to normative expectations within academia which freeze conditions for voice (Blommaert, 2008). Questions are then offered to consider how we might advance the\\n approach and its emancipatory potential further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00042.mca\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00042.mca","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文讨论了语言民族志(LE)与诗歌探究(PI)交叉研究项目的诗歌成果,该项目探讨了难民和寻求庇护者在寻求接受高等教育时遇到的障碍。这项研究借鉴了 Jan Blommaert 的应用民族志(AEP)工作,以重建沉默的声音(Blommaert,2006 年)。本文探讨了应用民族志作为 "承认 "边缘化声音的一种 "手段"。本文接着探讨了将 AEP 与 PI 结合起来为知识生产提供的变革可能性。这种创新方法和成果被视为对学术界规范性期望的抵制行为,而学术界的规范性期望冻结了发表意见的条件(Blommaert,2008 年)。然后提出了一些问题,以考虑我们如何进一步推进这种方法及其解放潜力。
This paper discusses a poetic output of a research project at the intersection of linguistic ethnography (LE) and
poetic inquiry (PI) which explores the barriers experienced by refugee and asylum seekers, seeking access to Higher Education. The
research draws on Jan Blommaert’s applied ethnopoetics (AEP) work to reconstruct silenced voices (Blommaert, 2006). AEP as a ‘means of recognition’ of marginalised voices is explored. The paper goes on
to explore the transformative possibilities for knowledge production offered by combining AEP with PI. This innovative approach
and output are presented as act of resistance to normative expectations within academia which freeze conditions for voice (Blommaert, 2008). Questions are then offered to consider how we might advance the
approach and its emancipatory potential further.