D. Feshchenko, K. A. Kaperiz, B. A. Rudenko, F. B. Shukurov, D. Vasiliev, K. Davtyan, A. Tarasov, Е. A. Trufanova, M. T. Taliouridze
{"title":"起搏器植入术后导联相关上腔静脉综合征的血管内治疗","authors":"D. Feshchenko, K. A. Kaperiz, B. A. Rudenko, F. B. Shukurov, D. Vasiliev, K. Davtyan, A. Tarasov, Е. A. Trufanova, M. T. Taliouridze","doi":"10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is due to impaired venous outflow from the head, neck, limbs and upper half of the body into the right atrium due to stenosis or complete obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC). Increased venous pressure in the SVC and lack of timely treatment leads not only to serious complications, but also to death. In recent years, the etiology of SVCS has changed dramatically, mainly due to an increase in the number of implanted intravascular devices (central venous catheters, pacemakers, defibrillators, and other devices). Endovascular methods have become widely used in the treatment of patients with SVCS. This was primarily due to the minimally invasive nature of the intervention, the high technical success of the operation and the rapid onset of clinical improvement. Patients who develop SVCS after device implantation are predominantly younger and have a longer life expectancy. When choosing a treatment method, it is extremely important to take these factors into account and give preference to methods providing a long-term effect with the fewest possible complications. The article presents a case of endovascular treatment of a patient with SVCS occlusion, which developed 9 years after pacemaker implantation, using intravascular imaging methods.","PeriodicalId":9545,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular treatment of lead-related superior vena cava syndrome after pacemaker implantation\",\"authors\":\"D. Feshchenko, K. A. Kaperiz, B. A. Rudenko, F. B. Shukurov, D. Vasiliev, K. Davtyan, A. Tarasov, Е. A. Trufanova, M. T. Taliouridze\",\"doi\":\"10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is due to impaired venous outflow from the head, neck, limbs and upper half of the body into the right atrium due to stenosis or complete obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC). Increased venous pressure in the SVC and lack of timely treatment leads not only to serious complications, but also to death. In recent years, the etiology of SVCS has changed dramatically, mainly due to an increase in the number of implanted intravascular devices (central venous catheters, pacemakers, defibrillators, and other devices). Endovascular methods have become widely used in the treatment of patients with SVCS. This was primarily due to the minimally invasive nature of the intervention, the high technical success of the operation and the rapid onset of clinical improvement. Patients who develop SVCS after device implantation are predominantly younger and have a longer life expectancy. When choosing a treatment method, it is extremely important to take these factors into account and give preference to methods providing a long-term effect with the fewest possible complications. The article presents a case of endovascular treatment of a patient with SVCS occlusion, which developed 9 years after pacemaker implantation, using intravascular imaging methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2023-3850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Endovascular treatment of lead-related superior vena cava syndrome after pacemaker implantation
Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is due to impaired venous outflow from the head, neck, limbs and upper half of the body into the right atrium due to stenosis or complete obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC). Increased venous pressure in the SVC and lack of timely treatment leads not only to serious complications, but also to death. In recent years, the etiology of SVCS has changed dramatically, mainly due to an increase in the number of implanted intravascular devices (central venous catheters, pacemakers, defibrillators, and other devices). Endovascular methods have become widely used in the treatment of patients with SVCS. This was primarily due to the minimally invasive nature of the intervention, the high technical success of the operation and the rapid onset of clinical improvement. Patients who develop SVCS after device implantation are predominantly younger and have a longer life expectancy. When choosing a treatment method, it is extremely important to take these factors into account and give preference to methods providing a long-term effect with the fewest possible complications. The article presents a case of endovascular treatment of a patient with SVCS occlusion, which developed 9 years after pacemaker implantation, using intravascular imaging methods.
期刊介绍:
The most important objectives of the journal are: the generalization of scientific and practical achievements in the field of cardiology, increasing scientific and practical skills of cardiologists.
The scientific concept of publication does the publication of modern achievements in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the results of research, national and international clinical trials.
For publication in the journal are invited both domestic and foreign scientists and clinicians working in the field of cardiology, as well as doctors of other specialties.
The magazine covers various issues in cardiology and related specialties. Each issue is prepared by Executive editor of the issue, a respected specialist in the field of epidemiology, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
The main focus of the publication — scientific articles on original research, the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disease, new diagnostic methods.
All members of the group of authors should meet all four criteria of authorship set forth in the ICMJE recommendations: 1) concept and design development or data analysis and interpretation, and 2) manuscript justification or verification of critical intellectual content, and 3) final approval for publication of the manuscript, and 4) consent to be responsible for all aspects of the work, and assume that issues relating to the thoroughness and diligent execution of any part of the study submitted are duly investigated and resolved.
Great importance the editors attached to the preparation of scientific papers by groups of authors at a high level, literacy, authors, and their ownership information, availability of research results not only to colleagues in Russia, but also abroad.