前瞻性观察研究:绝经后骨质疏松症患者在使用地诺单抗的同时使用 Romosozumab

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016
G. Adami, Elisa Pedrollo, Maurizio Rossini, A. Fassio, V. Braga, Emma Pasetto, Francesco Pollastri, C. Benini, O. Viapiana, Davide Gatti
{"title":"前瞻性观察研究:绝经后骨质疏松症患者在使用地诺单抗的同时使用 Romosozumab","authors":"G. Adami, Elisa Pedrollo, Maurizio Rossini, A. Fassio, V. Braga, Emma Pasetto, Francesco Pollastri, C. Benini, O. Viapiana, Davide Gatti","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Optimization of sequential and combination treatment is crucial in shaping long-term management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).\n \n \n \n We conducted a 6-month prospective observational study on postmenopausal women with severe OP receiving treatment with romosozumab either alone (in patients naïve to treatment) or in combination with ongoing long-term denosumab (>2 years) or continuing ongoing denosumab alone (>2 years). We collected serum samples for bone turnover markers, bone modulators and calcium phosphate metabolism at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Bone mineral density was assessed at baseline and after 6 months.\n \n \n \n Fifty-two postmenopausal women with OP were included in the study. Nineteen received romosozumab alone, 11 received romosozumab combined to ongoing denosumab and 22 continued denosumab alone. BMD increased significantly at all sites at 6 months of follow-up in the romosozumab alone group (femoral neck +8.1%, total hip +6.8% and lumbar spine +7.9%). In contrast, BMD increased significantly only at lumbar spine in the combination group (+7.2%) and in the denosumab group (+1.5%). P1nP increased significantly in romosozumab groups at month 3 (+70.4% in romosozumab alone group and + 99.1% in combination group). Sclerostin levels increased steeply in both romosozumab groups and Dkk1 did not change.\n \n \n \n Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab resulted in an increase in P1nP and lumbar spine BMD, but not in femoral neck BMD. For patients on denosumab, using romosozumab as an additional treatment appeared to be useful in terms of bone formation markers and spine BMD versus denosumab alone. Further randomized controlled trials, possibly powered to fracture outcomes, are needed to confirm our results.\n","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis, a prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"G. Adami, Elisa Pedrollo, Maurizio Rossini, A. Fassio, V. Braga, Emma Pasetto, Francesco Pollastri, C. Benini, O. Viapiana, Davide Gatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Optimization of sequential and combination treatment is crucial in shaping long-term management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a 6-month prospective observational study on postmenopausal women with severe OP receiving treatment with romosozumab either alone (in patients naïve to treatment) or in combination with ongoing long-term denosumab (>2 years) or continuing ongoing denosumab alone (>2 years). We collected serum samples for bone turnover markers, bone modulators and calcium phosphate metabolism at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Bone mineral density was assessed at baseline and after 6 months.\\n \\n \\n \\n Fifty-two postmenopausal women with OP were included in the study. Nineteen received romosozumab alone, 11 received romosozumab combined to ongoing denosumab and 22 continued denosumab alone. BMD increased significantly at all sites at 6 months of follow-up in the romosozumab alone group (femoral neck +8.1%, total hip +6.8% and lumbar spine +7.9%). In contrast, BMD increased significantly only at lumbar spine in the combination group (+7.2%) and in the denosumab group (+1.5%). P1nP increased significantly in romosozumab groups at month 3 (+70.4% in romosozumab alone group and + 99.1% in combination group). Sclerostin levels increased steeply in both romosozumab groups and Dkk1 did not change.\\n \\n \\n \\n Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab resulted in an increase in P1nP and lumbar spine BMD, but not in femoral neck BMD. For patients on denosumab, using romosozumab as an additional treatment appeared to be useful in terms of bone formation markers and spine BMD versus denosumab alone. Further randomized controlled trials, possibly powered to fracture outcomes, are needed to confirm our results.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化序贯治疗和联合治疗对于绝经后骨质疏松症(OP)的长期治疗至关重要。 我们对患有严重 OP 的绝经后妇女进行了一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性观察研究,研究对象是单独接受罗莫索单抗治疗(对初次接受治疗的患者)或与正在进行的长期地诺单抗联合治疗(>2 年)或继续单独接受地诺单抗治疗(>2 年)的患者。我们在基线期、第 3 个月和第 6 个月采集了骨转换标志物、骨调节剂和磷酸钙代谢的血清样本,并在基线期和 6 个月后评估了骨矿物质密度。 52名患有OP的绝经后妇女参与了研究。其中 19 人单独接受了罗莫索单抗治疗,11 人在接受罗莫索单抗治疗的同时继续接受地诺单抗治疗,22 人继续单独接受地诺单抗治疗。在 6 个月的随访中,单用罗莫索单抗组所有部位的 BMD 均有明显增加(股骨颈 +8.1%、全髋 +6.8%、腰椎 +7.9%)。相比之下,联合用药组(+7.2%)和地诺单抗组(+1.5%)只有腰椎的 BMD 有明显增加。在第 3 个月时,罗莫索单抗组的 P1nP 显著增加(罗莫索单抗单药组增加 70.4%,联合用药组增加 99.1%)。罗莫索单抗两组的硬骨蛋白水平均急剧上升,而Dkk1则没有变化。 在持续使用地诺单抗的基础上加用 Romosozumab,可增加 P1nP 和腰椎 BMD,但不能增加股骨颈 BMD。对于使用地诺单抗的患者来说,与单独使用地诺单抗相比,使用 Romosozumab 作为额外治疗似乎对骨形成标志物和脊柱 BMD 有帮助。要证实我们的研究结果,还需要进一步的随机对照试验(可能针对骨折结果)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis, a prospective observational study
Optimization of sequential and combination treatment is crucial in shaping long-term management of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP). We conducted a 6-month prospective observational study on postmenopausal women with severe OP receiving treatment with romosozumab either alone (in patients naïve to treatment) or in combination with ongoing long-term denosumab (>2 years) or continuing ongoing denosumab alone (>2 years). We collected serum samples for bone turnover markers, bone modulators and calcium phosphate metabolism at baseline, month 3 and month 6. Bone mineral density was assessed at baseline and after 6 months. Fifty-two postmenopausal women with OP were included in the study. Nineteen received romosozumab alone, 11 received romosozumab combined to ongoing denosumab and 22 continued denosumab alone. BMD increased significantly at all sites at 6 months of follow-up in the romosozumab alone group (femoral neck +8.1%, total hip +6.8% and lumbar spine +7.9%). In contrast, BMD increased significantly only at lumbar spine in the combination group (+7.2%) and in the denosumab group (+1.5%). P1nP increased significantly in romosozumab groups at month 3 (+70.4% in romosozumab alone group and + 99.1% in combination group). Sclerostin levels increased steeply in both romosozumab groups and Dkk1 did not change. Romosozumab added to ongoing denosumab resulted in an increase in P1nP and lumbar spine BMD, but not in femoral neck BMD. For patients on denosumab, using romosozumab as an additional treatment appeared to be useful in terms of bone formation markers and spine BMD versus denosumab alone. Further randomized controlled trials, possibly powered to fracture outcomes, are needed to confirm our results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the relationship between glycemic control and bone fragility within the UK Biobank: observational and one-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. Correction to: Prevalence and risk factors for atypical femoral fracture among Lebanese patients with hip and shaft fractures. In nondiabetic C57BL/6J mice, canagliflozin affects the skeleton in a sex- and age-dependent manner. Genotype-phenotype correlations in 294 pediatric patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Prevalence of chondrocalcinosis and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease in a cohort of adult patients with low alkaline phosphatase levels and a positive versus negative genetic ALPL study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1