应计制异常现象消失后分析师与应计制相关的预测乐观程度的变化

Sami Keskek, Senyo Tse
{"title":"应计制异常现象消失后分析师与应计制相关的预测乐观程度的变化","authors":"Sami Keskek, Senyo Tse","doi":"10.2308/jfr-2022-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We investigate changes in analysts’ accrual-related forecast optimism after the disappearance of the accrual anomaly. We find that such optimism persists in the no-anomaly period, particularly when analysts’ incentives are aligned with greater optimism (i.e., for firms with high external financing). By contrast, the accrual-related forecast optimism declines when analysts’ incentives for optimism are low and in circumstances where analysts would have been more aware of accruals information after the anomaly became publicized (i.e., when analysts issued a cash flow forecast). These findings suggest that analysts’ incentives can offset forecast improvements that their heightened accrual awareness would otherwise allow. They also highlight the importance of considering both analysts’ incentives and knowledge when interpreting their forecasts.\n Data Availability: Data are available from sources identified in the text.\n JEL Classifications: G14; G29; M41.","PeriodicalId":506454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting","volume":"19 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Analysts’ Accrual-Related Forecast Optimism after the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly\",\"authors\":\"Sami Keskek, Senyo Tse\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfr-2022-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We investigate changes in analysts’ accrual-related forecast optimism after the disappearance of the accrual anomaly. We find that such optimism persists in the no-anomaly period, particularly when analysts’ incentives are aligned with greater optimism (i.e., for firms with high external financing). By contrast, the accrual-related forecast optimism declines when analysts’ incentives for optimism are low and in circumstances where analysts would have been more aware of accruals information after the anomaly became publicized (i.e., when analysts issued a cash flow forecast). These findings suggest that analysts’ incentives can offset forecast improvements that their heightened accrual awareness would otherwise allow. They also highlight the importance of considering both analysts’ incentives and knowledge when interpreting their forecasts.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from sources identified in the text.\\n JEL Classifications: G14; G29; M41.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting\",\"volume\":\"19 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfr-2022-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfr-2022-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了应计制异常消失后分析师与应计制相关的乐观预测的变化。我们发现,这种乐观情绪在无异常期间持续存在,尤其是当分析师的动机与更大的乐观情绪相一致时(即外部融资较多的公司)。相比之下,当分析师的乐观动机较低时,以及在异常情况公开后分析师会更多地了解应计制信息的情况下(即分析师发布现金流预测时),应计制相关预测的乐观程度会下降。这些研究结果表明,分析师的动机可能会抵消他们对应计项目的进一步了解所带来的预测改进。这些发现还强调了在解释分析师的预测时同时考虑其动机和知识的重要性。数据可用性:数据可从文中确定的来源获得。JEL 分类:G14;G29;M41。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in Analysts’ Accrual-Related Forecast Optimism after the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly
We investigate changes in analysts’ accrual-related forecast optimism after the disappearance of the accrual anomaly. We find that such optimism persists in the no-anomaly period, particularly when analysts’ incentives are aligned with greater optimism (i.e., for firms with high external financing). By contrast, the accrual-related forecast optimism declines when analysts’ incentives for optimism are low and in circumstances where analysts would have been more aware of accruals information after the anomaly became publicized (i.e., when analysts issued a cash flow forecast). These findings suggest that analysts’ incentives can offset forecast improvements that their heightened accrual awareness would otherwise allow. They also highlight the importance of considering both analysts’ incentives and knowledge when interpreting their forecasts. Data Availability: Data are available from sources identified in the text. JEL Classifications: G14; G29; M41.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Exposure Draft “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)” The Credit Rating Agency Market in Africa: Landscape and Future Research Directions Investment Professionals’ Preferences Regarding Income Statement Presentation Changes in Analysts’ Accrual-Related Forecast Optimism after the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly Changes in Analysts’ Accrual-Related Forecast Optimism after the Disappearance of the Accrual Anomaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1