以大脑自动调节为导向的最佳血压管理降低了脓毒性休克患者出现谵妄的风险

Qianyi Peng , Xia Liu , Meilin Ai , Li Huang , Li Li , Wei Liu , Chunguang Zhao , Chenghuan Hu , Lina Zhang
{"title":"以大脑自动调节为导向的最佳血压管理降低了脓毒性休克患者出现谵妄的风险","authors":"Qianyi Peng ,&nbsp;Xia Liu ,&nbsp;Meilin Ai ,&nbsp;Li Huang ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Chunguang Zhao ,&nbsp;Chenghuan Hu ,&nbsp;Lina Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When resuscitating patients with septic shock, cerebrovascular reactivity parameters are calculated by monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) using near-infrared spectroscopy to determine the optimal blood pressure. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management on the incidence of delirium and the prognosis of patients with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China. Fifty-one patients with septic shock (December 2020–May 2022) were enrolled and randomly allocated to the experimental (<em>n</em>=26) or control group (<em>n</em>=25). Using the ICM<sup>+</sup> software, we monitored the dynamic changes in rSO<sub>2</sub> and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and calculated the cerebrovascular reactivity parameter tissue oxygen reactivity index to determine the optimal blood pressure to maintain normal cerebral autoregulation function during resuscitation in the experimental group. The control group was treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Differences in the incidence of delirium and 28-day mortality between the two groups were compared, and the risk factors were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 51 patients, including 39 male and 12 female, had a mean age of (57.0±14.9) years. The incidence of delirium was 40.1% (23/51), and the 28-day mortality rate was 29.4% (15/51). The mean MAP during the first 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was higher ([84.5±12.2] mmHg <em>vs.</em> [77.4±11.8] mmHg, <em>P</em>=0.040), and the incidence of delirium was lower (30.8% <em>vs.</em> 60.0%, <em>P</em>=0.036) in the experimental group than in the control group. The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]=0.090, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.009 to 0.923, <em>P</em>=0.043) and length of ICU stay (OR=1.473, 95% CI: 1.093 to 1.985, <em>P</em>=0.011) were risk factors for delirium during septic shock. Vasoactive drug dose (OR=8.445, 95% CI: 1.26 to 56.576, <em>P</em>=0.028) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>) (OR=0.958, 95% CI: 0.921 to 0.996, <em>P</em>=0.032) were the risk factors for 28-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management during shock resuscitation reduces the incidence of delirium in patients with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Trial Registration</strong></h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov ldentifer: NCT03879317</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 376-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24000033/pdfft?md5=36e2277329e7a6cc912306adadac723d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667100X24000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management reduced the risk of delirium in patients with septic shock\",\"authors\":\"Qianyi Peng ,&nbsp;Xia Liu ,&nbsp;Meilin Ai ,&nbsp;Li Huang ,&nbsp;Li Li ,&nbsp;Wei Liu ,&nbsp;Chunguang Zhao ,&nbsp;Chenghuan Hu ,&nbsp;Lina Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When resuscitating patients with septic shock, cerebrovascular reactivity parameters are calculated by monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) using near-infrared spectroscopy to determine the optimal blood pressure. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management on the incidence of delirium and the prognosis of patients with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China. Fifty-one patients with septic shock (December 2020–May 2022) were enrolled and randomly allocated to the experimental (<em>n</em>=26) or control group (<em>n</em>=25). Using the ICM<sup>+</sup> software, we monitored the dynamic changes in rSO<sub>2</sub> and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and calculated the cerebrovascular reactivity parameter tissue oxygen reactivity index to determine the optimal blood pressure to maintain normal cerebral autoregulation function during resuscitation in the experimental group. The control group was treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Differences in the incidence of delirium and 28-day mortality between the two groups were compared, and the risk factors were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 51 patients, including 39 male and 12 female, had a mean age of (57.0±14.9) years. The incidence of delirium was 40.1% (23/51), and the 28-day mortality rate was 29.4% (15/51). The mean MAP during the first 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was higher ([84.5±12.2] mmHg <em>vs.</em> [77.4±11.8] mmHg, <em>P</em>=0.040), and the incidence of delirium was lower (30.8% <em>vs.</em> 60.0%, <em>P</em>=0.036) in the experimental group than in the control group. The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]=0.090, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.009 to 0.923, <em>P</em>=0.043) and length of ICU stay (OR=1.473, 95% CI: 1.093 to 1.985, <em>P</em>=0.011) were risk factors for delirium during septic shock. Vasoactive drug dose (OR=8.445, 95% CI: 1.26 to 56.576, <em>P</em>=0.028) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>) (OR=0.958, 95% CI: 0.921 to 0.996, <em>P</em>=0.032) were the risk factors for 28-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management during shock resuscitation reduces the incidence of delirium in patients with septic shock.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Trial Registration</strong></h3><p>ClinicalTrials.gov ldentifer: NCT03879317</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 376-383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24000033/pdfft?md5=36e2277329e7a6cc912306adadac723d&pid=1-s2.0-S2667100X24000033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24000033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X24000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在抢救脓毒性休克患者时,通过使用近红外光谱监测区域脑氧饱和度(rSO2)来计算脑血管反应性参数,从而确定最佳血压。在此,我们旨在分析脑自动调节引导下的最佳血压管理对脓毒性休克患者谵妄发生率和预后的影响。方法这项前瞻性随机对照临床研究在中南大学湘雅医院进行。51例脓毒性休克患者(2020年12月-2022年5月)被纳入研究,并随机分配至实验组(26例)或对照组(25例)。我们使用 ICM+ 软件监测 rSO2 和平均动脉压 (MAP) 的动态变化,并计算脑血管反应性参数组织氧反应性指数,以确定实验组在复苏期间维持正常脑自动调节功能的最佳血压。对照组按照《脓毒症生存运动指南》进行治疗。结果 51例患者中,男性39例,女性12例,平均年龄(57.0±14.9)岁。谵妄发生率为 40.1%(23/51),28 天死亡率为 29.4%(15/51)。与对照组相比,实验组患者在入住重症监护室(ICU)头 24 小时内的平均血压较高([84.5±12.2] mmHg vs. [77.4±11.8] mmHg,P=0.040),谵妄发生率较低(30.8% vs. 60.0%,P=0.036)。实验组比对照组的谵妄发生率更低(30.8% 对 60.0%,P=0.036),使用脑自动调节引导的最佳血压(几率比 [OR]=0.090,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.009至0.923,P=0.043)和ICU住院时间(OR=1.473,95% CI:1.093至1.985,P=0.011)是脓毒性休克期间谵妄的危险因素。血管活性药物剂量(OR=8.445,95% CI:1.26 至 56.576,P=0.028)和氧分压(PaO2)(OR=0.958,95% CI:0.921 至 0.996,P=0.032)是 28 天死亡率的风险因素。结论休克复苏期间使用脑自动调节引导的最佳血压管理可降低脓毒性休克患者谵妄的发生率。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov ldentifer: NCT03879317
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management reduced the risk of delirium in patients with septic shock

Background

When resuscitating patients with septic shock, cerebrovascular reactivity parameters are calculated by monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) using near-infrared spectroscopy to determine the optimal blood pressure. Here, we aimed to analyze the impact of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management on the incidence of delirium and the prognosis of patients with septic shock.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled clinical study was conducted in the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China. Fifty-one patients with septic shock (December 2020–May 2022) were enrolled and randomly allocated to the experimental (n=26) or control group (n=25). Using the ICM+ software, we monitored the dynamic changes in rSO2 and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and calculated the cerebrovascular reactivity parameter tissue oxygen reactivity index to determine the optimal blood pressure to maintain normal cerebral autoregulation function during resuscitation in the experimental group. The control group was treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Differences in the incidence of delirium and 28-day mortality between the two groups were compared, and the risk factors were analyzed.

Results

The 51 patients, including 39 male and 12 female, had a mean age of (57.0±14.9) years. The incidence of delirium was 40.1% (23/51), and the 28-day mortality rate was 29.4% (15/51). The mean MAP during the first 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was higher ([84.5±12.2] mmHg vs. [77.4±11.8] mmHg, P=0.040), and the incidence of delirium was lower (30.8% vs. 60.0%, P=0.036) in the experimental group than in the control group. The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure (odds ratio [OR]=0.090, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.009 to 0.923, P=0.043) and length of ICU stay (OR=1.473, 95% CI: 1.093 to 1.985, P=0.011) were risk factors for delirium during septic shock. Vasoactive drug dose (OR=8.445, 95% CI: 1.26 to 56.576, P=0.028) and partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (OR=0.958, 95% CI: 0.921 to 0.996, P=0.032) were the risk factors for 28-day mortality.

Conclusions

The use of cerebral autoregulation-directed optimal blood pressure management during shock resuscitation reduces the incidence of delirium in patients with septic shock.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov ldentifer: NCT03879317

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Advancing understanding and management of invasive fungal diseases in the intensive care unit: Insights from FUNDICU consensus definitions Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions Association between hyperglycemia at ICU admission and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Analysis of the MIMIC-IV database Adaptive platform trials in critical care Metabolomic profiling and prognostication in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1