全球相似,地方相异?- 居住在马拉维湖、奥赫里德湖和贝加尔湖中的小型底栖无脊椎动物群落比较

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Great Lakes Research Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102305
Benjamin Wilden, Nabil Majdi, Walter Traunspurger
{"title":"全球相似,地方相异?- 居住在马拉维湖、奥赫里德湖和贝加尔湖中的小型底栖无脊椎动物群落比较","authors":"Benjamin Wilden,&nbsp;Nabil Majdi,&nbsp;Walter Traunspurger","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with &gt;80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"50 3","pages":"Article 102305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327/pdfft?md5=09f21edb9c94d8ee16f97a43295c47ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0380133024000327-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global resemblance, local divergence? – A comparison of meiobenthic invertebrate communities dwelling in ancient lakes Malawi, Ohrid and Baikal\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wilden,&nbsp;Nabil Majdi,&nbsp;Walter Traunspurger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with &gt;80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327/pdfft?md5=09f21edb9c94d8ee16f97a43295c47ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0380133024000327-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古代湖泊是众所周知的生物多样性热点地区,为研究多样性模式提供了独特的机会。我们比较了位于三大洲的三个古代湖泊的沿岸(软底质和硬底质)和底层(软底质)小型底栖生物的分布和群落特征:贝加尔湖(亚洲)、奥赫里德湖(欧洲)和马拉维湖(非洲)。我们预计,对于小型底栖生物等微小生物而言,群落结构受当地栖息地特征的影响要大于湖泊之间空间距离的影响。这一点在深渊中得到了证实,这个独特的系统在不同湖泊中的小型底栖生物丰度(每平方米约 500,000 个)和生物量(每平方米约 100 毫克干重)并无差异。不同湖泊和栖息地的群落结构发生了显著变化,深层群落和沿岸群落之间存在明显差异。摇蚊、桡足类和沙丁鱼是沿岸群落的典型代表,而线虫则在深层群落中占主导地位,占80%。轮虫在沿岸硬底质群落中占 50% 以上,而在贝加尔湖则以桡足类为主。线虫的丰度-生物量回归结果表明,深层栖息地和沿岸栖息地之间的营养传递效率和承载能力有显著差异,但湖泊之间没有差异。尽管如此,首次对三个古老湖泊中的小型底栖生物进行的比较研究表明,为了更好地了解这些系统,有必要进行更深入的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global resemblance, local divergence? – A comparison of meiobenthic invertebrate communities dwelling in ancient lakes Malawi, Ohrid and Baikal

Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m2) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m2) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m2) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m2).

The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with >80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Journal of Great Lakes Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Revisiting zooplankton as indicators in the Great Lakes: Which indicators detect temporal changes in the zooplankton community composition? Vertical distribution of Lake Superior cisco (Coregonus artedi) spawning aggregations and implications for population monitoring Cyanobacteria in cold waters: A study of nearshore cyanobacteria assemblages in Lake Superior Lake Superior fish community and fisheries, 2001–2022: An era of stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1