食道梗阻的磁压吻合术:适应症、禁忌症、方法和技术策略

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2024.02.001
{"title":"食道梗阻的磁压吻合术:适应症、禁忌症、方法和技术策略","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>There are several limitations to the application of conventional endoscopic therapy for refractory </span>esophageal stenosis<span><span><span> and even atresia<span>, and the secondary option of surgery involving reanastomosis also has drawbacks. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a novel technique that relies on magnetic attraction for </span></span>recanalization and the repair of </span>esophageal obstruction. We evaluate and discuss the clinical value and implementation strategies of the MCA technique as a promising countermeasure for esophageal obstruction.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 7 patients with esophageal stenosis or atresia who underwent MCA from December 2015 to June 2023. Gastroscopic combined with laparoscopic-assisted gastroesophageal MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 1; </span>laparotomy and gastroscopic-assisted MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 2; laparoscopic </span>gastrostomy<span> combined with endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 3 and 4; thoracotomy combined with MCA and gastrostomy were performed for patient 5; and endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 6 and 7.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Anastomosis and recanalization were successfully performed for all patients. A total of 42.86% (3/7) of the patients underwent subsequent conventional endoscopic treatment, including balloon dilatation<span> and stent implantation. The incidences of postoperative pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage were both 14.29% (1/7), and no other adverse events occurred. The magnetic complexes were removed at a median of postoperative day 18. All patients resumed oral feeding.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MCA appears to be a safe and effective therapy for the management of severe esophageal stenosis, refractory stenosis, and atresia of different etiologies, locations, lengths, and patterns, with the advantages of less trauma, high safety, and effectiveness. When making the operative proposal, diverse and individualized magnetic compression devices and methods should be flexibly adopted according to the patient's individual characteristics, history, obstruction distance, and obstruction patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 206-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for Esophageal Obstruction: Indications, Contraindications, Methodologies, and Technique Strategies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p><span>There are several limitations to the application of conventional endoscopic therapy for refractory </span>esophageal stenosis<span><span><span> and even atresia<span>, and the secondary option of surgery involving reanastomosis also has drawbacks. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a novel technique that relies on magnetic attraction for </span></span>recanalization and the repair of </span>esophageal obstruction. We evaluate and discuss the clinical value and implementation strategies of the MCA technique as a promising countermeasure for esophageal obstruction.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 7 patients with esophageal stenosis or atresia who underwent MCA from December 2015 to June 2023. Gastroscopic combined with laparoscopic-assisted gastroesophageal MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 1; </span>laparotomy and gastroscopic-assisted MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 2; laparoscopic </span>gastrostomy<span> combined with endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 3 and 4; thoracotomy combined with MCA and gastrostomy were performed for patient 5; and endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 6 and 7.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Anastomosis and recanalization were successfully performed for all patients. A total of 42.86% (3/7) of the patients underwent subsequent conventional endoscopic treatment, including balloon dilatation<span> and stent implantation. The incidences of postoperative pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage were both 14.29% (1/7), and no other adverse events occurred. The magnetic complexes were removed at a median of postoperative day 18. All patients resumed oral feeding.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MCA appears to be a safe and effective therapy for the management of severe esophageal stenosis, refractory stenosis, and atresia of different etiologies, locations, lengths, and patterns, with the advantages of less trauma, high safety, and effectiveness. When making the operative proposal, diverse and individualized magnetic compression devices and methods should be flexibly adopted according to the patient's individual characteristics, history, obstruction distance, and obstruction patterns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 206-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030724000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的应用传统内窥镜疗法治疗难治性食管狭窄甚至闭锁存在一些局限性,而二次手术(包括重新吻合)也存在缺陷。磁力压缩吻合术(MCA)是一种新技术,它依靠磁力吸引来重新闭塞并修复食道梗阻。我们评估并讨论了 MCA 技术的临床价值和实施策略,将其视为食道梗阻的一种有前途的对策。方法在这项研究中,我们回顾性地纳入了 2015 年 12 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受 MCA 的 7 例食道狭窄或闭锁患者。1号患者行胃镜联合腹腔镜辅助胃食管MCA和空肠造口术;2号患者行开腹手术和胃镜辅助MCA和空肠造口术;3号和4号患者行腹腔镜胃造口术联合内镜辅助MCA;5号患者行开胸术联合MCA和胃造口术;6号和7号患者行内镜辅助MCA。结果 所有患者都成功进行了吻合和再通。42.86%的患者(3/7)随后接受了常规内镜治疗,包括球囊扩张和支架植入。术后肺部感染和吻合口漏的发生率均为14.29%(1/7),未发生其他不良事件。磁性复合体在术后第 18 天被移除。所有患者均恢复了口服喂养。结论:磁性复合器似乎是治疗不同病因、位置、长度和形态的重度食管狭窄、难治性狭窄和闭锁的一种安全有效的疗法,具有创伤小、安全性高、效果好等优点。在制定手术方案时,应根据患者的个体特征、病史、梗阻距离和梗阻形态,灵活采用多样化、个体化的磁加压装置和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for Esophageal Obstruction: Indications, Contraindications, Methodologies, and Technique Strategies

Background and Aims

There are several limitations to the application of conventional endoscopic therapy for refractory esophageal stenosis and even atresia, and the secondary option of surgery involving reanastomosis also has drawbacks. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a novel technique that relies on magnetic attraction for recanalization and the repair of esophageal obstruction. We evaluate and discuss the clinical value and implementation strategies of the MCA technique as a promising countermeasure for esophageal obstruction.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 7 patients with esophageal stenosis or atresia who underwent MCA from December 2015 to June 2023. Gastroscopic combined with laparoscopic-assisted gastroesophageal MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 1; laparotomy and gastroscopic-assisted MCA and jejunostomy were performed for patient 2; laparoscopic gastrostomy combined with endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 3 and 4; thoracotomy combined with MCA and gastrostomy were performed for patient 5; and endoscopic-assisted MCA was performed for patients 6 and 7.

Results

Anastomosis and recanalization were successfully performed for all patients. A total of 42.86% (3/7) of the patients underwent subsequent conventional endoscopic treatment, including balloon dilatation and stent implantation. The incidences of postoperative pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage were both 14.29% (1/7), and no other adverse events occurred. The magnetic complexes were removed at a median of postoperative day 18. All patients resumed oral feeding.

Conclusion

MCA appears to be a safe and effective therapy for the management of severe esophageal stenosis, refractory stenosis, and atresia of different etiologies, locations, lengths, and patterns, with the advantages of less trauma, high safety, and effectiveness. When making the operative proposal, diverse and individualized magnetic compression devices and methods should be flexibly adopted according to the patient's individual characteristics, history, obstruction distance, and obstruction patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1