助产政策研究趋势和新颖性的文献计量分析

Fitriani Nur Damayanti, Ariyani Lutfitasari, Budi Santosa, Sherkia Ichtiarsi Prakasiwi, Suparman, Novita Nining Anggraini
{"title":"助产政策研究趋势和新颖性的文献计量分析","authors":"Fitriani Nur Damayanti, Ariyani Lutfitasari, Budi Santosa, Sherkia Ichtiarsi Prakasiwi, Suparman, Novita Nining Anggraini","doi":"10.25159/2520-5293/14031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Midwifery policy is important in regulating services, and its significance cannot be overstated. Despite the ongoing efforts in formulating policy, there remains a need for further analysis. This is because evidence-based research in midwifery serves as a foundation for enhancing the professionalism of the service practices. Bibliometric analysis of publications pertaining to midwifery policy is absent, leaving a gap in understanding trends and concepts. Therefore, this research aimed to determine trends in the number of publications, and visualisation of the relationship on the topic of midwifery policy through bibliometric analysis. The method used systematic reviews with the stages following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Scientific publication data related to midwifery policy was retrieved through dimensions.ai from 2010 to 2022 and the data was analysed using VOSviewer. The results showed that first, there was an annual exponential growth in the number of publications and citations on the topic. Second, there were 224 items, 8 clusters, and 10047 links with a strength of 63352 on the topic of midwifery policy. Third, trends of research related to the topic were focused on hospitals, behaviour, and framework. Fourth, the research related to policy were topics with a low-density category, namely professional development, registration, and public health. Research results could identify trends and novelty in midwifery policy and recommend directions for further analysis.","PeriodicalId":517190,"journal":{"name":"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Novelty of Midwifery Policy\",\"authors\":\"Fitriani Nur Damayanti, Ariyani Lutfitasari, Budi Santosa, Sherkia Ichtiarsi Prakasiwi, Suparman, Novita Nining Anggraini\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2520-5293/14031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Midwifery policy is important in regulating services, and its significance cannot be overstated. Despite the ongoing efforts in formulating policy, there remains a need for further analysis. This is because evidence-based research in midwifery serves as a foundation for enhancing the professionalism of the service practices. Bibliometric analysis of publications pertaining to midwifery policy is absent, leaving a gap in understanding trends and concepts. Therefore, this research aimed to determine trends in the number of publications, and visualisation of the relationship on the topic of midwifery policy through bibliometric analysis. The method used systematic reviews with the stages following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Scientific publication data related to midwifery policy was retrieved through dimensions.ai from 2010 to 2022 and the data was analysed using VOSviewer. The results showed that first, there was an annual exponential growth in the number of publications and citations on the topic. Second, there were 224 items, 8 clusters, and 10047 links with a strength of 63352 on the topic of midwifery policy. Third, trends of research related to the topic were focused on hospitals, behaviour, and framework. Fourth, the research related to policy were topics with a low-density category, namely professional development, registration, and public health. Research results could identify trends and novelty in midwifery policy and recommend directions for further analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/14031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/14031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

助产政策在规范服务方面非常重要,其意义无论怎样强调都不为过。尽管在制定政策方面一直在努力,但仍有必要进行进一步分析。这是因为助产方面的循证研究是提高服务实践专业性的基础。由于缺乏对助产政策相关出版物的文献计量分析,因此在了解趋势和概念方面存在空白。因此,本研究旨在通过文献计量分析,确定助产政策主题的出版物数量趋势和可视化关系。研究方法采用系统综述,各阶段均遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)图。通过 dimensions.ai 检索了 2010 年至 2022 年与助产政策相关的科学出版物数据,并使用 VOSviewer 对数据进行了分析。结果显示,首先,有关该主题的出版物和引文数量呈指数级逐年增长。其次,助产政策这一主题共有 224 个条目、8 个群组和 10047 个链接,链接强度为 63352。第三,与该主题相关的研究趋势主要集中在医院、行为和框架方面。第四,与政策相关的研究属于低密度类别,即专业发展、注册和公共卫生。研究成果可以发现助产士政策的趋势和新颖性,并提出进一步分析的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Novelty of Midwifery Policy
Midwifery policy is important in regulating services, and its significance cannot be overstated. Despite the ongoing efforts in formulating policy, there remains a need for further analysis. This is because evidence-based research in midwifery serves as a foundation for enhancing the professionalism of the service practices. Bibliometric analysis of publications pertaining to midwifery policy is absent, leaving a gap in understanding trends and concepts. Therefore, this research aimed to determine trends in the number of publications, and visualisation of the relationship on the topic of midwifery policy through bibliometric analysis. The method used systematic reviews with the stages following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Scientific publication data related to midwifery policy was retrieved through dimensions.ai from 2010 to 2022 and the data was analysed using VOSviewer. The results showed that first, there was an annual exponential growth in the number of publications and citations on the topic. Second, there were 224 items, 8 clusters, and 10047 links with a strength of 63352 on the topic of midwifery policy. Third, trends of research related to the topic were focused on hospitals, behaviour, and framework. Fourth, the research related to policy were topics with a low-density category, namely professional development, registration, and public health. Research results could identify trends and novelty in midwifery policy and recommend directions for further analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Contributing to Work Stress among Nurses in Hadiya Zone’s Public Hospitals, Central Ethiopia Preparedness for Natural Disasters among Volunteers in East Java, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Services and Associated Factors among HIV-Positive Women at Mzuzu Central Hospital, Malawi A Scoping Review of Nurse-Led Medical-Surgical Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve In-Hospital Clinical Practice in the WHO Afro Region Analysis of Dominant Factors Affecting Pre-Hospital Stroke Management in Kupang City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1