为接受非霍奇金淋巴瘤和霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗的癌症幸存者提供支持:评估护士主导干预措施的可行性和过程结果的试点研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Seminars in Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151592
Amy J. Spooner , Jane Turner , Elise Button , Patsy Yates , Glen Kennedy , Jason Butler , Natalie Bradford , Alexandre Chan , Nicolas H. Hart , Raymond J. Chan
{"title":"为接受非霍奇金淋巴瘤和霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗的癌症幸存者提供支持:评估护士主导干预措施的可行性和过程结果的试点研究。","authors":"Amy J. Spooner ,&nbsp;Jane Turner ,&nbsp;Elise Button ,&nbsp;Patsy Yates ,&nbsp;Glen Kennedy ,&nbsp;Jason Butler ,&nbsp;Natalie Bradford ,&nbsp;Alexandre Chan ,&nbsp;Nicolas H. Hart ,&nbsp;Raymond J. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Lymphoma is the sixth most common cancer in Australia and comprises 2.8% of worldwide cancer diagnoses. Research targeting development and evaluation of post-treatment care for debilitating complications resulting from the disease and its treatment is limited. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention, post-treatment in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center, prospective, 3-arm, pilot, randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was used. People with lymphoma were recruited and randomized to the intervention (ENGAGE), education booklet only, or usual care arm. Participants receiving ENGAGE received an educational booklet and were offered 3 consultations (via various modes) with a cancer nurse to develop a survivorship care plan and healthcare goals. Participant distress and intervention acceptability was measured at baseline and 12-wk. Acceptability was measured via a satisfaction survey using a 11-point scale. Feasibility was measured using participation, retention rates, and process outcomes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four participants with HL and NHL were recruited to the study (11 = intervention, 11 = information only, 12 = usual care). Twenty-seven participants (79%) completed all time points from baseline to 12 wk. Seven (88%) of the 8 participants receiving ENGAGE completed all consultations using various modes to communicate with the nurse (videoconference 14/23, 61%; phone 5/23, 22%; face-to-face 4/23, 17%). Participants who completed the intervention were highly satisfied with ENGAGE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ENGAGE intervention is feasible and highly acceptable for lymphoma survivors. These findings will inform a larger trial assessing effectiveness and cost effectiveness of ENGAGE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000135/pdfft?md5=1c278c4b794215efb54131cde6d473ba&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124000135-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Cancer Survivors Following Treatment for Non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Pilot Study Assessing the Feasibility and Process Outcomes of a Nurse-Led Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Amy J. Spooner ,&nbsp;Jane Turner ,&nbsp;Elise Button ,&nbsp;Patsy Yates ,&nbsp;Glen Kennedy ,&nbsp;Jason Butler ,&nbsp;Natalie Bradford ,&nbsp;Alexandre Chan ,&nbsp;Nicolas H. Hart ,&nbsp;Raymond J. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Lymphoma is the sixth most common cancer in Australia and comprises 2.8% of worldwide cancer diagnoses. Research targeting development and evaluation of post-treatment care for debilitating complications resulting from the disease and its treatment is limited. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention, post-treatment in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center, prospective, 3-arm, pilot, randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was used. People with lymphoma were recruited and randomized to the intervention (ENGAGE), education booklet only, or usual care arm. Participants receiving ENGAGE received an educational booklet and were offered 3 consultations (via various modes) with a cancer nurse to develop a survivorship care plan and healthcare goals. Participant distress and intervention acceptability was measured at baseline and 12-wk. Acceptability was measured via a satisfaction survey using a 11-point scale. Feasibility was measured using participation, retention rates, and process outcomes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-four participants with HL and NHL were recruited to the study (11 = intervention, 11 = information only, 12 = usual care). Twenty-seven participants (79%) completed all time points from baseline to 12 wk. Seven (88%) of the 8 participants receiving ENGAGE completed all consultations using various modes to communicate with the nurse (videoconference 14/23, 61%; phone 5/23, 22%; face-to-face 4/23, 17%). Participants who completed the intervention were highly satisfied with ENGAGE.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The ENGAGE intervention is feasible and highly acceptable for lymphoma survivors. These findings will inform a larger trial assessing effectiveness and cost effectiveness of ENGAGE.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000135/pdfft?md5=1c278c4b794215efb54131cde6d473ba&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124000135-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124000135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:淋巴瘤是澳大利亚第六大常见癌症,占全球癌症诊断的 2.8%。针对该疾病及其治疗所导致的衰弱性并发症的治疗后护理的开发和评估研究十分有限。本研究旨在评估霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者治疗后由护士主导的幸存者干预措施的可行性和可接受性:方法:采用单中心、前瞻性、三臂、试点、随机对照、平行组试验。淋巴瘤患者被招募并随机分配到干预组(ENGAGE)、仅接受教育手册组或常规护理组。接受ENGAGE治疗的参与者会收到一本教育手册,并与癌症护士进行3次咨询(通过各种方式),以制定幸存者护理计划和保健目标。在基线和 12 周时对参与者的痛苦和干预的可接受性进行测量。可接受性通过满意度调查进行测量,采用 11 分制。可行性通过参与率、保留率和过程结果来衡量。数据采用描述性统计进行分析:研究招募了 34 名患有 HL 和 NHL 的参与者(11 名 = 干预,11 名 = 仅提供信息,12 名 = 常规护理)。27名参与者(79%)完成了从基线到12周的所有时间点。在接受 ENGAGE 的 8 位参与者中,有 7 位(88%)完成了所有咨询,他们使用各种模式与护士沟通(视频会议 14/23,61%;电话 5/23,22%;面对面 4/23,17%)。完成干预的参与者对ENGAGE非常满意:结论:ENGAGE 干预是可行的,淋巴瘤幸存者的接受度很高。这些发现将为评估ENGAGE有效性和成本效益的更大规模试验提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting Cancer Survivors Following Treatment for Non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Pilot Study Assessing the Feasibility and Process Outcomes of a Nurse-Led Intervention

Objective

Lymphoma is the sixth most common cancer in Australia and comprises 2.8% of worldwide cancer diagnoses. Research targeting development and evaluation of post-treatment care for debilitating complications resulting from the disease and its treatment is limited. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led survivorship intervention, post-treatment in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.

Methods

A single-center, prospective, 3-arm, pilot, randomized controlled, parallel-group trial was used. People with lymphoma were recruited and randomized to the intervention (ENGAGE), education booklet only, or usual care arm. Participants receiving ENGAGE received an educational booklet and were offered 3 consultations (via various modes) with a cancer nurse to develop a survivorship care plan and healthcare goals. Participant distress and intervention acceptability was measured at baseline and 12-wk. Acceptability was measured via a satisfaction survey using a 11-point scale. Feasibility was measured using participation, retention rates, and process outcomes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Thirty-four participants with HL and NHL were recruited to the study (11 = intervention, 11 = information only, 12 = usual care). Twenty-seven participants (79%) completed all time points from baseline to 12 wk. Seven (88%) of the 8 participants receiving ENGAGE completed all consultations using various modes to communicate with the nurse (videoconference 14/23, 61%; phone 5/23, 22%; face-to-face 4/23, 17%). Participants who completed the intervention were highly satisfied with ENGAGE.

Conclusion

The ENGAGE intervention is feasible and highly acceptable for lymphoma survivors. These findings will inform a larger trial assessing effectiveness and cost effectiveness of ENGAGE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Masthead Instruments for Assessing Family Functioning in Adults Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. Development of a Scale to Assess Cancer Attitude in the Community. The Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction and Fatigue Training on Anxiety and Fatigue Levels in Children with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1