抗磷脂抗体阳性受试者凝血酶原生成测定作为个性化血栓风险评估:技术现状与展望。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Current Rheumatology Reports Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s11926-024-01140-1
Thomas Foret, Virginie Dufrost, Jeremy Lagrange, Patricia Costa, Guillaume Mourey, Thomas Lecompte, Nadine Magy-Bertrand, Veronique Regnault, Stéphane Zuily, Denis Wahl
{"title":"抗磷脂抗体阳性受试者凝血酶原生成测定作为个性化血栓风险评估:技术现状与展望。","authors":"Thomas Foret, Virginie Dufrost, Jeremy Lagrange, Patricia Costa, Guillaume Mourey, Thomas Lecompte, Nadine Magy-Bertrand, Veronique Regnault, Stéphane Zuily, Denis Wahl","doi":"10.1007/s11926-024-01140-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid positive (aPL +) subjects is a major challenge, and the study of in vitro thrombin generation (thrombin generation assays (TGA)) could provide useful information. Activated protein C (APC) sensitivity is involved in thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome patients. We summarized methods used to assess APC sensitivity with TGA and evaluated the prognostic role of APC resistance through literature search.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>APC resistance induced by aPL is a complex pathway. Several cross-sectional studies assessed APC sensitivity to understand thrombotic event mechanisms in aPL + subjects. Only one prospective cohort had investigated the prognostic impact of APC resistance in aPL + subjects, with a positive and significant correlation between APC sensitivity and the risk of thrombosis during the follow up (hazard ratio, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87]). APC resistance assessed with TGA could be associated with thrombotic events in aPL + subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10761,"journal":{"name":"Current Rheumatology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"178-187"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrombin Generation Assay in Antiphospholipid Antibodies Positive Subjects as a Personalized Thrombotic Risk Assessment: State of the Art and Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Foret, Virginie Dufrost, Jeremy Lagrange, Patricia Costa, Guillaume Mourey, Thomas Lecompte, Nadine Magy-Bertrand, Veronique Regnault, Stéphane Zuily, Denis Wahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11926-024-01140-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid positive (aPL +) subjects is a major challenge, and the study of in vitro thrombin generation (thrombin generation assays (TGA)) could provide useful information. Activated protein C (APC) sensitivity is involved in thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome patients. We summarized methods used to assess APC sensitivity with TGA and evaluated the prognostic role of APC resistance through literature search.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>APC resistance induced by aPL is a complex pathway. Several cross-sectional studies assessed APC sensitivity to understand thrombotic event mechanisms in aPL + subjects. Only one prospective cohort had investigated the prognostic impact of APC resistance in aPL + subjects, with a positive and significant correlation between APC sensitivity and the risk of thrombosis during the follow up (hazard ratio, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87]). APC resistance assessed with TGA could be associated with thrombotic events in aPL + subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Rheumatology Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"178-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Rheumatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-024-01140-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Rheumatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-024-01140-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:抗磷脂阳性(aPL +)患者血栓风险评估是一项重大挑战,体外凝血酶生成研究(凝血酶生成测定(TGA))可提供有用的信息。活化蛋白 C(APC)敏感性与抗磷脂综合征患者的血栓事件有关。我们总结了用 TGA 评估 APC 敏感性的方法,并通过文献检索评估了 APC 抗性的预后作用:由 aPL 诱导的 APC 抗性是一个复杂的途径。一些横断面研究评估了 APC 敏感性,以了解 aPL + 受试者的血栓事件机制。只有一项前瞻性队列研究调查了 aPL + 受试者的 APC 耐药性对预后的影响,结果发现 APC 敏感性与随访期间的血栓形成风险呈显著正相关(危险比为 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87])。用 TGA 评估的 APC 抗性可能与 aPL + 受试者的血栓事件有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thrombin Generation Assay in Antiphospholipid Antibodies Positive Subjects as a Personalized Thrombotic Risk Assessment: State of the Art and Perspectives.

Purpose of the review: Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid positive (aPL +) subjects is a major challenge, and the study of in vitro thrombin generation (thrombin generation assays (TGA)) could provide useful information. Activated protein C (APC) sensitivity is involved in thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome patients. We summarized methods used to assess APC sensitivity with TGA and evaluated the prognostic role of APC resistance through literature search.

Recent findings: APC resistance induced by aPL is a complex pathway. Several cross-sectional studies assessed APC sensitivity to understand thrombotic event mechanisms in aPL + subjects. Only one prospective cohort had investigated the prognostic impact of APC resistance in aPL + subjects, with a positive and significant correlation between APC sensitivity and the risk of thrombosis during the follow up (hazard ratio, 6.07 [95% CI, 1.69-21.87]). APC resistance assessed with TGA could be associated with thrombotic events in aPL + subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in the field of rheumatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of rheumatologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as the many forms of arthritis, osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.
期刊最新文献
How to Distinguish Non-Inflammatory from Inflammatory Pain in RA? Telemedicine for the Care of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Experience, Insights and Future Directions from the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Telemedicine Scientific Interest Group. Treatment of Reactive Arthritis with Biological Agents. Recent Updates on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Myopathies. Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease (RA-ILD): Update on Prevalence, Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, and Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1