绘制植被大类数字地图,为管理策略提供依据

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Rangeland Ecology & Management Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.006
Lucas Phipps, Tamzen K. Stringham
{"title":"绘制植被大类数字地图,为管理策略提供依据","authors":"Lucas Phipps,&nbsp;Tamzen K. Stringham","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecological site descriptions have become a prominent way of describing plant communities across rangelands. Disturbance response groups (DRGs) stratify landscapes by grouping ecological sites on the basis of their responses to natural or anthropogenic disturbances. DRGs allow managers to organize, scale, and evaluate information collected on the ground, thus creating expectations of how sites with similar characteristics will respond to disturbance and management. While the importance and utility of these concepts are well understood, the location and spatial extent of DRGs are not. Uncertainty of DRG location and extent make it challenging to evaluate trends or degradation risks of a given area and difficult to define and organize adaptive management concerns and opportunities on a landscape scale. DRGs are organized by major land resource areas (MLRAs), which can make real-life applications across MLRA boundaries for natural phenomena (e.g., wildfire boundaries) repetitive for specific management objectives. Vegetative great groups have been used to overcome this challenge while retaining the state-and-transition model importance of ecological sites. Presented here is a gridded process for vegetative great group mapping across MLRA boundaries, as well as an assessment of the ecological implications of the information gained about the plant communities through the mapping efforts. The scale and output are designed to fit the Landsat library grid and its derived information. Computer machine learning was used to generate spatial maps of vegetative great groups that were compared with Natural Resources Conservation Services soil survey maps, which are currently used by public land management agencies. Machine learning enhanced accuracy by 14% versus conventional soil mapping, providing a more accurate way to conceptualize and manage plant communities at the landscape scale. Further, predictor variables used in machine learning can supplement our knowledge of ecological process information on sites and aid land managers in understanding the various plant community responses to disturbance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 7-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074242400006X/pdfft?md5=39551ca2ced51fe2d50adbc5347fae28&pid=1-s2.0-S155074242400006X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Mapping of Vegetative Great Groups to Inform Management Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Phipps,&nbsp;Tamzen K. Stringham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecological site descriptions have become a prominent way of describing plant communities across rangelands. Disturbance response groups (DRGs) stratify landscapes by grouping ecological sites on the basis of their responses to natural or anthropogenic disturbances. DRGs allow managers to organize, scale, and evaluate information collected on the ground, thus creating expectations of how sites with similar characteristics will respond to disturbance and management. While the importance and utility of these concepts are well understood, the location and spatial extent of DRGs are not. Uncertainty of DRG location and extent make it challenging to evaluate trends or degradation risks of a given area and difficult to define and organize adaptive management concerns and opportunities on a landscape scale. DRGs are organized by major land resource areas (MLRAs), which can make real-life applications across MLRA boundaries for natural phenomena (e.g., wildfire boundaries) repetitive for specific management objectives. Vegetative great groups have been used to overcome this challenge while retaining the state-and-transition model importance of ecological sites. Presented here is a gridded process for vegetative great group mapping across MLRA boundaries, as well as an assessment of the ecological implications of the information gained about the plant communities through the mapping efforts. The scale and output are designed to fit the Landsat library grid and its derived information. Computer machine learning was used to generate spatial maps of vegetative great groups that were compared with Natural Resources Conservation Services soil survey maps, which are currently used by public land management agencies. Machine learning enhanced accuracy by 14% versus conventional soil mapping, providing a more accurate way to conceptualize and manage plant communities at the landscape scale. Further, predictor variables used in machine learning can supplement our knowledge of ecological process information on sites and aid land managers in understanding the various plant community responses to disturbance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 7-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074242400006X/pdfft?md5=39551ca2ced51fe2d50adbc5347fae28&pid=1-s2.0-S155074242400006X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074242400006X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074242400006X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态地点描述已成为描述牧场植物群落的一种重要方法。干扰反应组(DRGs)根据生态地点对自然或人为干扰的反应对其进行分组,从而对地貌进行分层。干扰反应组允许管理者对实地收集的信息进行组织、标度和评估,从而对具有相似特征的地点将如何应对干扰和管理产生预期。虽然这些概念的重要性和实用性已广为人知,但 DRGs 的位置和空间范围却鲜为人知。由于 DRG 位置和范围的不确定性,对特定区域的趋势或退化风险进行评估具有挑战性,也很难在景观尺度上定义和组织适应性管理问题和机会。DRGs是按主要土地资源区(MLRAs)组织的,这使得针对特定管理目标的跨 MLRA 边界自然现象(如野火边界)的实际应用具有重复性。植被大类已被用来克服这一挑战,同时保留生态地点的状态和过渡模型的重要性。这里介绍的是一个网格化流程,用于绘制跨 MLRA 边界的植被大类图,以及对通过绘制工作获得的植物群落信息的生态影响进行评估。其比例尺和输出设计符合大地遥感卫星库网格及其衍生信息。计算机机器学习用于生成植被大类的空间地图,并与自然资源保护局的土壤调查地图进行比较,后者是公共土地管理机构目前使用的地图。与传统的土壤制图相比,机器学习提高了 14% 的准确性,为景观尺度上的植物群落概念化和管理提供了更准确的方法。此外,机器学习中使用的预测变量可以补充我们对现场生态过程信息的了解,帮助土地管理者了解植物群落对干扰的各种反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital Mapping of Vegetative Great Groups to Inform Management Strategies

Ecological site descriptions have become a prominent way of describing plant communities across rangelands. Disturbance response groups (DRGs) stratify landscapes by grouping ecological sites on the basis of their responses to natural or anthropogenic disturbances. DRGs allow managers to organize, scale, and evaluate information collected on the ground, thus creating expectations of how sites with similar characteristics will respond to disturbance and management. While the importance and utility of these concepts are well understood, the location and spatial extent of DRGs are not. Uncertainty of DRG location and extent make it challenging to evaluate trends or degradation risks of a given area and difficult to define and organize adaptive management concerns and opportunities on a landscape scale. DRGs are organized by major land resource areas (MLRAs), which can make real-life applications across MLRA boundaries for natural phenomena (e.g., wildfire boundaries) repetitive for specific management objectives. Vegetative great groups have been used to overcome this challenge while retaining the state-and-transition model importance of ecological sites. Presented here is a gridded process for vegetative great group mapping across MLRA boundaries, as well as an assessment of the ecological implications of the information gained about the plant communities through the mapping efforts. The scale and output are designed to fit the Landsat library grid and its derived information. Computer machine learning was used to generate spatial maps of vegetative great groups that were compared with Natural Resources Conservation Services soil survey maps, which are currently used by public land management agencies. Machine learning enhanced accuracy by 14% versus conventional soil mapping, providing a more accurate way to conceptualize and manage plant communities at the landscape scale. Further, predictor variables used in machine learning can supplement our knowledge of ecological process information on sites and aid land managers in understanding the various plant community responses to disturbance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy Through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems Within the Great Basin Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1