针对难治性心脏骤停的体外心肺复苏术:当前实践与证据概述。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Netherlands Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5
Samir Ali, Christiaan L Meuwese, Xavier J R Moors, Dirk W Donker, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Marcel C G van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda
{"title":"针对难治性心脏骤停的体外心肺复苏术:当前实践与证据概述。","authors":"Samir Ali, Christiaan L Meuwese, Xavier J R Moors, Dirk W Donker, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Marcel C G van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda","doi":"10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18952,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Samir Ali, Christiaan L Meuwese, Xavier J R Moors, Dirk W Donker, Anina F van de Koolwijk, Marcel C G van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netherlands Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"148-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netherlands Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏骤停(CA)是一种常见且有可能避免的死因,同时也给公共卫生造成了巨大负担。尽管近几十年来院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的存活率有所提高,但难治性 OHCA 的预后仍然很差。当常规心肺复苏(CPR)失败时,越来越多的人考虑在心肺复苏(ECPR)过程中使用静脉-动脉体外膜氧合来支持抢救措施。ECPR 可立即稳定常规心肺复苏术难治的 CA 患者的血流动力学和呼吸,从而缩短低流量时间,促进良好的神经功能预后。在难治性 OHCA 的情况下,多项研究显示对特定类别的患者有好处。但是,如果在院前环境中实施 ECPR 以缩短低流量时间,从而限制永久性脑损伤,那么 ECPR 可能会更加有效。正在进行的 ON-SCENE 试验可能会为 ECPR 的有效性提供一个明确的答案。本综述旨在介绍有关 ECPR 及其当前发展的最新文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.

Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Netherlands Heart Journal
Netherlands Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Netherlands Heart Journal is to contribute to the national and international literature by publishing scientific papers in the field of cardiovascular medicine. It also provides a platform for Continuing Medical Education for cardiologists and those in training for the speciality of cardiology in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Heart Journal is made available to cardiologists, cardiologists in training, cardiopulmonary surgeons, cardiopulmonary surgeons in training, internists and paediatric cardiologists. The journal is the official journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices. Reply to 'Cost-effectiveness of long term left ventricular assist devices'. The effects of spondylodiscitis on the inflammation burden in infective endocarditis. Growth rates in non-syndromic aneurysms of the ascending aorta: a systematic review. Advancing cardiovascular care-key insights from the Netherlands Heart Journal 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1