Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS, Adam W. Scott BS, Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH
{"title":"美国转移性乳腺癌患者使用姑息治疗服务的城乡差异和趋势。","authors":"Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS, Adam W. Scott BS, Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; <i>p</i>-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural–urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS, Adam W. Scott BS, Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; <i>p</i>-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rural–urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer
Purpose
To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Methods
We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Findings
Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; p-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (p < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.
Conclusions
In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.