美国转移性乳腺癌患者使用姑息治疗服务的城乡差异和趋势。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1111/jrh.12826
Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS, Adam W. Scott BS, Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH
{"title":"美国转移性乳腺癌患者使用姑息治疗服务的城乡差异和趋势。","authors":"Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS,&nbsp;Adam W. Scott BS,&nbsp;Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; <i>p</i>-value for trend &lt;0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural–urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jincong Q. Freeman MPH, MS,&nbsp;Adam W. Scott BS,&nbsp;Ted O. Akhiwu MBBS, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; <i>p</i>-value for trend &lt;0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12826\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估转移性乳腺癌患者使用姑息治疗的趋势和城乡差异:我们分析了 2004-2019 年国家癌症数据库中的数据。姑息治疗服务包括手术、放疗、全身治疗和/或其他疼痛治疗,以控制疼痛或减轻症状;使用情况被二分为 "是/否"。根据美国农业部经济研究局的农村-城市连续代码定义的农村-城市居住地分为 "农村/城市/大都市"。多变量逻辑回归用于检验姑息关怀使用的城乡差异。计算了调整后的几率比(AOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI):在 13.35 万名患者(平均年龄 62.4 [SD = 14.2] 岁)中,86.7%、11.7% 和 1.6% 分别居住在大都市、城市和农村地区;72.5% 为白人,17.0% 为黑人,5.8% 为西班牙裔,2.7% 为亚裔。总体而言,20.3%的人使用姑息治疗,从2004-2005年的15.6%大幅增至2008-2019年的24.5%(每年增长7.0%;趋势结论的P值):在这一全国性、种族多样化的转移性乳腺癌患者样本中,姑息治疗服务的利用率随着时间的推移而增加,但仍未达到最佳水平。此外,我们的研究结果还突显了姑息治疗使用率方面的城乡差异,并表明可能需要推广这些服务,同时解决这一患者群体在获得服务方面的地域不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural–urban disparities and trends in utilization of palliative care services among US patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

To assess trends and rural–urban disparities in palliative care utilization among patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

We analyzed data from the 2004–2019 National Cancer Database. Palliative care services, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and/or other pain management, were provided to control pain or alleviate symptoms; utilization was dichotomized as “yes/no.” Rural–urban residence, defined by the US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service's Rural–Urban Continuum Codes, was categorized as “rural/urban/metropolitan.” Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine rural–urban differences in palliative care use. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Findings

Of 133,500 patients (mean age 62.4 [SD = 14.2] years), 86.7%, 11.7%, and 1.6% resided in metropolitan, urban, and rural areas, respectively; 72.5% were White, 17.0% Black, 5.8% Hispanic, and 2.7% Asian. Overall, 20.3% used palliative care, with a significant increase from 15.6% in 2004–2005 to 24.5% in 2008–2019 (7.0% increase per year; p-value for trend <0.001). In urban areas, 23.3% received palliative care, compared to 21.0% in rural and 19.9% in metropolitan areas (p < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, patients residing in rural (AOR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) or metropolitan (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80–0.89) areas had lower odds of having used palliative care than those in urban areas.

Conclusions

In this national, racially diverse sample of patients with metastatic breast cancer, the utilization of palliative care services increased over time, though remained suboptimal. Further, our findings highlight rural–urban disparities in palliative care use and suggest the potential need to promote these services while addressing geographic access inequities for this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and profitability following rural hospital mergers and acquisitions. Community responses and adaptations following the closure of a rural pharmacy and primary care facility. Weight status underestimation and weight management goals among adults in the rural South of the United States. Social needs and health outcomes in two rural Veteran populations. Association between obesogenic environments and childhood overweight/obesity across the United States: Differences by rurality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1