L2 写作、WCF 处理和改写之间的循环互动:解释 L2 发展中的修改和巩固

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101078
Ali Rastgou
{"title":"L2 写作、WCF 处理和改写之间的循环互动:解释 L2 发展中的修改和巩固","authors":"Ali Rastgou","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although different empirical studies have recently explored the L2 writing–SLA interfaces, how L2 writers modify and consolidate their linguistic knowledge with different levels of perceived complexity remains underexplored. Featuring the qualitative phase of a longitudinal, mixed-methods study with the aim of complementarity, the current study explored the perspectives of 20 low- to mid-intermediate L2 writers about how their consistent engagement in an iterative process of writing, feedback processing and rewriting contributed to L2 development. In-depth explanations and numerous script-specific exemplifications in semi-structured interviews showcased the language learning potential of acting on direct WCF on an extended number of grammatical features over time, resulting in deep WCF processing and substantial cognitive and affective engagement with feedback. Results suggested participants' reliance on the prolonged process to (re)formulate and confirm hypotheses and increasingly accumulate category-based WCF instances from previous and subsequent compositions to abstract most of the underlying rules embedded in direct WCF. The participants explained how different challenges against rule abstraction were resolved, and why some remained unresolved. The study proposes a model illustrating a synergistic interaction between writing, feedback processing and rewriting for L2 writers to gradually consolidate linguistic knowledge. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical implications of the study are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001169/pdfft?md5=6c85248a5408d642d1e46e1b254dd03d&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374323001169-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cyclical interplay between L2 writing, WCF processing and rewriting: Explaining modification and consolidation in L2 development\",\"authors\":\"Ali Rastgou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although different empirical studies have recently explored the L2 writing–SLA interfaces, how L2 writers modify and consolidate their linguistic knowledge with different levels of perceived complexity remains underexplored. Featuring the qualitative phase of a longitudinal, mixed-methods study with the aim of complementarity, the current study explored the perspectives of 20 low- to mid-intermediate L2 writers about how their consistent engagement in an iterative process of writing, feedback processing and rewriting contributed to L2 development. In-depth explanations and numerous script-specific exemplifications in semi-structured interviews showcased the language learning potential of acting on direct WCF on an extended number of grammatical features over time, resulting in deep WCF processing and substantial cognitive and affective engagement with feedback. Results suggested participants' reliance on the prolonged process to (re)formulate and confirm hypotheses and increasingly accumulate category-based WCF instances from previous and subsequent compositions to abstract most of the underlying rules embedded in direct WCF. The participants explained how different challenges against rule abstraction were resolved, and why some remained unresolved. The study proposes a model illustrating a synergistic interaction between writing, feedback processing and rewriting for L2 writers to gradually consolidate linguistic knowledge. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical implications of the study are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001169/pdfft?md5=6c85248a5408d642d1e46e1b254dd03d&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374323001169-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001169\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374323001169","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管最近有不同的实证研究探讨了 L2 写作与语言学习(SLA)之间的关系,但对 L2 写作者如何在不同的感知复杂度下修改和巩固其语言知识的研究仍然不足。本研究是一项以互补为目的的纵向混合方法研究的定性阶段,探讨了 20 位中低级 L2 写作者的观点,即他们在写作、反馈处理和重写的迭代过程中如何坚持不懈地促进 L2 的发展。半结构式访谈中的深入解释和大量针对具体脚本的例证展示了语言学习的潜力,即随着时间的推移,对大量语法特征采取直接的 WCF 行动,从而对 WCF 进行深度加工,并对反馈进行大量的认知和情感参与。结果表明,学员们依靠长期的过程来(重新)提出和确认假设,并从以前和以后的作文中不断积累基于类别的 WCF 实例,从而抽象出直接 WCF 中蕴含的大部分基本规则。参与者解释了如何解决不同的规则抽象难题,以及为什么有些难题仍未解决。本研究提出了一个模型,说明了写作、反馈处理和改写之间的协同互动,从而帮助 L2 写作者逐步巩固语言知识。本研究的理论、方法和教学意义也在讨论之列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cyclical interplay between L2 writing, WCF processing and rewriting: Explaining modification and consolidation in L2 development

Although different empirical studies have recently explored the L2 writing–SLA interfaces, how L2 writers modify and consolidate their linguistic knowledge with different levels of perceived complexity remains underexplored. Featuring the qualitative phase of a longitudinal, mixed-methods study with the aim of complementarity, the current study explored the perspectives of 20 low- to mid-intermediate L2 writers about how their consistent engagement in an iterative process of writing, feedback processing and rewriting contributed to L2 development. In-depth explanations and numerous script-specific exemplifications in semi-structured interviews showcased the language learning potential of acting on direct WCF on an extended number of grammatical features over time, resulting in deep WCF processing and substantial cognitive and affective engagement with feedback. Results suggested participants' reliance on the prolonged process to (re)formulate and confirm hypotheses and increasingly accumulate category-based WCF instances from previous and subsequent compositions to abstract most of the underlying rules embedded in direct WCF. The participants explained how different challenges against rule abstraction were resolved, and why some remained unresolved. The study proposes a model illustrating a synergistic interaction between writing, feedback processing and rewriting for L2 writers to gradually consolidate linguistic knowledge. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical implications of the study are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1