肋骨骨折手术稳定与非手术治疗的院内疗效比较:一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。

Q2 Medicine Acta Informatica Medica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279
Nguyen-Van Dai, Phung Duy Hong Son, Vu Ngoc Tu, Nguyen Viet Anh, Nguyen The May, Vu Kim Duy, Nguyen Viet Dang Quang, Truong Cao Nguyen, Vu Huu Vinh, Nguyen Huu Uoc, Pham Huu Lu, Doan Quoc Hung
{"title":"肋骨骨折手术稳定与非手术治疗的院内疗效比较:一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Nguyen-Van Dai, Phung Duy Hong Son, Vu Ngoc Tu, Nguyen Viet Anh, Nguyen The May, Vu Kim Duy, Nguyen Viet Dang Quang, Truong Cao Nguyen, Vu Huu Vinh, Nguyen Huu Uoc, Pham Huu Lu, Doan Quoc Hung","doi":"10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for the efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with rib fractures is controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical rib fixation for rib fracture with non-operative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our institutional database from three general hospitals (Viet Duc Hospital, Viet Tiep Friendship Hospital & Cho Ray Hospital) was queried to identify patients with flail chest treated with locked plate fixation between December 2021 and February 2023. A medical record review for demographic, injury, hospital, and surgical data was also retrospectively performed for all patients. Characteristics and outcomes of the patients receiving the surgical rib fixation for rib fracture were compared with those without surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients with thoracic trauma were included. The majority of patients were male, and the age range was from 18 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 51.6 years. 52 (31.3%) underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). The highest combined injuries were limb injuries, followed by traumatic brain injury, and maxillofacial trauma. While 1 patient died in the non-surgical group, there was no significant difference in the mortality between the two groups. The surgical group had a slightly shorter hospital stay than the non-surgical group (8.6 days vs. 10.0 days, p-value: 0.038). SSRF group tended toward a lower incidence of pneumonia compared to the non-surgical group (SSRF: 3.8% vs. non-surgical: 7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.426). SSRF group also had a lower incidence of tracheostomy than the non-operative group (SSRF: 0% vs. non-surgical: 1.8%, p-value: 0.337).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operative fixation of a rib fracture in trauma patients resulted in a lower incidence of pneumonia, fewer days of mechanical ventilation, and a shorter hospital stay compared to non-operative treatment group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures with Nonsurgical Management: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen-Van Dai, Phung Duy Hong Son, Vu Ngoc Tu, Nguyen Viet Anh, Nguyen The May, Vu Kim Duy, Nguyen Viet Dang Quang, Truong Cao Nguyen, Vu Huu Vinh, Nguyen Huu Uoc, Pham Huu Lu, Doan Quoc Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for the efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with rib fractures is controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical rib fixation for rib fracture with non-operative treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our institutional database from three general hospitals (Viet Duc Hospital, Viet Tiep Friendship Hospital & Cho Ray Hospital) was queried to identify patients with flail chest treated with locked plate fixation between December 2021 and February 2023. A medical record review for demographic, injury, hospital, and surgical data was also retrospectively performed for all patients. Characteristics and outcomes of the patients receiving the surgical rib fixation for rib fracture were compared with those without surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients with thoracic trauma were included. The majority of patients were male, and the age range was from 18 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 51.6 years. 52 (31.3%) underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). The highest combined injuries were limb injuries, followed by traumatic brain injury, and maxillofacial trauma. While 1 patient died in the non-surgical group, there was no significant difference in the mortality between the two groups. The surgical group had a slightly shorter hospital stay than the non-surgical group (8.6 days vs. 10.0 days, p-value: 0.038). SSRF group tended toward a lower incidence of pneumonia compared to the non-surgical group (SSRF: 3.8% vs. non-surgical: 7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.426). SSRF group also had a lower incidence of tracheostomy than the non-operative group (SSRF: 0% vs. non-surgical: 1.8%, p-value: 0.337).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operative fixation of a rib fracture in trauma patients resulted in a lower incidence of pneumonia, fewer days of mechanical ventilation, and a shorter hospital stay compared to non-operative treatment group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在肋骨骨折患者中,手术稳定肋骨骨折疗效的证据尚存在争议:肋骨骨折患者手术稳定肋骨骨折的疗效证据尚存争议:我们旨在比较肋骨骨折手术固定与非手术治疗的临床疗效:我们查询了三家综合医院(越德医院、越铁友谊医院和赵雷医院)的机构数据库,以确定 2021 年 12 月至 2023 年 2 月间接受锁定钢板固定治疗的外翻胸患者。此外,还对所有患者的人口统计学、损伤、医院和手术数据进行了病历回顾。将接受手术肋骨固定治疗的肋骨骨折患者的特征和预后与未接受手术的患者进行比较:结果:共纳入了 166 名胸部创伤患者。大多数患者为男性,年龄在 18 至 80 岁之间,平均年龄为 51.6 岁。52人(31.3%)接受了肋骨骨折手术稳定治疗(SSRF)。合并损伤最多的是肢体损伤,其次是脑外伤和颌面部创伤。虽然非手术组中有一名患者死亡,但两组患者的死亡率没有明显差异。手术组的住院时间略短于非手术组(8.6 天对 10.0 天,P 值:0.038)。与非手术组相比,SSRF 组的肺炎发病率较低(SSRF:3.8% 对非手术:7%),但这一差异在统计学上并不显著(P 值:0.426)。SSRF 组气管切开的发生率也低于非手术组(SSRF:0% vs. 非手术:1.8%,P 值:0.337):结论:与非手术治疗组相比,手术固定创伤患者肋骨骨折可降低肺炎发生率,减少机械通气天数,缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures with Nonsurgical Management: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study.

Background: Evidence for the efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with rib fractures is controversial.

Objective: We aim to compare the clinical outcomes of surgical rib fixation for rib fracture with non-operative treatment.

Methods: Our institutional database from three general hospitals (Viet Duc Hospital, Viet Tiep Friendship Hospital & Cho Ray Hospital) was queried to identify patients with flail chest treated with locked plate fixation between December 2021 and February 2023. A medical record review for demographic, injury, hospital, and surgical data was also retrospectively performed for all patients. Characteristics and outcomes of the patients receiving the surgical rib fixation for rib fracture were compared with those without surgery.

Results: A total of 166 patients with thoracic trauma were included. The majority of patients were male, and the age range was from 18 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 51.6 years. 52 (31.3%) underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). The highest combined injuries were limb injuries, followed by traumatic brain injury, and maxillofacial trauma. While 1 patient died in the non-surgical group, there was no significant difference in the mortality between the two groups. The surgical group had a slightly shorter hospital stay than the non-surgical group (8.6 days vs. 10.0 days, p-value: 0.038). SSRF group tended toward a lower incidence of pneumonia compared to the non-surgical group (SSRF: 3.8% vs. non-surgical: 7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.426). SSRF group also had a lower incidence of tracheostomy than the non-operative group (SSRF: 0% vs. non-surgical: 1.8%, p-value: 0.337).

Conclusion: Operative fixation of a rib fracture in trauma patients resulted in a lower incidence of pneumonia, fewer days of mechanical ventilation, and a shorter hospital stay compared to non-operative treatment group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Informatica Medica
Acta Informatica Medica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Carotid Stenosis and Pulsatile Index Measured by Transcranial Doppler. Off pump Versus On pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Short-term Outcomes. Comparison of Osseointegration in Novel Laser-Textured and SLA Implants. How Far Goes the Un-ethic of the Authors Who Submit the Articles to the Journals, Or, Better to Say, Their "Scientific Insolence"? Significance of Detecting Antierythrocyte Antibodies in Pretransfusion Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1