[治疗慢性腰背痛的循证干预:个性化医疗方法的治疗选择:德文版]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x
Matthew C Mauck, Aileen F Aylward, Chloe E Barton, Brandon Birckhead, Timothy Carey, Diane M Dalton, Aaron J Fields, Julie Fritz, Afton L Hassett, Anna Hoffmeyer, Sara B Jones, Samuel A McLean, Wolf E Mehling, Conor W O'Neill, Michael J Schneider, David A Williams, Patricia Zheng, Ajay D Wasan
{"title":"[治疗慢性腰背痛的循证干预:个性化医疗方法的治疗选择:德文版]。","authors":"Matthew C Mauck, Aileen F Aylward, Chloe E Barton, Brandon Birckhead, Timothy Carey, Diane M Dalton, Aaron J Fields, Julie Fritz, Afton L Hassett, Anna Hoffmeyer, Sara B Jones, Samuel A McLean, Wolf E Mehling, Conor W O'Neill, Michael J Schneider, David A Williams, Patricia Zheng, Ajay D Wasan","doi":"10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>SM</sup> (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach : German version].\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C Mauck, Aileen F Aylward, Chloe E Barton, Brandon Birckhead, Timothy Carey, Diane M Dalton, Aaron J Fields, Julie Fritz, Afton L Hassett, Anna Hoffmeyer, Sara B Jones, Samuel A McLean, Wolf E Mehling, Conor W O'Neill, Michael J Schneider, David A Williams, Patricia Zheng, Ajay D Wasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>SM</sup> (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schmerz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schmerz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00798-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:慢性腰背痛(cLBP)在美国和全球都非常普遍,会导致功能障碍和生活质量下降。虽然目前有许多治疗慢性腰背痛的方法,但临床医生对哪种治疗方法对个别患者或患者亚群效果最好却知之甚少。背痛研究联合会是美国国立卫生研究院 "长期帮助戒毒SM(HEAL)计划 "的一部分,该联合会将开展一项合作临床试验,旨在开发一种个性化医学算法,以优化患者和医疗服务提供者对 cLBP 患者的治疗选择:本文的主要目的是介绍基于证据的 cLBP 干预措施的最新情况,并描述审查和选择干预措施以纳入临床试验的过程:由 cLBP 专家组成的工作组对纳入临床试验的干预措施进行了审查和筛选。主要评估指标为证据强度和治疗效果大小。如果有文献可查,则考虑疗效持续时间、起效时间、带入效应、多模式疗效、应答者亚组以及治疗效果机制或生物标志物的证据:工作组选择了 4 种领先的循证治疗方法,用于 cLBP 临床试验和常规临床治疗。这些疗法包括:(1) 度洛西汀;(2) 接受和承诺疗法;(3) 基于分类的运动和手法治疗干预;(4) 自我管理方法。这些干预措施均有中高水平的证据支持其治疗效果,并且属于不同的治疗类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach : German version].

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.

Objective: The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.

Methods: A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.

Conclusion: The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Mitteilungen der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft e.V. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Schmerzgesellschaft. [Emotions in chronic pain : Changes in the course of day clinic interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy]. [Pain-related stigma in patients with breast, colon, prostate or lung cancer : Results of a bicentric register-based cross-sectional study]. [Concept-dependent and -independent care effects of site-specific care concepts using "pain" as an example].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1