[吲哚菁绿血浆消失率在临床实践中的分析]。

Q4 Medicine Khirurgiya Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17116/hirurgia20240225
V V Osovskikh, L N Kiseleva, I N Kolokolnikov, M S Vasilieva, A E Bautin
{"title":"[吲哚菁绿血浆消失率在临床实践中的分析]。","authors":"V V Osovskikh, L N Kiseleva, I N Kolokolnikov, M S Vasilieva, A E Bautin","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia20240225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To justify the optimal method for determining indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (PDR<sub>ICG</sub>).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed PDR<sub>ICG</sub> in intensive care units. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg. PDR<sub>ICG</sub> was analyzed simultaneously by using of three methods: 1) PDD (PiCCO2 LiMON device), 2) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on precise spectrophotometer, 3) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on simple experimental photometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDD method was used for 346 PDR<sub>ICG</sub> tests in 256 patients. Of these, 14.3% of measurements were erroneous. Paired tests using PDD and SBS methods were performed in 299 cases. SBS method resulted erroneous data in 0.6% of cases. Certain correlation (<i>r</i>=0.79, <i>p</i><0.001) was found between the reference method (SBS with spectrophotometry) and the PDD method. Bland-Altman plot for these two methods showed that proportional bias of mean difference was caused by extremely high PDR<sub>ICG</sub> of the PDD method (for example, more than 30%/min). Comparison of two SBS variants (spectrophotometer and experimental photometer) revealed good correlation (<i>r</i>=0.91, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBS method for measuring PDR<sub>ICG</sub> ensures accurate results under mechanical interferences in patients with impaired capillary blood flow. This eliminates the need for redo measurement. Duplication of the PDD and SBS methods is recommended when repeating the test is not possible (organ donors).</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate in clinical practice].\",\"authors\":\"V V Osovskikh, L N Kiseleva, I N Kolokolnikov, M S Vasilieva, A E Bautin\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia20240225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To justify the optimal method for determining indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (PDR<sub>ICG</sub>).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed PDR<sub>ICG</sub> in intensive care units. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg. PDR<sub>ICG</sub> was analyzed simultaneously by using of three methods: 1) PDD (PiCCO2 LiMON device), 2) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on precise spectrophotometer, 3) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on simple experimental photometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDD method was used for 346 PDR<sub>ICG</sub> tests in 256 patients. Of these, 14.3% of measurements were erroneous. Paired tests using PDD and SBS methods were performed in 299 cases. SBS method resulted erroneous data in 0.6% of cases. Certain correlation (<i>r</i>=0.79, <i>p</i><0.001) was found between the reference method (SBS with spectrophotometry) and the PDD method. Bland-Altman plot for these two methods showed that proportional bias of mean difference was caused by extremely high PDR<sub>ICG</sub> of the PDD method (for example, more than 30%/min). Comparison of two SBS variants (spectrophotometer and experimental photometer) revealed good correlation (<i>r</i>=0.91, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBS method for measuring PDR<sub>ICG</sub> ensures accurate results under mechanical interferences in patients with impaired capillary blood flow. This eliminates the need for redo measurement. Duplication of the PDD and SBS methods is recommended when repeating the test is not possible (organ donors).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20240225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20240225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:论证测定吲哚菁绿血浆消失率(PDRICG)的最佳方法:证明测定吲哚菁绿血浆消失率(PDRICG)的最佳方法:我们分析了重症监护病房的 PDRICG。吲哚菁绿的静脉注射剂量为 0.25 mg/kg。同时使用三种方法分析 PDRICG:1)PDD(PiCCO2 LiMON 装置);2)SBS,使用精密分光光度计分析血浆样本;3)SBS,使用简易实验光度计分析血浆样本:结果:256 名患者的 346 次 PDRICG 检测使用了 PDD 方法。其中,14.3%的测量出现错误。使用 PDD 和 SBS 方法对 299 例患者进行了配对测试。SBS 方法导致 0.6% 的病例出现数据错误。PDD 方法的 pICG 具有一定的相关性(例如,超过 30%/分钟)(r=0.79)。两种 SBS 变体(分光光度计和实验光度计)的比较显示出良好的相关性(r=0.91,pCG):在毛细血管血流受损的患者中,SBS 测量 PDRICG 的方法可确保在机械干扰下得出准确的结果。这消除了重做测量的需要。如果无法重复测试(器官捐献者),建议重复使用 PDD 和 SBS 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Analysis of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate in clinical practice].

Objective: To justify the optimal method for determining indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (PDRICG).

Material and methods: We analyzed PDRICG in intensive care units. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg. PDRICG was analyzed simultaneously by using of three methods: 1) PDD (PiCCO2 LiMON device), 2) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on precise spectrophotometer, 3) SBS with analysis of plasma samples on simple experimental photometer.

Results: PDD method was used for 346 PDRICG tests in 256 patients. Of these, 14.3% of measurements were erroneous. Paired tests using PDD and SBS methods were performed in 299 cases. SBS method resulted erroneous data in 0.6% of cases. Certain correlation (r=0.79, p<0.001) was found between the reference method (SBS with spectrophotometry) and the PDD method. Bland-Altman plot for these two methods showed that proportional bias of mean difference was caused by extremely high PDRICG of the PDD method (for example, more than 30%/min). Comparison of two SBS variants (spectrophotometer and experimental photometer) revealed good correlation (r=0.91, p<0.001).

Conclusion: SBS method for measuring PDRICG ensures accurate results under mechanical interferences in patients with impaired capillary blood flow. This eliminates the need for redo measurement. Duplication of the PDD and SBS methods is recommended when repeating the test is not possible (organ donors).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
期刊最新文献
[Endoscopic stenting for malignant pancreatobiliary strictures]. [Ankle replacement for severe post-traumatic deformation of the distal tibia: a case report]. [Comparative analysis of in-hospital and long-term results of patients with acute dysfunction of coronary bypass grafts depending on treatment tactics]. [Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment of patients with pathological tortuosity of the internal carotid artery]. [Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1