阿拉伯语版疼痛敏感性问卷的翻译、跨文化适应和测量特性。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2024-02-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449
Abdullah Alqarni, Fayaz Khan, Umar Alabasi, Ruth Ruscheweyh
{"title":"阿拉伯语版疼痛敏感性问卷的翻译、跨文化适应和测量特性。","authors":"Abdullah Alqarni, Fayaz Khan, Umar Alabasi, Ruth Ruscheweyh","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a reliable and valid self-reported tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in clinical practice. The PSQ has been translated, validated, and cross-culturally adapted into multiple languages. However, a validated Arabic version of the PSQ is not available. Thus, this study aims to translate, validate, and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PSQ into the Arabic language.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The English version of the PSQ was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic following international guidelines. The psychometric properties of the final version of the PSQ-Arabic (PSQ-A) were tested among 119 patients with different persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The Cronbach's α for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.76, respectively. The means for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor scores were 5.07 (±1.28), 5.64 (±2.07), and 4.50 (±0.50). The test-retest reliability measured with the interclass correlation coefficient for 68 subjects was 0.80 for the PSQ-A-total, 0.74 for the PSQ-A-moderate, and 0.77 for the PSQ-A-minor. The PSQ-A-total and the PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (<i>r</i> = 0.15, 0.17); <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05), respectively. The PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-pain scores (<i>r</i> = 0.47, 0.43, 0.45; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01), respectively and with the BPI-pain interference scores (<i>r</i> = 0.37, 0.33, 0.34; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the PSQ-A is a reliable and valid tool to assess individuals with pain sensitivity in Arabic populations. Further studies are recommended to examine the concurrent validity of the PSQ-A against experimental pain sensitivity measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10877041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Arabic version of the pain sensitivity questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Alqarni, Fayaz Khan, Umar Alabasi, Ruth Ruscheweyh\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a reliable and valid self-reported tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in clinical practice. The PSQ has been translated, validated, and cross-culturally adapted into multiple languages. However, a validated Arabic version of the PSQ is not available. Thus, this study aims to translate, validate, and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PSQ into the Arabic language.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The English version of the PSQ was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic following international guidelines. The psychometric properties of the final version of the PSQ-Arabic (PSQ-A) were tested among 119 patients with different persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The Cronbach's α for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.76, respectively. The means for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor scores were 5.07 (±1.28), 5.64 (±2.07), and 4.50 (±0.50). The test-retest reliability measured with the interclass correlation coefficient for 68 subjects was 0.80 for the PSQ-A-total, 0.74 for the PSQ-A-moderate, and 0.77 for the PSQ-A-minor. The PSQ-A-total and the PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (<i>r</i> = 0.15, 0.17); <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05), respectively. The PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-pain scores (<i>r</i> = 0.47, 0.43, 0.45; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01), respectively and with the BPI-pain interference scores (<i>r</i> = 0.37, 0.33, 0.34; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the PSQ-A is a reliable and valid tool to assess individuals with pain sensitivity in Arabic populations. Further studies are recommended to examine the concurrent validity of the PSQ-A against experimental pain sensitivity measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10877041/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1339449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍疼痛敏感度问卷(PSQ)是临床实践中评估疼痛敏感度的一种可靠有效的自我报告工具。PSQ 已被翻译成多种语言,并经过验证和跨文化改编。然而,目前还没有经过验证的阿拉伯语版本的 PSQ。因此,本研究旨在将英语版 PSQ 翻译、验证并跨文化改编成阿拉伯语:方法和材料:按照国际准则将英语版的 PSQ 翻译成阿拉伯语,并进行文化改编。在 119 名患有不同顽固性肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛的患者中测试了最终版阿拉伯语 PSQ(PSQ-A)的心理计量特性:PSQ-A总分、PSQ-A中分和PSQ-C小分的Cronbach's α分别为0.81、0.79和0.76。PSQ-A 总分、PSQ-A 中度分和 PSQ-C 轻度分的平均值分别为 5.07(±1.28)分、5.64(±2.07)分和 4.50(±0.50)分。在 68 名受试者中,PSQ-A 总分的类间相关系数为 0.80,PSQ-A 中分的类间相关系数为 0.74,PSQ-A 小分的类间相关系数为 0.77。PSQ-A 总计和 PSQ-A 轻度分别与疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)呈显著正相关(r = 0.15,0.17);P ≤ 0.05)。PSQ-A总分、PSQ-A中度和PSQ-A轻度分别与简明疼痛量表(BPI)-疼痛评分(r = 0.47、0.43、0.45;P≤0.01)和BPI-疼痛干扰评分(r = 0.37、0.33、0.34;P≤0.01)呈正相关:本研究表明,PSQ-A 是评估阿拉伯人群疼痛敏感性的可靠而有效的工具。建议进一步研究 PSQ-A 与实验性疼痛敏感度测量的并发有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Arabic version of the pain sensitivity questionnaire.

Background: The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) is a reliable and valid self-reported tool for the assessment of pain sensitivity in clinical practice. The PSQ has been translated, validated, and cross-culturally adapted into multiple languages. However, a validated Arabic version of the PSQ is not available. Thus, this study aims to translate, validate, and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the PSQ into the Arabic language.

Methods and materials: The English version of the PSQ was translated and culturally adapted into Arabic following international guidelines. The psychometric properties of the final version of the PSQ-Arabic (PSQ-A) were tested among 119 patients with different persistent musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.

Findings: The Cronbach's α for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.76, respectively. The means for the PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-C-minor scores were 5.07 (±1.28), 5.64 (±2.07), and 4.50 (±0.50). The test-retest reliability measured with the interclass correlation coefficient for 68 subjects was 0.80 for the PSQ-A-total, 0.74 for the PSQ-A-moderate, and 0.77 for the PSQ-A-minor. The PSQ-A-total and the PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) (r = 0.15, 0.17); P ≤ 0.05), respectively. The PSQ-A-total, PSQ-A-moderate, and PSQ-A-minor showed positive significant correlations with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-pain scores (r = 0.47, 0.43, 0.45; P ≤ 0.01), respectively and with the BPI-pain interference scores (r = 0.37, 0.33, 0.34; P ≤ 0.01), respectively.

Conclusions: This study shows that the PSQ-A is a reliable and valid tool to assess individuals with pain sensitivity in Arabic populations. Further studies are recommended to examine the concurrent validity of the PSQ-A against experimental pain sensitivity measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rescue analgesia with a transversus abdominis plane block alleviates moderate-to-severe pain and improves oxygenation after abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating pain in non-verbal critical care patients: a narrative review of the critical care pain observation tool and Its clinical applications. Pediatric pain physician workforce: an assessment of supply and demand. Enhancing analgesia in acute renal colic pain: a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin adjunct to ketorolac-based regimen. Non-opioid psychiatric medications for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1