大韩民国斑马鱼安乐死和人道终点的现状及全国专家征询的指导建议:其他国家的典范。

Zebrafish Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1089/zeb.2023.0086
Sang Wha Kim, Won Joon Jung, Seung Hee Han, Sun Kyeong Kim, Hyunju Ro, Heui Jin Kim, Ja Un Tae, Yi Rang Na, Seung Hyeok Seok
{"title":"大韩民国斑马鱼安乐死和人道终点的现状及全国专家征询的指导建议:其他国家的典范。","authors":"Sang Wha Kim, Won Joon Jung, Seung Hee Han, Sun Kyeong Kim, Hyunju Ro, Heui Jin Kim, Ja Un Tae, Yi Rang Na, Seung Hyeok Seok","doi":"10.1089/zeb.2023.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its introduction as a model organism in the 1980s, the use of zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) in research has expanded worldwide. Despite its now widespread use in research, guidelines to safeguard the ethical treatment of zebrafish, particularly with regard to euthanasia and humane endpoint practices, remain inadequate. One well-recognized example is the use of excess tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) as a means to euthanize zebrafish, regardless of life stage. In this study, through nationwide expert elicitation, we provide a detailed account of zebrafish research practices within the Republic of Korea and the challenges of implementing appropriate methods for euthanasia as a humane endpoint, with many opting for hypothermic shock. We report a local expert consensus for establishing national guidelines to improve zebrafish welfare and good research practice. Suggestions and recommendations for national guidelines were offered. Taken together, our findings raise awareness broadly among zebrafish research practitioners in the field, offer an accurate account of the welfare and treatment of zebrafish in research within the Republic of Korea, and advocate for the development and implementation of national guidelines. As such, our study is useful as a model to adopt the expert elicitation approach to investigate, quantify, and address welfare concerns in zebrafish research, and to establish best practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94273,"journal":{"name":"Zebrafish","volume":"21 1","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Status of the Zebrafish Euthanasia and Humane Endpoint in the Republic of Korea and Guideline Suggestion from Nationwide Expert Elicitation: A Model for Other Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Sang Wha Kim, Won Joon Jung, Seung Hee Han, Sun Kyeong Kim, Hyunju Ro, Heui Jin Kim, Ja Un Tae, Yi Rang Na, Seung Hyeok Seok\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/zeb.2023.0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since its introduction as a model organism in the 1980s, the use of zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) in research has expanded worldwide. Despite its now widespread use in research, guidelines to safeguard the ethical treatment of zebrafish, particularly with regard to euthanasia and humane endpoint practices, remain inadequate. One well-recognized example is the use of excess tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) as a means to euthanize zebrafish, regardless of life stage. In this study, through nationwide expert elicitation, we provide a detailed account of zebrafish research practices within the Republic of Korea and the challenges of implementing appropriate methods for euthanasia as a humane endpoint, with many opting for hypothermic shock. We report a local expert consensus for establishing national guidelines to improve zebrafish welfare and good research practice. Suggestions and recommendations for national guidelines were offered. Taken together, our findings raise awareness broadly among zebrafish research practitioners in the field, offer an accurate account of the welfare and treatment of zebrafish in research within the Republic of Korea, and advocate for the development and implementation of national guidelines. As such, our study is useful as a model to adopt the expert elicitation approach to investigate, quantify, and address welfare concerns in zebrafish research, and to establish best practice guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zebrafish\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"53-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zebrafish\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2023.0086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zebrafish","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2023.0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 80 年代将斑马鱼(Danio rerio)作为一种模式生物引入以来,斑马鱼在研究中的应用已扩展到全世界。尽管现在斑马鱼在研究中得到了广泛的应用,但保障斑马鱼伦理待遇的准则,尤其是安乐死和人道终点实践方面的准则仍然不足。其中一个广为人知的例子是使用过量的甲磺酸三卡因(MS-222)作为安乐死斑马鱼的手段,而不考虑其生命阶段。在本研究中,通过全国范围的专家征询,我们详细介绍了大韩民国的斑马鱼研究实践,以及实施适当的安乐死方法作为人道终点所面临的挑战,其中许多人选择低温休克。我们报告了当地专家就制定国家指导方针以改善斑马鱼福利和良好研究实践达成的共识。我们还为国家指导方针提出了意见和建议。总之,我们的研究结果广泛提高了斑马鱼研究从业人员的认识,准确描述了大韩民国研究中斑马鱼的福利和待遇,并倡导制定和实施国家指导方针。因此,我们的研究可以作为采用专家征询法调查、量化和解决斑马鱼研究中的福利问题以及制定最佳实践指南的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Status of the Zebrafish Euthanasia and Humane Endpoint in the Republic of Korea and Guideline Suggestion from Nationwide Expert Elicitation: A Model for Other Countries.

Since its introduction as a model organism in the 1980s, the use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) in research has expanded worldwide. Despite its now widespread use in research, guidelines to safeguard the ethical treatment of zebrafish, particularly with regard to euthanasia and humane endpoint practices, remain inadequate. One well-recognized example is the use of excess tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) as a means to euthanize zebrafish, regardless of life stage. In this study, through nationwide expert elicitation, we provide a detailed account of zebrafish research practices within the Republic of Korea and the challenges of implementing appropriate methods for euthanasia as a humane endpoint, with many opting for hypothermic shock. We report a local expert consensus for establishing national guidelines to improve zebrafish welfare and good research practice. Suggestions and recommendations for national guidelines were offered. Taken together, our findings raise awareness broadly among zebrafish research practitioners in the field, offer an accurate account of the welfare and treatment of zebrafish in research within the Republic of Korea, and advocate for the development and implementation of national guidelines. As such, our study is useful as a model to adopt the expert elicitation approach to investigate, quantify, and address welfare concerns in zebrafish research, and to establish best practice guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Improved, High-Yield Method for Isolating Nuclei from Individual Zebrafish Embryos for Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing. Understanding Rigor Mortis Impacts on Zebrafish Gamete Viability. Small Fishes, Big Issues: Species Delimitation in Hemigrammus Marginatus, Gill, 1958 (Acestrorhamphidae: Pristellinae) from Brazilian Coastal Basins Based on Integrative Genetics. An Automated Low-Cost Solution for Creating a Multiple-Step Thermal Gradient to Record Daily Fish Thermoregulatory Behavior. An Image Processing Tool for Automated Quantification of Bacterial Burdens in Zebrafish Larvae.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1