改善美国有感染艾滋病毒风险的年轻人接受和坚持预防艾滋病毒的最佳策略(ATN 149):随机对照因子试验

IF 23.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00252-2
Prof Dallas Swendeman PhD , Prof Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus PhD , Prof Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold PhD , Prof Maria Isabel Fernández PhD , Prof Walter Scott Comulada DrPH , Prof Sung-Jae Lee PhD , Prof Manuel A Ocasio PhD , Kelsey Ishimoto BS , William Gertsch BS , Prof Naihua Duan PhD , Cathy J Reback PhD , Prof Debra A Murphy PhD , Katherine A Lewis MPH
{"title":"改善美国有感染艾滋病毒风险的年轻人接受和坚持预防艾滋病毒的最佳策略(ATN 149):随机对照因子试验","authors":"Prof Dallas Swendeman PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Maria Isabel Fernández PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Walter Scott Comulada DrPH ,&nbsp;Prof Sung-Jae Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Manuel A Ocasio PhD ,&nbsp;Kelsey Ishimoto BS ,&nbsp;William Gertsch BS ,&nbsp;Prof Naihua Duan PhD ,&nbsp;Cathy J Reback PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Debra A Murphy PhD ,&nbsp;Katherine A Lewis MPH","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00252-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), condom use, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and sexual partner reduction help to prevent HIV acquisition but have low uptake among young people. We aimed to assess the efficacy of automated text messaging and monitoring, online peer support, and strengths-based telehealth coaching to improve uptake of and adherence to PrEP, condom use, and PEP among adolescents aged 12–24 years at risk of HIV acquisition in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a four-arm randomised controlled factorial trial, assessing interventions designed to support uptake and adherence of HIV prevention options (ie, PrEP, PEP, condom use, and sexual partner reduction). We recruited young people aged 12–24 years who were at risk of HIV acquisition from 13 community-based organisations, adolescent medicine clinics, and organisations serving people who are unstably housed, people who were previously incarcerated, and other vulnerable young people, and through dating apps, peer referrals, and social venues and events in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA. Young people who tested seronegative and reported being gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men, transgender men or women, or gender diverse (eg. non-binary or genderqueer) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups in a factorial design: automated text messaging and monitoring (AMMI) only, AMMI plus peer support via private social media, AMMI plus strengths-based telehealth coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals, or AMMI plus peer support and coaching. Assignment was further stratified by race or ethnicity and sexual orientation within each interviewer's group of participants. Participants were masked to intervention assignment until after baseline interviews when offered their randomly assigned intervention, and interviewers were masked throughout the study. Interventions were available throughout the 24-month follow-up period, and participants completed baseline and follow-up assessments, including rapid diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and substance use, at 4-month intervals over 24 months. The primary outcomes were uptake and adherence to HIV prevention options over 24 months, measured by self-reported PrEP use and adherence, consistent condom use with all partners, PEP prescription and adherence, and number of sexual partners in participants with at least one follow-up. We used Bayesian generalised linear modelling to assess changes in outcomes over time comparing the four study groups. This study is registered with <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (<span>NCT03134833</span><svg><path></path></svg>) and is completed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We screened 2314 adolescents beginning May 1, 2017, to enrol 1037 participants (45%) aged 16–24 years between May 6, 2017, and Aug 30, 2019, of whom 895 (86%) had follow-up assessments and were included in the analytical sample (313 assigned to AMMI only, 205 assigned to AMMI plus peer support, 196 assigned to AMMI plus coaching, and 181 assigned to AMMI plus peer support and coaching). Follow-up was completed on Nov 8, 2021. Participants were diverse in race and ethnicity (362 [40%] Black or African American, 257 [29%] Latinx or Hispanic, 184 [21%] White, and 53 [6%] Asian or Pacific Islander) and other sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 591 (66%) participants reported anal sex without a condom in the past 12 months. PrEP use matched that in young people nationally, with 101 (11%) participants reporting current PrEP use at baseline, increasing at 4 months to 132 (15%) and continuing to increase in the AMMI plus peer support and coaching group (odds ratio 2·31, 95% CI 1·28–4·14 <em>vs</em> AMMI control). There was no evidence for intervention effect on condom use, PEP use (ie, prescription or adherence), PrEP adherence, or sexual partner numbers. No unanticipated or study-related adverse events occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Results are consistent with hypothesised synergistic intervention effects of evidence-based functions of informational, motivational, and reminder messaging; peer support for HIV prevention; and strengths-based, goal-focused, and problem-solving telehealth coaching delivered by near-peer paraprofessionals. These core functions could be flexibly scaled via combinations of technology platforms and front-line or telehealth HIV prevention workers.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions, US National Institutes of Health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750023002522/pdfft?md5=e03faf9725d693c95beb1c02158e9cd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750023002522-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal strategies to improve uptake of and adherence to HIV prevention among young people at risk for HIV acquisition in the USA (ATN 149): a randomised, controlled, factorial trial\",\"authors\":\"Prof Dallas Swendeman PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Maria Isabel Fernández PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Walter Scott Comulada DrPH ,&nbsp;Prof Sung-Jae Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Manuel A Ocasio PhD ,&nbsp;Kelsey Ishimoto BS ,&nbsp;William Gertsch BS ,&nbsp;Prof Naihua Duan PhD ,&nbsp;Cathy J Reback PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Debra A Murphy PhD ,&nbsp;Katherine A Lewis MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00252-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), condom use, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and sexual partner reduction help to prevent HIV acquisition but have low uptake among young people. We aimed to assess the efficacy of automated text messaging and monitoring, online peer support, and strengths-based telehealth coaching to improve uptake of and adherence to PrEP, condom use, and PEP among adolescents aged 12–24 years at risk of HIV acquisition in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a four-arm randomised controlled factorial trial, assessing interventions designed to support uptake and adherence of HIV prevention options (ie, PrEP, PEP, condom use, and sexual partner reduction). We recruited young people aged 12–24 years who were at risk of HIV acquisition from 13 community-based organisations, adolescent medicine clinics, and organisations serving people who are unstably housed, people who were previously incarcerated, and other vulnerable young people, and through dating apps, peer referrals, and social venues and events in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA. Young people who tested seronegative and reported being gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men, transgender men or women, or gender diverse (eg. non-binary or genderqueer) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups in a factorial design: automated text messaging and monitoring (AMMI) only, AMMI plus peer support via private social media, AMMI plus strengths-based telehealth coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals, or AMMI plus peer support and coaching. Assignment was further stratified by race or ethnicity and sexual orientation within each interviewer's group of participants. Participants were masked to intervention assignment until after baseline interviews when offered their randomly assigned intervention, and interviewers were masked throughout the study. Interventions were available throughout the 24-month follow-up period, and participants completed baseline and follow-up assessments, including rapid diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and substance use, at 4-month intervals over 24 months. The primary outcomes were uptake and adherence to HIV prevention options over 24 months, measured by self-reported PrEP use and adherence, consistent condom use with all partners, PEP prescription and adherence, and number of sexual partners in participants with at least one follow-up. We used Bayesian generalised linear modelling to assess changes in outcomes over time comparing the four study groups. This study is registered with <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (<span>NCT03134833</span><svg><path></path></svg>) and is completed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We screened 2314 adolescents beginning May 1, 2017, to enrol 1037 participants (45%) aged 16–24 years between May 6, 2017, and Aug 30, 2019, of whom 895 (86%) had follow-up assessments and were included in the analytical sample (313 assigned to AMMI only, 205 assigned to AMMI plus peer support, 196 assigned to AMMI plus coaching, and 181 assigned to AMMI plus peer support and coaching). Follow-up was completed on Nov 8, 2021. Participants were diverse in race and ethnicity (362 [40%] Black or African American, 257 [29%] Latinx or Hispanic, 184 [21%] White, and 53 [6%] Asian or Pacific Islander) and other sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 591 (66%) participants reported anal sex without a condom in the past 12 months. PrEP use matched that in young people nationally, with 101 (11%) participants reporting current PrEP use at baseline, increasing at 4 months to 132 (15%) and continuing to increase in the AMMI plus peer support and coaching group (odds ratio 2·31, 95% CI 1·28–4·14 <em>vs</em> AMMI control). There was no evidence for intervention effect on condom use, PEP use (ie, prescription or adherence), PrEP adherence, or sexual partner numbers. No unanticipated or study-related adverse events occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Results are consistent with hypothesised synergistic intervention effects of evidence-based functions of informational, motivational, and reminder messaging; peer support for HIV prevention; and strengths-based, goal-focused, and problem-solving telehealth coaching delivered by near-peer paraprofessionals. These core functions could be flexibly scaled via combinations of technology platforms and front-line or telehealth HIV prevention workers.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions, US National Institutes of Health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Digital Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750023002522/pdfft?md5=e03faf9725d693c95beb1c02158e9cd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750023002522-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750023002522\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750023002522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景接触前预防(PrEP)、使用安全套、接触后预防(PEP)和减少性伴侣有助于预防艾滋病毒的感染,但在年轻人中的接受率很低。我们旨在评估自动短信和监控、在线同伴支持以及基于优势的远程医疗辅导的效果,以提高美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市和美国洛杉矶市新奥尔良市 12-24 岁有感染 HIV 风险的青少年对 PrEP、安全套使用和 PEP 的接受率和坚持率。方法我们开展了一项四臂随机对照因子试验,评估旨在支持接受和坚持 HIV 预防方案(即 PrEP、PEP、安全套使用和减少性伴侣)的干预措施。我们在美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶市和洛杉矶市新奥尔良市的 13 个社区组织、青少年医疗诊所、为无稳定住所者、曾入狱者和其他弱势青少年提供服务的组织,并通过约会应用程序、同伴推荐、社交场所和活动招募了 12-24 岁有感染 HIV 风险的青少年。血清检测呈阴性,并报告自己是男同性恋、双性恋或其他男男性行为者、变性男女或性别多元化者(如非二元或性别平等者)的年轻人都有资格被纳入其中。参与者以因子设计的方式被随机分配到四个干预组中的一个:仅自动短信和监控(AMMI)组、AMMI 加通过私人社交媒体提供同伴支持组、AMMI 加由近距离同伴辅助人员提供的基于优势的远程保健辅导组、AMMI 加同伴支持和辅导组。在每位访谈者的参与者组中,根据种族或民族以及性取向进一步进行分层分配。在基线访谈结束后向参与者提供随机分配的干预措施之前,参与者的干预任务分配是蒙面的,访谈者在整个研究过程中也是蒙面的。干预措施在 24 个月的随访期间一直有效,参与者在 24 个月内每隔 4 个月完成一次基线和随访评估,包括性传播感染、艾滋病和药物使用的快速诊断测试。主要结果是参与者在 24 个月内对艾滋病预防方案的接受和坚持情况,衡量标准包括自我报告的 PrEP 使用情况和坚持情况、与所有性伴侣坚持使用安全套的情况、PEP 处方和坚持情况,以及至少接受过一次随访的参与者的性伴侣数量。我们使用贝叶斯广义线性模型评估了四个研究组的结果随时间的变化。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03134833)注册,并已完成。研究结果我们从2017年5月1日开始筛选了2314名青少年,在2017年5月6日至2019年8月30日期间招募了1037名16-24岁的参与者(45%),其中895人(86%)进行了随访评估,并被纳入分析样本(313人仅被分配到AMMI,205人被分配到AMMI加同伴支持,196人被分配到AMMI加辅导,181人被分配到AMMI加同伴支持和辅导)。随访于 2021 年 11 月 8 日结束。参与者具有不同的种族和民族(362 [40%] 黑人或非裔美国人、257 [29%] 拉美裔或西班牙裔、184 [21%] 白人、53 [6%] 亚洲人或太平洋岛民)和其他社会人口因素。在基线期,591 名参与者(66%)称在过去 12 个月中发生过未使用安全套的肛交行为。PrEP 的使用情况与全国年轻人的情况一致,基线时有 101 人(11%)报告目前使用 PrEP,4 个月后增加到 132 人(15%),并且在 AMMI 加同伴支持和辅导组中继续增加(几率比 2-31,95% CI 1-28-4-14 对比 AMMI 对照组)。没有证据表明干预措施对安全套的使用、PEP 的使用(即处方或坚持使用)、PrEP 的坚持使用或性伴侣人数产生了影响。结果符合以下假设:以证据为基础的信息、激励和提醒功能的协同干预效果;预防艾滋病的同伴支持;由近似同伴的辅助专业人员提供的基于优势、以目标为中心和解决问题的远程医疗辅导。这些核心功能可通过技术平台和一线或远程保健艾滋病预防工作者的组合灵活扩展。资助美国国立卫生研究院青少年艾滋病干预医学试验网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal strategies to improve uptake of and adherence to HIV prevention among young people at risk for HIV acquisition in the USA (ATN 149): a randomised, controlled, factorial trial

Background

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), condom use, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and sexual partner reduction help to prevent HIV acquisition but have low uptake among young people. We aimed to assess the efficacy of automated text messaging and monitoring, online peer support, and strengths-based telehealth coaching to improve uptake of and adherence to PrEP, condom use, and PEP among adolescents aged 12–24 years at risk of HIV acquisition in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA.

Methods

We conducted a four-arm randomised controlled factorial trial, assessing interventions designed to support uptake and adherence of HIV prevention options (ie, PrEP, PEP, condom use, and sexual partner reduction). We recruited young people aged 12–24 years who were at risk of HIV acquisition from 13 community-based organisations, adolescent medicine clinics, and organisations serving people who are unstably housed, people who were previously incarcerated, and other vulnerable young people, and through dating apps, peer referrals, and social venues and events in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA. Young people who tested seronegative and reported being gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men, transgender men or women, or gender diverse (eg. non-binary or genderqueer) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups in a factorial design: automated text messaging and monitoring (AMMI) only, AMMI plus peer support via private social media, AMMI plus strengths-based telehealth coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals, or AMMI plus peer support and coaching. Assignment was further stratified by race or ethnicity and sexual orientation within each interviewer's group of participants. Participants were masked to intervention assignment until after baseline interviews when offered their randomly assigned intervention, and interviewers were masked throughout the study. Interventions were available throughout the 24-month follow-up period, and participants completed baseline and follow-up assessments, including rapid diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and substance use, at 4-month intervals over 24 months. The primary outcomes were uptake and adherence to HIV prevention options over 24 months, measured by self-reported PrEP use and adherence, consistent condom use with all partners, PEP prescription and adherence, and number of sexual partners in participants with at least one follow-up. We used Bayesian generalised linear modelling to assess changes in outcomes over time comparing the four study groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03134833) and is completed.

Findings

We screened 2314 adolescents beginning May 1, 2017, to enrol 1037 participants (45%) aged 16–24 years between May 6, 2017, and Aug 30, 2019, of whom 895 (86%) had follow-up assessments and were included in the analytical sample (313 assigned to AMMI only, 205 assigned to AMMI plus peer support, 196 assigned to AMMI plus coaching, and 181 assigned to AMMI plus peer support and coaching). Follow-up was completed on Nov 8, 2021. Participants were diverse in race and ethnicity (362 [40%] Black or African American, 257 [29%] Latinx or Hispanic, 184 [21%] White, and 53 [6%] Asian or Pacific Islander) and other sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 591 (66%) participants reported anal sex without a condom in the past 12 months. PrEP use matched that in young people nationally, with 101 (11%) participants reporting current PrEP use at baseline, increasing at 4 months to 132 (15%) and continuing to increase in the AMMI plus peer support and coaching group (odds ratio 2·31, 95% CI 1·28–4·14 vs AMMI control). There was no evidence for intervention effect on condom use, PEP use (ie, prescription or adherence), PrEP adherence, or sexual partner numbers. No unanticipated or study-related adverse events occurred.

Interpretation

Results are consistent with hypothesised synergistic intervention effects of evidence-based functions of informational, motivational, and reminder messaging; peer support for HIV prevention; and strengths-based, goal-focused, and problem-solving telehealth coaching delivered by near-peer paraprofessionals. These core functions could be flexibly scaled via combinations of technology platforms and front-line or telehealth HIV prevention workers.

Funding

Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions, US National Institutes of Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram for mortality and cardiovascular risk estimation: a model development and validation study COVID-19 testing and reporting behaviours in England across different sociodemographic groups: a population-based study using testing data and data from community prevalence surveillance surveys Fairly evaluating the performance of normative models – Authors' reply Fairly evaluating the performance of normative models Lifting the veil on health datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1