用 Lambda 风险值分担风险

IF 1.4 3区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Mathematics of Operations Research Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1287/moor.2023.0246
Peng Liu
{"title":"用 Lambda 风险值分担风险","authors":"Peng Liu","doi":"10.1287/moor.2023.0246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the risk-sharing problem among multiple agents using lambda value at risk ([Formula: see text]) as their preferences via the tool of inf-convolution, where [Formula: see text] is an extension of value at risk ([Formula: see text]). We obtain explicit formulas of the inf-convolution of multiple [Formula: see text] with monotone Λ and explicit forms of the corresponding optimal allocations, extending the results of the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text]. It turns out that the inf-convolution of several [Formula: see text] is still a [Formula: see text] under some mild condition. Moreover, we investigate the inf-convolution of one [Formula: see text] and a general monotone risk measure without cash additivity, including [Formula: see text], expected utility, and rank-dependent expected utility as special cases. The expression of the inf-convolution and the explicit forms of the optimal allocation are derived, leading to some partial solution of the risk-sharing problem with multiple [Formula: see text] for general Λ functions. Finally, we discuss the risk-sharing problem with [Formula: see text], another definition of lambda value at risk. We focus on the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text] and a risk measure that is consistent with the second-order stochastic dominance, deriving very different expression of the inf-convolution and the forms of the optimal allocations.","PeriodicalId":49852,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics of Operations Research","volume":"234 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Sharing with Lambda Value at Risk\",\"authors\":\"Peng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/moor.2023.0246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we study the risk-sharing problem among multiple agents using lambda value at risk ([Formula: see text]) as their preferences via the tool of inf-convolution, where [Formula: see text] is an extension of value at risk ([Formula: see text]). We obtain explicit formulas of the inf-convolution of multiple [Formula: see text] with monotone Λ and explicit forms of the corresponding optimal allocations, extending the results of the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text]. It turns out that the inf-convolution of several [Formula: see text] is still a [Formula: see text] under some mild condition. Moreover, we investigate the inf-convolution of one [Formula: see text] and a general monotone risk measure without cash additivity, including [Formula: see text], expected utility, and rank-dependent expected utility as special cases. The expression of the inf-convolution and the explicit forms of the optimal allocation are derived, leading to some partial solution of the risk-sharing problem with multiple [Formula: see text] for general Λ functions. Finally, we discuss the risk-sharing problem with [Formula: see text], another definition of lambda value at risk. We focus on the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text] and a risk measure that is consistent with the second-order stochastic dominance, deriving very different expression of the inf-convolution and the forms of the optimal allocations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematics of Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"234 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematics of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们通过 inf-convolution([公式:见正文]是风险价值([公式:见正文])的扩展)工具,研究了以 lambda 风险价值([公式:见正文])作为偏好的多个代理人之间的风险分担问题。我们得到了具有单调Λ的多个[公式:见正文]的 inf-convolution 的明确公式,以及相应最优分配的明确形式,扩展了[公式:见正文]的 inf-convolution 结果。事实证明,在一些温和的条件下,几个[公式:见正文]的下旋仍是一个[公式:见正文]。此外,我们还研究了一个[公式:见正文]和一个无现金可加性的一般单调风险度量的下旋,包括[公式:见正文]、期望效用和等级依赖期望效用等特例。推导出最优分配的 inf-convolution 表达式和显式,从而得出一般Λ函数下具有多个[公式:见正文]的风险分担问题的部分解。最后,我们用[公式:见正文]讨论风险分担问题,[公式:见正文]是风险 lambda 值的另一个定义。我们将重点放在[公式:见正文]的下旋和与二阶随机支配一致的风险度量上,得出了下旋和最优分配形式的截然不同的表达式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Sharing with Lambda Value at Risk
In this paper, we study the risk-sharing problem among multiple agents using lambda value at risk ([Formula: see text]) as their preferences via the tool of inf-convolution, where [Formula: see text] is an extension of value at risk ([Formula: see text]). We obtain explicit formulas of the inf-convolution of multiple [Formula: see text] with monotone Λ and explicit forms of the corresponding optimal allocations, extending the results of the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text]. It turns out that the inf-convolution of several [Formula: see text] is still a [Formula: see text] under some mild condition. Moreover, we investigate the inf-convolution of one [Formula: see text] and a general monotone risk measure without cash additivity, including [Formula: see text], expected utility, and rank-dependent expected utility as special cases. The expression of the inf-convolution and the explicit forms of the optimal allocation are derived, leading to some partial solution of the risk-sharing problem with multiple [Formula: see text] for general Λ functions. Finally, we discuss the risk-sharing problem with [Formula: see text], another definition of lambda value at risk. We focus on the inf-convolution of [Formula: see text] and a risk measure that is consistent with the second-order stochastic dominance, deriving very different expression of the inf-convolution and the forms of the optimal allocations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics of Operations Research
Mathematics of Operations Research 管理科学-应用数学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15.0 months
期刊介绍: Mathematics of Operations Research is an international journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS). The journal invites articles concerned with the mathematical and computational foundations in the areas of continuous, discrete, and stochastic optimization; mathematical programming; dynamic programming; stochastic processes; stochastic models; simulation methodology; control and adaptation; networks; game theory; and decision theory. Also sought are contributions to learning theory and machine learning that have special relevance to decision making, operations research, and management science. The emphasis is on originality, quality, and importance; correctness alone is not sufficient. Significant developments in operations research and management science not having substantial mathematical interest should be directed to other journals such as Management Science or Operations Research.
期刊最新文献
Dual Solutions in Convex Stochastic Optimization Exit Game with Private Information A Retrospective Approximation Approach for Smooth Stochastic Optimization The Minimax Property in Infinite Two-Person Win-Lose Games Envy-Free Division of Multilayered Cakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1