通过课例研究支持教师在社会课堂动态领域的专业发展

IF 1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.1108/ijlls-10-2023-0140
Jeroen Pronk, Sui Lin Goei, Tirza Bosma, Wilma Jongejan
{"title":"通过课例研究支持教师在社会课堂动态领域的专业发展","authors":"Jeroen Pronk, Sui Lin Goei, Tirza Bosma, Wilma Jongejan","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-10-2023-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Despite their pivotal role in classroom social dynamics, teachers are not always aware of, and/or do not know how to respond to, bottlenecks in these dynamics. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Social Classroom Dynamics Intervention with Lesson Study (SKILS, acronym of the Dutch program name) in supporting teachers with regards to improving their classrooms' social dynamics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A sample of Dutch secondary school classrooms was divided into five SKILS classrooms (<em>n</em> = 86; 53.5% boys; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 13.62 years and <em>SD</em> = 1.02 years) and nine control classrooms (<em>n</em> = 156; 50.6% boys; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 13.55 years and <em>SD</em> = 0.89 years). Involvement in bullying and social cohesion was assessed pre- and post-intervention using student peer reports. Teachers of SKILS classrooms formed SKILS teams of five teachers (<em>N</em> = 25; 60% male; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 42.45 years and <em>SD</em> = 12.81 years; teacher's experience: <em>M</em><sub>T0</sub> = 11.35 years and <em>SD</em> = 8.36 years). Teachers were interviewed post-intervention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>While SKILS had little effect on classroom bullying dynamics, it had a positive effect on student social cohesion. Teachers indicated a learning effect with regard to identifying bottlenecks within classroom dynamics and felt more competent to intervene in response to bottlenecks due to SKILS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The findings suggest that teachers can successfully impact classroom social cohesion by increasing their knowledge of classroom dynamics and working in Lesson Study (LS) teams with colleagues to develop tailored interventions for these dynamics. </p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting teachers’ professional development in the social classroom dynamics domain with lesson study\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Pronk, Sui Lin Goei, Tirza Bosma, Wilma Jongejan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlls-10-2023-0140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Despite their pivotal role in classroom social dynamics, teachers are not always aware of, and/or do not know how to respond to, bottlenecks in these dynamics. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Social Classroom Dynamics Intervention with Lesson Study (SKILS, acronym of the Dutch program name) in supporting teachers with regards to improving their classrooms' social dynamics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A sample of Dutch secondary school classrooms was divided into five SKILS classrooms (<em>n</em> = 86; 53.5% boys; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 13.62 years and <em>SD</em> = 1.02 years) and nine control classrooms (<em>n</em> = 156; 50.6% boys; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 13.55 years and <em>SD</em> = 0.89 years). Involvement in bullying and social cohesion was assessed pre- and post-intervention using student peer reports. Teachers of SKILS classrooms formed SKILS teams of five teachers (<em>N</em> = 25; 60% male; <em>M</em><sub>age-T0</sub> = 42.45 years and <em>SD</em> = 12.81 years; teacher's experience: <em>M</em><sub>T0</sub> = 11.35 years and <em>SD</em> = 8.36 years). Teachers were interviewed post-intervention.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>While SKILS had little effect on classroom bullying dynamics, it had a positive effect on student social cohesion. Teachers indicated a learning effect with regard to identifying bottlenecks within classroom dynamics and felt more competent to intervene in response to bottlenecks due to SKILS.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The findings suggest that teachers can successfully impact classroom social cohesion by increasing their knowledge of classroom dynamics and working in Lesson Study (LS) teams with colleagues to develop tailored interventions for these dynamics. </p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-10-2023-0140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-10-2023-0140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管教师在课堂社交动态中发挥着关键作用,但他们并不总是意识到或不知道如何应对这些动态中的瓶颈。本研究调查了 "社会课堂动态干预与课程研究"(SKILS,荷兰项目名称的首字母缩写)在支持教师改善课堂社会动态方面的有效性。荷兰中学课堂样本被分为五个SKILS课堂(n = 86;53.5%为男生;Mage-T0 = 13.62岁,SD = 1.02岁)和九个对照课堂(n = 156;50.6%为男生;Mage-T0 = 13.55岁,SD = 0.89岁)。在干预前和干预后,使用学生同伴报告对参与欺凌和社会凝聚力进行评估。SKILS教室的教师组成了由五名教师(N = 25;60%为男性;Mage-T0 = 42.45岁,SD = 12.81岁;教师经验:MT0=11.35年,SD=8.36年)。干预后对教师进行了访谈。研究结果虽然 SKILS 对课堂欺凌动态的影响不大,但对学生的社会凝聚力有积极影响。研究结果表明,教师可以通过增加对课堂动态的了解,与同事组成课程研究(LS)小组,针对这些动态制定有针对性的干预措施,从而成功地影响课堂的社会凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting teachers’ professional development in the social classroom dynamics domain with lesson study

Purpose

Despite their pivotal role in classroom social dynamics, teachers are not always aware of, and/or do not know how to respond to, bottlenecks in these dynamics. This study investigated the effectiveness of the Social Classroom Dynamics Intervention with Lesson Study (SKILS, acronym of the Dutch program name) in supporting teachers with regards to improving their classrooms' social dynamics.

Design/methodology/approach

A sample of Dutch secondary school classrooms was divided into five SKILS classrooms (n = 86; 53.5% boys; Mage-T0 = 13.62 years and SD = 1.02 years) and nine control classrooms (n = 156; 50.6% boys; Mage-T0 = 13.55 years and SD = 0.89 years). Involvement in bullying and social cohesion was assessed pre- and post-intervention using student peer reports. Teachers of SKILS classrooms formed SKILS teams of five teachers (N = 25; 60% male; Mage-T0 = 42.45 years and SD = 12.81 years; teacher's experience: MT0 = 11.35 years and SD = 8.36 years). Teachers were interviewed post-intervention.

Findings

While SKILS had little effect on classroom bullying dynamics, it had a positive effect on student social cohesion. Teachers indicated a learning effect with regard to identifying bottlenecks within classroom dynamics and felt more competent to intervene in response to bottlenecks due to SKILS.

Originality/value

The findings suggest that teachers can successfully impact classroom social cohesion by increasing their knowledge of classroom dynamics and working in Lesson Study (LS) teams with colleagues to develop tailored interventions for these dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies
International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
46.20%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The first journal of its kind, The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies publishes lesson and learning studies that are pedagogically aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning in formal educational settings. These studies may take the form of action research, design experiments, formative evaluations or pedagogical research more generally that is designed to foster a democratic, discursive and action orientated inquiry process. The editorial objective of the journal is to promote interdisciplinary and cross-national collaboration between groups of teacher educators, educational researchers and schoolteachers. The International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies (IJLLS) is the official journal of the World Association of Lesson Studies (WALS). WALS is an association of educational researchers and teaching professionals from various countries in the world who are dedicated to educational research that focuses directly on improving the quality of learning in classrooms and other formal learning environments through pedagogical experiments or action research.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between teacher leadership and teacher learning in Japanese lesson study: focusing on the knowledge-creation process Bringing academic disciplines together to focus on literacy: a secondary school case study Practicing variation theory beyond learning study The potential of lesson study in enhancing secondary school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical practices in lesson planning: evidence from Ethiopia The power of feedback in teacher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1