性传播感染的电子伴侣通知:对患者、临床工作人员和州现场流行病学家观点的定性评估。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES AIDS patient care and STDs Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1089/apc.2023.0184
Surabhi Iyer, Dani L Zionts, Christina Psaros, Anisha Tyagi, Jana Jarolimova, Laura Platt, Andrew H Kalweit, Kevin L Ard, Ingrid V Bassett
{"title":"性传播感染的电子伴侣通知:对患者、临床工作人员和州现场流行病学家观点的定性评估。","authors":"Surabhi Iyer, Dani L Zionts, Christina Psaros, Anisha Tyagi, Jana Jarolimova, Laura Platt, Andrew H Kalweit, Kevin L Ard, Ingrid V Bassett","doi":"10.1089/apc.2023.0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Massachusetts (MA), partner notification is routinely offered for new HIV and infectious syphilis cases, but there are no formal partner notification services for gonorrhea and chlamydia. Electronic partner notification (ePN), which allows patients to anonymously notify their partners of sexually transmitted infection exposure, could fill this gap. We evaluated the acceptability of and ideal characteristics for a statewide ePN service in MA. We performed semistructured interviews with patients at a Boston area sexual health clinic and conducted focus groups with clinicians and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Field Epidemiologists (FEs). We developed a codebook and thematically analyzed interview and focus group data; 25% of interviews were double coded. We identified six main themes from our data: (1) partner notification is a relational process and (2) partner notification is situation dependent. There are three pairs of challenges and core values for an effective ePN system: (3) stigmatization versus inclusivity, (4) trust versus mistrust, and (5) privacy versus helpful information sharing. Therefore, (6) a statewide ePN platform must be customizable at each possible step. Although ePN was acceptable across all three groups, the likelihood of individual use was grounded in a patient's sociocultural context, interpersonal relationships, trust in the platform and health authorities, desire to avoid stigmatization, and privacy needs. These factors are best accommodated by a platform that adapts to users' preferences and needs. ePN presents an opportunity to link partners at risk for gonorrhea or chlamydia to clinical care that is complementary to the more labor-intensive FE role.</p>","PeriodicalId":7476,"journal":{"name":"AIDS patient care and STDs","volume":"38 2","pages":"82-92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10890957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Qualitative Assessment of Patient, Clinical Staff, and State Field Epidemiologist Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Surabhi Iyer, Dani L Zionts, Christina Psaros, Anisha Tyagi, Jana Jarolimova, Laura Platt, Andrew H Kalweit, Kevin L Ard, Ingrid V Bassett\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apc.2023.0184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Massachusetts (MA), partner notification is routinely offered for new HIV and infectious syphilis cases, but there are no formal partner notification services for gonorrhea and chlamydia. Electronic partner notification (ePN), which allows patients to anonymously notify their partners of sexually transmitted infection exposure, could fill this gap. We evaluated the acceptability of and ideal characteristics for a statewide ePN service in MA. We performed semistructured interviews with patients at a Boston area sexual health clinic and conducted focus groups with clinicians and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Field Epidemiologists (FEs). We developed a codebook and thematically analyzed interview and focus group data; 25% of interviews were double coded. We identified six main themes from our data: (1) partner notification is a relational process and (2) partner notification is situation dependent. There are three pairs of challenges and core values for an effective ePN system: (3) stigmatization versus inclusivity, (4) trust versus mistrust, and (5) privacy versus helpful information sharing. Therefore, (6) a statewide ePN platform must be customizable at each possible step. Although ePN was acceptable across all three groups, the likelihood of individual use was grounded in a patient's sociocultural context, interpersonal relationships, trust in the platform and health authorities, desire to avoid stigmatization, and privacy needs. These factors are best accommodated by a platform that adapts to users' preferences and needs. ePN presents an opportunity to link partners at risk for gonorrhea or chlamydia to clinical care that is complementary to the more labor-intensive FE role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"82-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10890957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS patient care and STDs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS patient care and STDs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2023.0184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在马萨诸塞州(MA),艾滋病和传染性梅毒新病例的伴侣通知是常规服务,但淋病和衣原体感染没有正式的伴侣通知服务。电子性伴侣通知(ePN)允许患者匿名通知其性伴侣性传播感染的暴露情况,可以填补这一空白。我们评估了马萨诸塞州全州电子伴侣通知服务的可接受性和理想特征。我们对波士顿地区一家性健康诊所的患者进行了半结构化访谈,并与临床医生和马萨诸塞州公共卫生部现场流行病学家(FEs)进行了焦点小组讨论。我们制定了一个编码手册,并对访谈和焦点小组数据进行了主题分析;25% 的访谈进行了双重编码。我们从数据中确定了六大主题:(1)伴侣通知是一个关系过程;(2)伴侣通知取决于具体情况。有效的 ePN 系统有三对挑战和核心价值:(3) 诋毁与包容,(4) 信任与不信任,(5) 隐私与有益的信息共享。因此,(6) 全州范围的电子病历网络平台必须在每一个可能的步骤上都可以定制。尽管电子病历网络在所有三个群体中都是可以接受的,但个人使用的可能性取决于病人的社会文化背景、人际关系、对平台和卫生机构的信任、避免被污名化的愿望以及隐私需求。电子病历提供了一个将淋病或衣原体高危伴侣与临床护理联系起来的机会,是对劳动密集型 FE 角色的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic Partner Notification for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Qualitative Assessment of Patient, Clinical Staff, and State Field Epidemiologist Perspectives.

In Massachusetts (MA), partner notification is routinely offered for new HIV and infectious syphilis cases, but there are no formal partner notification services for gonorrhea and chlamydia. Electronic partner notification (ePN), which allows patients to anonymously notify their partners of sexually transmitted infection exposure, could fill this gap. We evaluated the acceptability of and ideal characteristics for a statewide ePN service in MA. We performed semistructured interviews with patients at a Boston area sexual health clinic and conducted focus groups with clinicians and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Field Epidemiologists (FEs). We developed a codebook and thematically analyzed interview and focus group data; 25% of interviews were double coded. We identified six main themes from our data: (1) partner notification is a relational process and (2) partner notification is situation dependent. There are three pairs of challenges and core values for an effective ePN system: (3) stigmatization versus inclusivity, (4) trust versus mistrust, and (5) privacy versus helpful information sharing. Therefore, (6) a statewide ePN platform must be customizable at each possible step. Although ePN was acceptable across all three groups, the likelihood of individual use was grounded in a patient's sociocultural context, interpersonal relationships, trust in the platform and health authorities, desire to avoid stigmatization, and privacy needs. These factors are best accommodated by a platform that adapts to users' preferences and needs. ePN presents an opportunity to link partners at risk for gonorrhea or chlamydia to clinical care that is complementary to the more labor-intensive FE role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS patient care and STDs
AIDS patient care and STDs 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
22.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Patient Care and STDs is the foremost journal providing the latest developments and research in diagnostics and therapeutics designed to prolong the lifespan and improve quality of life for HIV/AIDS patients. The Journal delivers cutting-edge clinical, basic science, sociologic, and behavior-based investigations in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. Clinical trials, quantitative and qualitative analyses of pilot studies, comprehensive reviews, and case reports are presented from leading experts and scientists around the world. AIDS Patient Care and STDs coverage includes: Prominent AIDS medications, therapies, and antiretroviral agents HIV/AIDS-related diseases, infections, and complications Challenges of medication adherence Current prevention techniques for HIV The latest news and developments on other STDs Treatment/prevention options, including pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis
期刊最新文献
Impact of Expanded HIV Testing and Rapid Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation in Southwest China: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. Burden of Kidney Disease in an Aging Population Living with HIV in the United States. "AIDS at a Crossroads:" Highlights from the 2024 UNAIDS Report. A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of the Motivational Interviewing to Increase PrEP Uptake Intervention Among Black Women in the United States. Identifying Motivators, Facilitators, and Barriers to Engagement and Retention in Anal Cancer Screening Among Men and Women with HIV in One Ryan White HIV/AIDS Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1