昆虫致病假单胞菌可与昆虫致病线虫及其互生细菌共享昆虫宿主。

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY ISME Journal Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1093/ismejo/wrae028
Maria Zwyssig, Anna Spescha, Tabea Patt, Adrian Belosevic, Ricardo A R Machado, Alice Regaiolo, Christoph Keel, Monika Maurhofer
{"title":"昆虫致病假单胞菌可与昆虫致病线虫及其互生细菌共享昆虫宿主。","authors":"Maria Zwyssig, Anna Spescha, Tabea Patt, Adrian Belosevic, Ricardo A R Machado, Alice Regaiolo, Christoph Keel, Monika Maurhofer","doi":"10.1093/ismejo/wrae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A promising strategy to overcome limitations in biological control of insect pests is the combined application of entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and nematodes (EPNs) associated with mutualistic bacteria (NABs). Yet, little is known about interspecies interactions such as competition, coexistence, or even cooperation between these entomopathogens when they infect the same insect host. We investigated the dynamics of bacteria-bacteria interactions between the EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and the NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 isolated from the EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5. Bacterial populations were assessed over time in experimental systems of increasing complexity. In vitro, SM5 was outcompeted when CHA0 reached a certain cell density, resulting in the collapse of the SM5 population. In contrast, both bacteria were able to coexist upon haemolymph-injection into Galleria mellonella larvae, as found for three further EPP-NAB combinations. Finally, both bacteria were administered by natural infection routes i.e. orally for CHA0 and nematode-vectored for SM5 resulting in the addition of RS5 to the system. This did not alter bacterial coexistence nor did the presence of the EPP affect nematode reproductive success or progeny virulence. CHA0 benefited from RS5, probably by exploiting access routes formed by the nematodes penetrating the larval gut epithelium. Our results indicate that EPPs are able to share an insect host with EPNs and their mutualistic bacteria without major negative effects on the reproduction of any of the three entomopathogens or the fitness of the nematodes. This suggests that their combination is a promising strategy for biological insect pest control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50271,"journal":{"name":"ISME Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945363/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entomopathogenic pseudomonads can share an insect host with entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Zwyssig, Anna Spescha, Tabea Patt, Adrian Belosevic, Ricardo A R Machado, Alice Regaiolo, Christoph Keel, Monika Maurhofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ismejo/wrae028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A promising strategy to overcome limitations in biological control of insect pests is the combined application of entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and nematodes (EPNs) associated with mutualistic bacteria (NABs). Yet, little is known about interspecies interactions such as competition, coexistence, or even cooperation between these entomopathogens when they infect the same insect host. We investigated the dynamics of bacteria-bacteria interactions between the EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and the NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 isolated from the EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5. Bacterial populations were assessed over time in experimental systems of increasing complexity. In vitro, SM5 was outcompeted when CHA0 reached a certain cell density, resulting in the collapse of the SM5 population. In contrast, both bacteria were able to coexist upon haemolymph-injection into Galleria mellonella larvae, as found for three further EPP-NAB combinations. Finally, both bacteria were administered by natural infection routes i.e. orally for CHA0 and nematode-vectored for SM5 resulting in the addition of RS5 to the system. This did not alter bacterial coexistence nor did the presence of the EPP affect nematode reproductive success or progeny virulence. CHA0 benefited from RS5, probably by exploiting access routes formed by the nematodes penetrating the larval gut epithelium. Our results indicate that EPPs are able to share an insect host with EPNs and their mutualistic bacteria without major negative effects on the reproduction of any of the three entomopathogens or the fitness of the nematodes. This suggests that their combination is a promising strategy for biological insect pest control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISME Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10945363/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISME Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要克服害虫生物防治的局限性,一种很有前途的策略是将昆虫病原假单胞菌(EPPs)和线虫(EPNs)与互生细菌(NABs)结合起来应用。然而,人们对这些昆虫病原体感染同一昆虫宿主时的种间相互作用,如竞争、共存甚至合作知之甚少。我们研究了从 EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5 中分离出的 EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 和 NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 之间细菌与细菌之间相互作用的动态。在复杂程度不断增加的实验系统中,对细菌种群进行了长期评估。在体外,当 CHA0 的细胞密度达到一定程度时,SM5 就会被淘汰,导致 SM5 群体崩溃。与此相反,两种细菌在注射血液到 Galleria mellonella 幼虫体内时能够共存,这也是另外三种 EPP-NAB 组合的结果。最后,两种细菌都通过自然感染途径给药,即 CHA0 通过口服,SM5 通过线虫传播,从而在系统中加入 RS5。这并没有改变细菌共存的情况,EPP 的存在也没有影响线虫的繁殖成功率或后代的毒力。CHA0从RS5中获益,可能是利用了线虫穿透幼虫肠道上皮所形成的通道。我们的研究结果表明,昆虫病原性假单胞菌能够与昆虫病原性线虫及其互生细菌共享昆虫宿主,而不会对三种昆虫病原菌中任何一种的繁殖或线虫的适应性产生重大负面影响。这表明,它们的结合是一种很有前景的生物虫害控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Entomopathogenic pseudomonads can share an insect host with entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria.

A promising strategy to overcome limitations in biological control of insect pests is the combined application of entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and nematodes (EPNs) associated with mutualistic bacteria (NABs). Yet, little is known about interspecies interactions such as competition, coexistence, or even cooperation between these entomopathogens when they infect the same insect host. We investigated the dynamics of bacteria-bacteria interactions between the EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and the NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 isolated from the EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5. Bacterial populations were assessed over time in experimental systems of increasing complexity. In vitro, SM5 was outcompeted when CHA0 reached a certain cell density, resulting in the collapse of the SM5 population. In contrast, both bacteria were able to coexist upon haemolymph-injection into Galleria mellonella larvae, as found for three further EPP-NAB combinations. Finally, both bacteria were administered by natural infection routes i.e. orally for CHA0 and nematode-vectored for SM5 resulting in the addition of RS5 to the system. This did not alter bacterial coexistence nor did the presence of the EPP affect nematode reproductive success or progeny virulence. CHA0 benefited from RS5, probably by exploiting access routes formed by the nematodes penetrating the larval gut epithelium. Our results indicate that EPPs are able to share an insect host with EPNs and their mutualistic bacteria without major negative effects on the reproduction of any of the three entomopathogens or the fitness of the nematodes. This suggests that their combination is a promising strategy for biological insect pest control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISME Journal
ISME Journal 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: The ISME Journal covers the diverse and integrated areas of microbial ecology. We encourage contributions that represent major advances for the study of microbial ecosystems, communities, and interactions of microorganisms in the environment. Articles in The ISME Journal describe pioneering discoveries of wide appeal that enhance our understanding of functional and mechanistic relationships among microorganisms, their communities, and their habitats.
期刊最新文献
Impact of timing on the invasion of synthetic bacterial communities. Biotics and bacterial function: impact on gut and host health. Saccharomyces boulardii enhances anti-inflammatory effectors and AhR activation via metabolic interactions in probiotic communities. Reversed oxidative TCA (roTCA) for carbon fixation by an Acidimicrobiia strain from a saline lake. Characterizing core microbiota and regulatory functions of the pig gut microbiome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1