在颅内脑动脉瘤的翼状开颅手术中插入手术部位抽吸引流管的疗效。

Hong Bum Kim, Jung Cheol Park, Jae Sung Ahn, Seungjoo Lee, Kuhyun Yang, Wonhyoung Park
{"title":"在颅内脑动脉瘤的翼状开颅手术中插入手术部位抽吸引流管的疗效。","authors":"Hong Bum Kim, Jung Cheol Park, Jae Sung Ahn, Seungjoo Lee, Kuhyun Yang, Wonhyoung Park","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the role of subgaleal closed suction drains in postoperative epidural hematoma (EDH) and wound complications following pterional craniotomy for cerebral aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 5,280 pterional craniotomies performed on 5,139 patients between January 2006 and December 2020. A drain was placed subgalealy and tip of drain was positioned between the bone flap and the deep temporalis. 1,637 cases (31%) had a subgaleal suction drain. We analyzed demographic and clinical variables related to EDH requiring evacuation and wound complications in patients with and without drains. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen cases (0.27%) of EDH requiring evacuation and 30 cases (0.57%) of wound complications were identified. Univariate analysis found that drain insertion, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and operation time were associated with EDH, while drain insertion, SAH, male gender, older age, and longer operation time were associated with wound complications. Multivariate analysis found no significant association between drain use and EDH (OR=1.62, p=0.402) or wound complications (OR=1.45, p=0.342).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine use of subgaleal closed suction drains may not be necessary after pterional craniotomy, as drain insertion was not associated with a reduced risk of EDH requiring evacuation or wound complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of surgical site suction drain insertion in pterional craniotomy for intracranial cerebral aneurysm.\",\"authors\":\"Hong Bum Kim, Jung Cheol Park, Jae Sung Ahn, Seungjoo Lee, Kuhyun Yang, Wonhyoung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the role of subgaleal closed suction drains in postoperative epidural hematoma (EDH) and wound complications following pterional craniotomy for cerebral aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 5,280 pterional craniotomies performed on 5,139 patients between January 2006 and December 2020. A drain was placed subgalealy and tip of drain was positioned between the bone flap and the deep temporalis. 1,637 cases (31%) had a subgaleal suction drain. We analyzed demographic and clinical variables related to EDH requiring evacuation and wound complications in patients with and without drains. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen cases (0.27%) of EDH requiring evacuation and 30 cases (0.57%) of wound complications were identified. Univariate analysis found that drain insertion, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and operation time were associated with EDH, while drain insertion, SAH, male gender, older age, and longer operation time were associated with wound complications. Multivariate analysis found no significant association between drain use and EDH (OR=1.62, p=0.402) or wound complications (OR=1.45, p=0.342).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine use of subgaleal closed suction drains may not be necessary after pterional craniotomy, as drain insertion was not associated with a reduced risk of EDH requiring evacuation or wound complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"265-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449535/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们评估了脑膜下闭式吸引引流管对脑动脉瘤开颅手术后硬膜外血肿(EDH)和伤口并发症的作用:我们评估了脑膜下闭式吸引引流管在脑动脉瘤翼状开颅术后硬膜外血肿(EDH)和伤口并发症中的作用:我们回顾了2006年1月至2020年12月期间为5139名患者实施的5280例蝶开颅手术。引流管放置在颅骨下,引流管尖端位于骨瓣和颞深肌之间。1,637例(31%)患者使用了额骨下抽吸引流管。我们分析了有引流管和无引流管患者中与需要撤离的 EDH 和伤口并发症相关的人口统计学和临床变量。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定相关风险因素:结果:共发现14例(0.27%)需要引流的EDH和30例(0.57%)伤口并发症。单变量分析发现,插入引流管、蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)和手术时间与 EDH 相关,而插入引流管、SAH、男性、年龄较大和手术时间较长与伤口并发症相关。多变量分析发现,引流管的使用与EDH(OR=1.62,P=0.402)或伤口并发症(OR=1.45,P=0.342)无明显关联:结论:在翼管开颅术后可能不需要常规使用气门下闭式抽吸引流管,因为插入引流管并不会降低需要排空的 EDH 风险或伤口并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of surgical site suction drain insertion in pterional craniotomy for intracranial cerebral aneurysm.

Objective: We evaluated the role of subgaleal closed suction drains in postoperative epidural hematoma (EDH) and wound complications following pterional craniotomy for cerebral aneurysm.

Methods: We reviewed 5,280 pterional craniotomies performed on 5,139 patients between January 2006 and December 2020. A drain was placed subgalealy and tip of drain was positioned between the bone flap and the deep temporalis. 1,637 cases (31%) had a subgaleal suction drain. We analyzed demographic and clinical variables related to EDH requiring evacuation and wound complications in patients with and without drains. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associated risk factors.

Results: Fourteen cases (0.27%) of EDH requiring evacuation and 30 cases (0.57%) of wound complications were identified. Univariate analysis found that drain insertion, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and operation time were associated with EDH, while drain insertion, SAH, male gender, older age, and longer operation time were associated with wound complications. Multivariate analysis found no significant association between drain use and EDH (OR=1.62, p=0.402) or wound complications (OR=1.45, p=0.342).

Conclusions: Routine use of subgaleal closed suction drains may not be necessary after pterional craniotomy, as drain insertion was not associated with a reduced risk of EDH requiring evacuation or wound complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Picket fence" an alternative clipping technique for wide necked and large aneurysms: technical nuances in a case series. The natural history of cerebral infundibula: A retrospective cohort study. Safety and effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Multiple AVM with separate nidi, a case report and review the literatures. Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087" inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1