使用 LAMS 在胃肠道超声引导下引流后新发糖尿病:一项试点研究

Teodora Man, Alice Spulber Sfara, Lidia Neamti, Alexandru Istrate, Monica Mihaela Marta, Cristina Pojoga, Radu Seicean, Voicu Rednic, Andrada Seicean
{"title":"使用 LAMS 在胃肠道超声引导下引流后新发糖尿病:一项试点研究","authors":"Teodora Man, Alice Spulber Sfara, Lidia Neamti, Alexandru Istrate, Monica Mihaela Marta, Cristina Pojoga, Radu Seicean, Voicu Rednic, Andrada Seicean","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a serious complication of severe pancreatitis, patients with necrotizing pancreatitis having an increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of new-onset diabetes (NOD) in patients with symptomatic WON after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage with LAMS in a tertiary referral center. The patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after stent removal. These patients were compared with age- and sex-matched asymptomatic WON controls without interventional treatment and healthy controls to assess the one-year occurrence of DM. Diabetes was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 50 patients with symptomatic WON included in the study (male/female ratio, 33:17; median age, 60 years), 13 patients (26%) had pre-existing DM and were excluded. Ten of the remaining 37 patients (27%) without prior DM developed NOD within one year after stent removal, this frequency being higher than in asymptomatic WON controls (18.9%, p=0.581) and healthy controls (2%, p = 0.002). In the symptomatic WON group, NOD patients compared to non-DM patients were older (63.5 vs. 56 years old, p=0.042), had more frequent necrosis > 50% of the pancreatic parenchyma (p=0.002) and had a body-tail location of WON (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) sessions was the only significant factor for NOD occurrence (OR=7.05, p=0.010). NOD patients had poor glycemic control and required more DEN sessions to achieve WON resolution than patients with prior DM (p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage, DM occurred in 27% of previously non-diabetic patients within one year of follow-up. Patients with extensive pancreatic necrosis were more likely to develop NOD, a high number of DEN sessions being a significant risk factor for NOD occurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":" ","pages":"65-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New-onset Diabetes Mellitus after EUS-guided Drainage with LAMS: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Teodora Man, Alice Spulber Sfara, Lidia Neamti, Alexandru Istrate, Monica Mihaela Marta, Cristina Pojoga, Radu Seicean, Voicu Rednic, Andrada Seicean\",\"doi\":\"10.15403/jgld-5142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a serious complication of severe pancreatitis, patients with necrotizing pancreatitis having an increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of new-onset diabetes (NOD) in patients with symptomatic WON after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage with LAMS in a tertiary referral center. The patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after stent removal. These patients were compared with age- and sex-matched asymptomatic WON controls without interventional treatment and healthy controls to assess the one-year occurrence of DM. Diabetes was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 50 patients with symptomatic WON included in the study (male/female ratio, 33:17; median age, 60 years), 13 patients (26%) had pre-existing DM and were excluded. Ten of the remaining 37 patients (27%) without prior DM developed NOD within one year after stent removal, this frequency being higher than in asymptomatic WON controls (18.9%, p=0.581) and healthy controls (2%, p = 0.002). In the symptomatic WON group, NOD patients compared to non-DM patients were older (63.5 vs. 56 years old, p=0.042), had more frequent necrosis > 50% of the pancreatic parenchyma (p=0.002) and had a body-tail location of WON (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) sessions was the only significant factor for NOD occurrence (OR=7.05, p=0.010). NOD patients had poor glycemic control and required more DEN sessions to achieve WON resolution than patients with prior DM (p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage, DM occurred in 27% of previously non-diabetic patients within one year of follow-up. Patients with extensive pancreatic necrosis were more likely to develop NOD, a high number of DEN sessions being a significant risk factor for NOD occurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脱壁坏死(WON)是重症胰腺炎的一种严重并发症,坏死性胰腺炎患者罹患糖尿病(DM)的风险增加。本研究旨在评估在内镜超声(EUS)引导下使用腔内金属支架(LAMS)引流后有症状的坏死性胰腺炎患者新发糖尿病(NOD)的频率:我们对一个三级转诊中心收集的前瞻性数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库收录了在 EUS 引导下使用 LAMS 引流术治疗的无症状 WON 患者。这些患者在支架拆除后接受了至少 12 个月的随访。将这些患者与年龄和性别匹配、未接受介入治疗的无症状 WON 对照组和健康对照组进行比较,以评估一年内糖尿病的发生率。糖尿病的定义符合美国糖尿病协会的标准:在纳入研究的 50 名无症状 WON 患者中(男女比例为 33:17;中位年龄为 60 岁),有 13 名患者(26%)在患病前已患有糖尿病,因此被排除在外。在剩余的 37 名无糖尿病史的患者中,有 10 人(27%)在支架拆除后一年内出现 NOD,这一频率高于无症状 WON 对照组(18.9%,P=0.581)和健康对照组(2%,P=0.002)。在无症状WON组中,NOD患者与非DM患者相比年龄更大(63.5岁对56岁,p=0.042),胰腺实质坏死>50%的频率更高(p=0.002),且WON位置在体尾(p结论:在接受 EUS 引导引流治疗的无症状 WON 患者中,27% 之前未患糖尿病的患者在随访一年内发生了 DM。胰腺大面积坏死的患者更有可能发生非糖尿病性胰腺坏死,大量的DEN治疗是发生非糖尿病性胰腺坏死的重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New-onset Diabetes Mellitus after EUS-guided Drainage with LAMS: A Pilot Study.

Background and aims: Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a serious complication of severe pancreatitis, patients with necrotizing pancreatitis having an increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of new-onset diabetes (NOD) in patients with symptomatic WON after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage with LAMS in a tertiary referral center. The patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after stent removal. These patients were compared with age- and sex-matched asymptomatic WON controls without interventional treatment and healthy controls to assess the one-year occurrence of DM. Diabetes was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria.

Results: Of the 50 patients with symptomatic WON included in the study (male/female ratio, 33:17; median age, 60 years), 13 patients (26%) had pre-existing DM and were excluded. Ten of the remaining 37 patients (27%) without prior DM developed NOD within one year after stent removal, this frequency being higher than in asymptomatic WON controls (18.9%, p=0.581) and healthy controls (2%, p = 0.002). In the symptomatic WON group, NOD patients compared to non-DM patients were older (63.5 vs. 56 years old, p=0.042), had more frequent necrosis > 50% of the pancreatic parenchyma (p=0.002) and had a body-tail location of WON (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) sessions was the only significant factor for NOD occurrence (OR=7.05, p=0.010). NOD patients had poor glycemic control and required more DEN sessions to achieve WON resolution than patients with prior DM (p=0.017).

Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic WON treated by EUS-guided drainage, DM occurred in 27% of previously non-diabetic patients within one year of follow-up. Patients with extensive pancreatic necrosis were more likely to develop NOD, a high number of DEN sessions being a significant risk factor for NOD occurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the 'Pits and Perils' of Analgesic Therapy in Advanced Liver Disease and Cirrhosis. Anatomical Benchmarks in the Training of Gastroenterologists. Lynch Syndrome-associated Genomic Variants. Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Romania. The Role of Adipokines in Chronic Pancreatitis. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1