通过全自动挤奶系统对北美荷斯坦牛的奶牛行为特征进行基因组预测的机器学习方法。

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3168/jds.2023-24082
Victor B. Pedrosa , Shi-Yi Chen , Leonardo S. Gloria , Jarrod S. Doucette , Jacquelyn P. Boerman , Guilherme J.M. Rosa , Luiz F. Brito
{"title":"通过全自动挤奶系统对北美荷斯坦牛的奶牛行为特征进行基因组预测的机器学习方法。","authors":"Victor B. Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Shi-Yi Chen ,&nbsp;Leonardo S. Gloria ,&nbsp;Jarrod S. Doucette ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn P. Boerman ,&nbsp;Guilherme J.M. Rosa ,&nbsp;Luiz F. Brito","doi":"10.3168/jds.2023-24082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying genome-enabled methods that provide more accurate genomic prediction is crucial when evaluating complex traits such as dairy cow behavior. In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive performance of traditional genomic prediction methods and deep learning algorithms for genomic prediction of milking refusals (MREF) and milking failures (MFAIL) in North American Holstein cows measured by automatic milking systems (milking robots). A total of 1,993,509 daily records from 4,511 genotyped Holstein cows were collected by 36 milking robot stations. After quality control, 57,600 SNPs were available for the analyses. Four genomic prediction methods were considered: Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multiple layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and GBLUP. We implemented the first 3 methods using the Keras and TensorFlow libraries in Python (v.3.9) but the GBLUP method was implemented using the BLUPF90+ family programs. The accuracy of genomic prediction (mean square error) for MREF and MFAIL was 0.34 (0.08) and 0.27 (0.08) based on LASSO, 0.36 (0.09) and 0.32 (0.09) for MLP, 0.37 (0.08) and 0.30 (0.09) for CNN, and 0.35 (0.09) and 0.31(0.09) based on GBLUP, respectively. Additionally, we observed a lower reranking of top selected individuals based on the MLP versus CNN methods compared with the other approaches for both MREF and MFAIL. Although the deep learning methods showed slightly higher accuracies than GBLUP, the results may not be sufficient to justify their use over traditional methods due to their higher computational demand and the difficulty of performing genomic prediction for nongenotyped individuals using deep learning procedures. Overall, this study provides insights into the potential feasibility of using deep learning methods to enhance genomic prediction accuracy for behavioral traits in livestock. Further research is needed to determine their practical applicability to large dairy cattle breeding programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224004971/pdfft?md5=ca419f8e6383b8cd8d763e3a8e4c3769&pid=1-s2.0-S0022030224004971-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning methods for genomic prediction of cow behavioral traits measured by automatic milking systems in North American Holstein cattle\",\"authors\":\"Victor B. Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Shi-Yi Chen ,&nbsp;Leonardo S. Gloria ,&nbsp;Jarrod S. Doucette ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn P. Boerman ,&nbsp;Guilherme J.M. Rosa ,&nbsp;Luiz F. Brito\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2023-24082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identifying genome-enabled methods that provide more accurate genomic prediction is crucial when evaluating complex traits such as dairy cow behavior. In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive performance of traditional genomic prediction methods and deep learning algorithms for genomic prediction of milking refusals (MREF) and milking failures (MFAIL) in North American Holstein cows measured by automatic milking systems (milking robots). A total of 1,993,509 daily records from 4,511 genotyped Holstein cows were collected by 36 milking robot stations. After quality control, 57,600 SNPs were available for the analyses. Four genomic prediction methods were considered: Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multiple layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and GBLUP. We implemented the first 3 methods using the Keras and TensorFlow libraries in Python (v.3.9) but the GBLUP method was implemented using the BLUPF90+ family programs. The accuracy of genomic prediction (mean square error) for MREF and MFAIL was 0.34 (0.08) and 0.27 (0.08) based on LASSO, 0.36 (0.09) and 0.32 (0.09) for MLP, 0.37 (0.08) and 0.30 (0.09) for CNN, and 0.35 (0.09) and 0.31(0.09) based on GBLUP, respectively. Additionally, we observed a lower reranking of top selected individuals based on the MLP versus CNN methods compared with the other approaches for both MREF and MFAIL. Although the deep learning methods showed slightly higher accuracies than GBLUP, the results may not be sufficient to justify their use over traditional methods due to their higher computational demand and the difficulty of performing genomic prediction for nongenotyped individuals using deep learning procedures. Overall, this study provides insights into the potential feasibility of using deep learning methods to enhance genomic prediction accuracy for behavioral traits in livestock. Further research is needed to determine their practical applicability to large dairy cattle breeding programs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224004971/pdfft?md5=ca419f8e6383b8cd8d763e3a8e4c3769&pid=1-s2.0-S0022030224004971-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224004971\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030224004971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在评估奶牛行为等复杂性状时,确定能提供更准确基因组预测的基因组赋能方法至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较传统基因组预测方法和深度学习算法对全自动挤奶系统(挤奶机器人)测量的北美荷斯坦奶牛拒奶(MREF)和挤奶失败(MFAIL)的基因组预测性能。36 个挤奶机器人站共收集了 4,511 头基因分型荷斯坦奶牛的 1,993,509 条每日记录。经过质量控制后,有 57,600 个单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 可用于分析。我们考虑了四种基因组预测方法:贝叶斯拉索(LASSO)、多层感知器(MLP)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)。我们使用 Python(3.9 版)中的 Keras 和 TensorFlow 库实现了前三种方法,而 GBLUP 方法则使用 BLUPF90+ 系列程序实现。基于 LASSO,MREF 和 MFAIL 的基因组预测准确率(均方误差)分别为 0.34 (0.08) 和 0.27 (0.08);基于 MLP,分别为 0.36 (0.09) 和 0.32 (0.09);基于 CNN,分别为 0.37 (0.08) 和 0.30 (0.09);基于 GBLUP,分别为 0.35 (0.09) 和 0.31(0.09)。此外,我们还观察到,在 MREF 和 MFAIL 中,基于 MLP 和 CNN 的方法与其他方法相比,被选中的顶级个体的重新排序较低。虽然深度学习方法的准确率略高于 GBLUP,但由于其计算要求较高,而且使用深度学习程序对非基因分型个体进行基因组预测存在困难,因此这些结果可能不足以证明其优于传统方法。总之,本研究提供了使用深度学习方法提高家畜行为性状基因组预测准确性的潜在可行性。要确定其在大型奶牛育种项目中的实际适用性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning methods for genomic prediction of cow behavioral traits measured by automatic milking systems in North American Holstein cattle

Identifying genome-enabled methods that provide more accurate genomic prediction is crucial when evaluating complex traits such as dairy cow behavior. In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive performance of traditional genomic prediction methods and deep learning algorithms for genomic prediction of milking refusals (MREF) and milking failures (MFAIL) in North American Holstein cows measured by automatic milking systems (milking robots). A total of 1,993,509 daily records from 4,511 genotyped Holstein cows were collected by 36 milking robot stations. After quality control, 57,600 SNPs were available for the analyses. Four genomic prediction methods were considered: Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multiple layer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), and GBLUP. We implemented the first 3 methods using the Keras and TensorFlow libraries in Python (v.3.9) but the GBLUP method was implemented using the BLUPF90+ family programs. The accuracy of genomic prediction (mean square error) for MREF and MFAIL was 0.34 (0.08) and 0.27 (0.08) based on LASSO, 0.36 (0.09) and 0.32 (0.09) for MLP, 0.37 (0.08) and 0.30 (0.09) for CNN, and 0.35 (0.09) and 0.31(0.09) based on GBLUP, respectively. Additionally, we observed a lower reranking of top selected individuals based on the MLP versus CNN methods compared with the other approaches for both MREF and MFAIL. Although the deep learning methods showed slightly higher accuracies than GBLUP, the results may not be sufficient to justify their use over traditional methods due to their higher computational demand and the difficulty of performing genomic prediction for nongenotyped individuals using deep learning procedures. Overall, this study provides insights into the potential feasibility of using deep learning methods to enhance genomic prediction accuracy for behavioral traits in livestock. Further research is needed to determine their practical applicability to large dairy cattle breeding programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
An exploration into the sleep of workers on block-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. Characterization of conception rate after embryo transfer in comparison with that after artificial insemination in dairy cattle. Detailed mineral profile of milk, whey, and cheese from cows, buffaloes, goats, ewes and dromedary camels, and efficiency of recovery of minerals in their cheese. Effects of protein and forage source on performance, and splanchnic and mammary net fluxes of nutrients in lactating dairy cows. Exploring a Bayesian sparse factor model-based strategy for the genetic analysis of thousands of MIR-spectra traits for animal breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1