Zachary P. Hill DPM , Joseph R. Brown DPM , Daniel T. DeGenova DO , Benjamin C. Taylor MD
{"title":"创伤性假体周围全踝关节置换骨折的处理:涉及长柄胫骨组件的病例报告","authors":"Zachary P. Hill DPM , Joseph R. Brown DPM , Daniel T. DeGenova DO , Benjamin C. Taylor MD","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065/pdfft?md5=cb59ce21e0224bd8723e4cffd9b0546f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000065-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of traumatic periprosthetic total ankle replacement fractures: A case report involving long-stemmed tibial components\",\"authors\":\"Zachary P. Hill DPM , Joseph R. Brown DPM , Daniel T. DeGenova DO , Benjamin C. Taylor MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065/pdfft?md5=cb59ce21e0224bd8723e4cffd9b0546f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000065-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文献中关于全踝关节置换术(TAR)周围创伤性假体周围骨折的记载并不多,总共不到 13 例。这些损伤给治疗外科医生带来了重建方面的挑战。TAR 的使用率持续上升,因此创伤性假体周围踝关节骨折可能会变得更加频繁。目前讨论这种病理的分类、治疗和结果的文献还很缺乏,而且大多讨论的是术中骨折或应力性骨折。作者对一家一级创伤中心的419名踝关节骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。有两名患者(0.004%)发生了创伤性假体周围踝关节骨折,并通过微创开放复位内固定术(ORIF)进行了手术治疗。本文发表时,这些患者已接受了一年的随访。对患者的治疗结果进行了回顾,包括愈合率、愈合时间和翻修需求。结果显示,在平均5个月的时间里,骨折愈合率为100%(2/2)。患者已恢复到术前的功能水平,可以在没有辅助的情况下行走。没有发现再次手术或术后并发症。据作者所知,我们报告的是首例使用 INBONE 全踝系统(田纳西州孟菲斯市莱特医疗集团)进行 TAR 治疗的创伤后假体周围骨折患者的详细疗效。
Management of traumatic periprosthetic total ankle replacement fractures: A case report involving long-stemmed tibial components
Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).