创伤性假体周围全踝关节置换骨折的处理:涉及长柄胫骨组件的病例报告

Zachary P. Hill DPM , Joseph R. Brown DPM , Daniel T. DeGenova DO , Benjamin C. Taylor MD
{"title":"创伤性假体周围全踝关节置换骨折的处理:涉及长柄胫骨组件的病例报告","authors":"Zachary P. Hill DPM ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Brown DPM ,&nbsp;Daniel T. DeGenova DO ,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Taylor MD","doi":"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73047,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065/pdfft?md5=cb59ce21e0224bd8723e4cffd9b0546f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000065-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of traumatic periprosthetic total ankle replacement fractures: A case report involving long-stemmed tibial components\",\"authors\":\"Zachary P. Hill DPM ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Brown DPM ,&nbsp;Daniel T. DeGenova DO ,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Taylor MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fastrc.2024.100366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065/pdfft?md5=cb59ce21e0224bd8723e4cffd9b0546f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667396724000065-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667396724000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献中关于全踝关节置换术(TAR)周围创伤性假体周围骨折的记载并不多,总共不到 13 例。这些损伤给治疗外科医生带来了重建方面的挑战。TAR 的使用率持续上升,因此创伤性假体周围踝关节骨折可能会变得更加频繁。目前讨论这种病理的分类、治疗和结果的文献还很缺乏,而且大多讨论的是术中骨折或应力性骨折。作者对一家一级创伤中心的419名踝关节骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。有两名患者(0.004%)发生了创伤性假体周围踝关节骨折,并通过微创开放复位内固定术(ORIF)进行了手术治疗。本文发表时,这些患者已接受了一年的随访。对患者的治疗结果进行了回顾,包括愈合率、愈合时间和翻修需求。结果显示,在平均5个月的时间里,骨折愈合率为100%(2/2)。患者已恢复到术前的功能水平,可以在没有辅助的情况下行走。没有发现再次手术或术后并发症。据作者所知,我们报告的是首例使用 INBONE 全踝系统(田纳西州孟菲斯市莱特医疗集团)进行 TAR 治疗的创伤后假体周围骨折患者的详细疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of traumatic periprosthetic total ankle replacement fractures: A case report involving long-stemmed tibial components

Traumatic periprosthetic fractures around total ankle replacements (TARs) are not well documented in the literature, with less than 13 total cases described. These injuries present reconstructive challenges to the treating surgeon. TAR usage continues to rise, and thus traumatic periprosthetic ankle fractures will likely become more frequent. Current literature discussing the classification, treatment, and outcomes of this pathology is lacking and mostly discusses intra-operative and or stress fractures. The authors retrospectively reviewed 419 patients sustaining ankle fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Two (0.004 %) patients suffered a traumatic periprosthetic ankle fracture and were treated operatively via minimally invasive open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). These patients were followed for a year at the time of publication. Patient outcomes including the union rate, time to union and need for revision were reviewed. Results included 100 % (2/2) fracture union at an average of 5 months. The patients have returned to their pre-operative function level, ambulating unassisted. No re-operations or post-operative complications were noted. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we report the first case report detailing patient outcomes of post-traumatic periprosthetic fractures after TAR, utilizing the INBONE Total Ankle System ( Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.)
Foot & ankle surgery (New York, N.Y.) Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Podiatry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Interpositional arthroplasty of the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joint with an autologous gastrocnemius aponeurosis graft: A surgical technique guide and case series Achilles hero or heel? A systematic review of popliteal nerve block for achilles repair Adenocarcinoma of the lung with metastasis to the foot: A case report MRI findings one year post-radio frequency ablation for chronic Achilles tendonosis: A case report Anatomic lateral ankle reconstruction with tendon allograft after failed brostrom. A case series and surgical technique guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1